Featured Post – Page 2

Mukesh Suman

Advocate | Educator | Author

Featured Post

7 November 2024 Mukesh Kumar Suman

HOW PRESIDENT OF USA IS ELECTED ?

Donald Trump has won the 2024 election for the office of President. He is expected to get support of majority

Featured Post

30 August 2024 Mukesh Kumar Suman

FIR REGISTRATION AND INVESTIGATION UNDER BNSS

Several improvements have been made in the investigation process of an offence under Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sahinta (BNSS). FIR can

Featured Post

6 October 2023 Mukesh Kumar Suman

Bihar Caste Census : Is It An Agenda To Revive Caste Politics ?

Education, urbanization and modernization are weakening the caste identities, but it seems that Political Parties are willing to keep the

Featured Post

29 September 2023 Mukesh Kumar Suman

Women’s Reservation Bill, 2023 : Is It The End Of An Unending Story ?

Women reservation Bill, 2023 also known as Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam, has been finally passed by the Parliament in a

collapsCat options: Array ( [title] => Categories [showPostCount] => 0 [inExclude] => exclude [inExcludeCats] => [showPosts] => 1 [showPages] => 0 [linkToCat] => 1 [olderThan] => 0 [excludeAll] => 0 [catSortOrder] => ASC [catSort] => catName [postSortOrder] => ASC [postSort] => postTitle [expand] => 0 [defaultExpand] => [debug] => 1 [postTitleLength] => 0 [catfeed] => none [taxonomy] => category [post_type] => post [postDateAppend] => after [postDateFormat] => m/d [showPostDate] => 1 [useCookies] => 1 [postsBeforeCats] => 1 [expandCatPost] => 1 [showEmptyCat] => 1 [showTopLevel] => 1 [useAjax] => 0 [customExpand] => [customCollapse] => [style] => kubrick [accordion] => 1 [title_link] => [addMisc] => 1 [addMiscTitle] => [number] => 5 [includeCatArray] => Array ( ) [expandSym] => ► [collapseSym] => ▼ ) postsToExclude: Array ( ) CATEGORY QUERY RESULTS Array ( [0] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 162 [name] => Articles [slug] => articles [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 162 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 108 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 232 [name] => Book Review [slug] => book-review [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 232 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 1 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 233 [name] => Everyday Law [slug] => everyday-law [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 233 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 4 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 234 [name] => Featured Post [slug] => featured-post [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 234 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 9 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 170 [name] => IBC [slug] => ibc [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 170 [taxonomy] => category [description] => IBC category comprises of Articles on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. [parent] => 0 [count] => 42 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 242 [name] => Indian Constitution [slug] => indian-constitution [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 242 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 60 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 35 [name] => Judgments [slug] => judgments [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 35 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 189 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 1 [name] => Legal Formats [slug] => legal-formats [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 1 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 32 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 246 [name] => Professional Ethics [slug] => professional-ethics [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 246 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 13 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 241 [name] => PWDVA [slug] => pwdva [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 241 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 10 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 245 [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 245 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 92 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 244 [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 244 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 81 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 243 [name] => USA Supreme Court [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 243 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 39 [filter] => raw ) ) POST QUERY: select ID, slug, date(post_date) as date, post_status, post_type, post_date, post_author, post_title, post_name, name, object_id, t.term_id from wp_term_relationships AS tr, wp_posts AS p, wp_terms AS t, wp_term_taxonomy AS tt WHERE tt.term_id = t.term_id AND object_id=ID AND post_status='publish' AND tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id AND tt.taxonomy IN ('category') AND post_type='post' ORDER BY p.post_title ASC POST QUERY RESULTS Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11090 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 11:21:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => "AGGRIEVED PERSON" UNDER PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => aggrieved-person-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11090 [term_id] => 241 ) [1] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9854 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-04-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-06 21:19:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF STATUTORY APPEALS FROM TRIBUNALS TO THE SUPREME COURT [post_name] => a-critical-appraisal-of-statutory-appeals-from-tribunals-to-the-supreme-court [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9854 [term_id] => 162 ) [2] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10882 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 19:57:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ADJUDICATORY FRAMEWORK UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => adjudicatory-framework-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10882 [term_id] => 170 ) [3] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1438 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-08-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-24 04:43:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ADMINISTRATIVE RELATIONS BETWEEN UNION AND STATES [post_name] => administrative-relations-between-union-and-states [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1438 [term_id] => 162 ) [4] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1438 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-08-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-24 04:43:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ADMINISTRATIVE RELATIONS BETWEEN UNION AND STATES [post_name] => administrative-relations-between-union-and-states [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1438 [term_id] => 242 ) [5] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11545 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2025-05-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-17 14:24:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ADVISORY JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT AND RECENT PRESIDENTIAL REFERENCE BY SMT. DROUPADI MURMU [post_name] => advisory-jurisdiction-of-the-supreme-court-and-recent-presidential-reference-by-smt-droupadi-murmu [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 11545 [term_id] => 234 ) [6] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10720 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-16 20:17:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => AIIMS STUDENTS UNION VS AIIMS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => aiims-students-union-vs-aiims-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10720 [term_id] => 35 ) [7] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10720 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-16 20:17:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => AIIMS STUDENTS UNION VS AIIMS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => aiims-students-union-vs-aiims-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10720 [term_id] => 245 ) [8] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10736 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2024-11-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-19 12:07:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY VS NARESH AGARWAL: SUPREME COURT FORMULATES INDICIA FOR DETERMINING MINORITY NATURE OF INSTITUTIONS [post_name] => aligarh-muslim-university-vs-naresh-agrawalcase-summary [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 10736 [term_id] => 234 ) [9] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10352 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-11 16:19:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ALOK KAUSHIK VS BHUVANESHWARI RAMANATHAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => alok-kaushik-vs-bhuvaneshwari-ramanathan-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10352 [term_id] => 35 ) [10] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10352 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-11 16:19:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ALOK KAUSHIK VS BHUVANESHWARI RAMANATHAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => alok-kaushik-vs-bhuvaneshwari-ramanathan-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10352 [term_id] => 244 ) [11] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10617 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-10-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-02 20:48:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => AN ANALYSIS OF BAIL JURISPRUDENCE IN INDIA [post_name] => an-analysis-of-bail-jurisprudence-in-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10617 [term_id] => 162 ) [12] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10795 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-27 11:11:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ANOOP BARANWAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => anoop-baranwal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10795 [term_id] => 35 ) [13] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10795 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-27 11:11:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ANOOP BARANWAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => anoop-baranwal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10795 [term_id] => 245 ) [14] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9618 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-02-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-04 18:02:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ANTICIPATORY BAIL FORMAT UNDER SECTION 438 IPC FORMAT [post_name] => anticipatory-bail-format-under-section-438-ipc-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9618 [term_id] => 1 ) [15] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10401 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-22 23:11:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ANUJ JAIN INTERIM RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL FOR JAYPEE INFRATECH VS AXIS BANK LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => anuj-jain-interim-resolution-professional-for-jaypee-infratech-vs-axis-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10401 [term_id] => 35 ) [16] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10401 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-22 23:11:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ANUJ JAIN INTERIM RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL FOR JAYPEE INFRATECH VS AXIS BANK LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => anuj-jain-interim-resolution-professional-for-jaypee-infratech-vs-axis-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10401 [term_id] => 244 ) [17] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9969 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-08 16:14:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION FORMAT UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 9 CPC [post_name] => application-for-restoration-format-under-order-9-rule-9-cpc [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9969 [term_id] => 1 ) [18] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9971 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-08 17:09:04 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE EX PARTE DECREE UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 13 CPC [post_name] => application-for-setting-aside-ex-parte-decree-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9971 [term_id] => 1 ) [19] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9967 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-08 12:20:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION AS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES FORMAT UNDER ORDER 22 RULE 3 CPC [post_name] => application-for-substitution-as-legal-representatives-format-under-order-22-rule-3-cpc [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9967 [term_id] => 1 ) [20] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1322 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-13 15:19:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => APPOINTMENT AND REMOVAL OF JUDGE OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [post_name] => appointment-and-removal-of-a-judge-of-supreme-court-of-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1322 [term_id] => 162 ) [21] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1322 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-13 15:19:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => APPOINTMENT AND REMOVAL OF JUDGE OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [post_name] => appointment-and-removal-of-a-judge-of-supreme-court-of-india [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1322 [term_id] => 242 ) [22] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10418 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-26 21:25:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ARCELORMITTAL INDIA PVT LTD VS SATISH KUMAR GUPTA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => arcelormittal-india-pvt-ltd-vs-satish-kumar-gupta-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10418 [term_id] => 35 ) [23] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10418 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-26 21:25:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ARCELORMITTAL INDIA PVT LTD VS SATISH KUMAR GUPTA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => arcelormittal-india-pvt-ltd-vs-satish-kumar-gupta-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10418 [term_id] => 244 ) [24] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11554 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-05-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-28 20:39:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ARNESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => arnesh-kumar-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11554 [term_id] => 35 ) [25] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10364 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-15 13:16:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ARUN KUMAR JAGATRAMKA VS JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => arun-kumar-jagatramka-vs-jindal-steel-power-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10364 [term_id] => 35 ) [26] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10364 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-15 13:16:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ARUN KUMAR JAGATRAMKA VS JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => arun-kumar-jagatramka-vs-jindal-steel-power-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10364 [term_id] => 244 ) [27] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10310 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-06-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-23 12:12:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ARVIND KEJRIWAL, BAIL AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE FRAMEWORK IN INDIA [post_name] => arvind-kejriwal-bail-and-criminal-justice-framework-in-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10310 [term_id] => 162 ) [28] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10377 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-17 21:52:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY (INDIA ) LTD. VS BISHAL JAISWAL & ANR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => asset-reconstruction-company-india-ltd-vs-bishal-jaiswal-anr-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10377 [term_id] => 35 ) [29] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10377 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-17 21:52:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY (INDIA ) LTD. VS BISHAL JAISWAL & ANR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => asset-reconstruction-company-india-ltd-vs-bishal-jaiswal-anr-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10377 [term_id] => 244 ) [30] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1315 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-12 11:06:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Attachment Before Judgment Under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC [post_name] => attachment-before-judgment-under-order-38-rule-5-cpc [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1315 [term_id] => 162 ) [31] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10866 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 19:01:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => AVOIDABLE TRANSACTIONS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => avoidable-transactions-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10866 [term_id] => 170 ) [32] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1489 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-09-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-15 16:10:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Axis Bank Vs. Naren Sheth : The Supreme Court Reiterates That Documents Acknowledging Debt Can Be Admitted At Appellate Stage Under IBC [post_name] => axis-bank-ltd-vs-naren-sheth-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 1489 [term_id] => 35 ) [33] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1489 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-09-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-15 16:10:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Axis Bank Vs. Naren Sheth : The Supreme Court Reiterates That Documents Acknowledging Debt Can Be Admitted At Appellate Stage Under IBC [post_name] => axis-bank-ltd-vs-naren-sheth-case-summary [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1489 [term_id] => 162 ) [34] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10315 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-06-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-28 15:23:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => B K EDUCATIONAL SERVICES VS PARAG GUPTA & ASSOCIATES : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => b-k-educational-services-vs-parag-gupta-associates-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10315 [term_id] => 35 ) [35] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10315 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-06-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-28 15:23:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => B K EDUCATIONAL SERVICES VS PARAG GUPTA & ASSOCIATES : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => b-k-educational-services-vs-parag-gupta-associates-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10315 [term_id] => 244 ) [36] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10610 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-28 12:13:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => B. P. SINGHAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => b-p-singhal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10610 [term_id] => 35 ) [37] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10610 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-28 12:13:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => B. P. SINGHAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => b-p-singhal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10610 [term_id] => 245 ) [38] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10393 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-20 19:59:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BABULAL VARDHARJI GURJAR VS. VEER GURJAR ALUMINIUM INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => babulal-vardharji-gurjar-vs-veer-gurjar-aluminium-industries-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10393 [term_id] => 35 ) [39] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10393 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-20 19:59:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BABULAL VARDHARJI GURJAR VS. VEER GURJAR ALUMINIUM INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => babulal-vardharji-gurjar-vs-veer-gurjar-aluminium-industries-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10393 [term_id] => 244 ) [40] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10360 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-14 12:28:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BANK OF BARODA & ANR VS MBL INFRASTRUCTURES LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => bank-of-baroda-anr-vs-mbl-infrastructures-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10360 [term_id] => 35 ) [41] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10360 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-14 12:28:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BANK OF BARODA & ANR VS MBL INFRASTRUCTURES LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => bank-of-baroda-anr-vs-mbl-infrastructures-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10360 [term_id] => 244 ) [42] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11141 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-02-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-28 15:26:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BANK OF BARODA VS FAROOQ ALI KHAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => bank-of-baroda-vs-farooq-ali-khan-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11141 [term_id] => 35 ) [43] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11141 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2025-02-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-28 15:26:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BANK OF BARODA VS FAROOQ ALI KHAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => bank-of-baroda-vs-farooq-ali-khan-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 11141 [term_id] => 244 ) [44] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2707 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-01-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-15 17:49:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Bharti Airtel Ltd Vs. Vijaykumar V. Iyer : The Supreme Court holds that Set off is not permissible during CIRP [post_name] => bharti-airtel-ltd-vs-vijaykumar-v-iyer-supreme-court [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2707 [term_id] => 35 ) [45] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2707 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-01-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-15 17:49:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Bharti Airtel Ltd Vs. Vijaykumar V. Iyer : The Supreme Court holds that Set off is not permissible during CIRP [post_name] => bharti-airtel-ltd-vs-vijaykumar-v-iyer-supreme-court [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 2707 [term_id] => 244 ) [46] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2062 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2023-10-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-06 07:14:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Bihar Caste Census : Is It An Agenda To Revive Caste Politics ? [post_name] => bihar-caste-census-is-it-an-agenda-to-revive-caste-politics [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 2062 [term_id] => 234 ) [47] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10655 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-11 10:08:22 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BIJOE EMMANUEL VS. STATE OF KERALA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => bijoe-emmanuel-vs-state-of-kerala-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10655 [term_id] => 35 ) [48] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10655 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-11 10:08:22 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BIJOE EMMANUEL VS. STATE OF KERALA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => bijoe-emmanuel-vs-state-of-kerala-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10655 [term_id] => 245 ) [49] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1434 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-08-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-14 17:47:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Bills To Replace Penal Code, Criminal Procedure And Evidence Act Introduced In Parliament [post_name] => bills-to-replace-penal-code-criminal-procedure-and-evidence-act [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1434 [term_id] => 162 ) [50] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1280 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-07-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-03 10:14:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Brandenburg Vs. Ohio (Case Summary) [post_name] => brandenburg-vs-ohio-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 1280 [term_id] => 243 ) [51] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1275 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-07-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-03 01:22:16 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Brown VS Board Of Education : Segregated Schools For White And Colored Race Are Unconstitutional [post_name] => brown-vs-board-of-education-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 1275 [term_id] => 243 ) [52] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10416 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-26 09:51:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BRS VENTURES INVESTMENT LTD. VS SREI INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => brs-ventures-investment-ltd-vs-srei-infrastructure-finance-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10416 [term_id] => 35 ) [53] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10416 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-26 09:51:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BRS VENTURES INVESTMENT LTD. VS SREI INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => brs-ventures-investment-ltd-vs-srei-infrastructure-finance-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10416 [term_id] => 244 ) [54] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10566 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-12 23:00:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BUCK VS BELL : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => buck-vs-bell-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10566 [term_id] => 243 ) [55] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10585 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-15 12:23:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BUCKLEY VS VALEO : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => buckley-vs-valeo-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10585 [term_id] => 243 ) [56] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9804 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-03-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-26 12:02:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CAN AN ADVOCATE SOLICIT WORK OR ADVERTISE ? [post_name] => can-an-advocate-solicit-work-or-advertise [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9804 [term_id] => 162 ) [57] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9804 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-03-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-26 12:02:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CAN AN ADVOCATE SOLICIT WORK OR ADVERTISE ? [post_name] => can-an-advocate-solicit-work-or-advertise [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 9804 [term_id] => 246 ) [58] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10887 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-12-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-24 23:48:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CHINA DEVELOPMENT BANK VS. DOHA BANK Q.P.S.C. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => china-development-bank-vs-doha-bank-q-p-s-c-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10887 [term_id] => 244 ) [59] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10587 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-15 13:38:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CITIZENS UNITED VS FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => citizens-united-vs-federal-election-commission-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10587 [term_id] => 243 ) [60] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9760 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-03-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-12 17:25:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT, 2019 (CAA) COMES INTO FORCE [post_name] => citizenship-amendment-act-2019-caa-comes-in-force [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9760 [term_id] => 162 ) [61] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 560 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-04-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-27 09:36:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CITIZENSHIP OF INDIA [post_name] => citizenship-of-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 560 [term_id] => 162 ) [62] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 560 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-04-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-27 09:36:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CITIZENSHIP OF INDIA [post_name] => citizenship-of-india [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 560 [term_id] => 242 ) [63] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10535 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-07 17:46:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CIVIL RIGHTS CASES : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => civil-rights-cases-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10535 [term_id] => 243 ) [64] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1195 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-08 12:55:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Classification Of Creditors Under IBC [post_name] => classification-of-creditors-under-ibc [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1195 [term_id] => 162 ) [65] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1195 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-08 12:55:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Classification Of Creditors Under IBC [post_name] => classification-of-creditors-under-ibc [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1195 [term_id] => 170 ) [66] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10399 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-22 16:23:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS OF ESSAR STEEL INDIA LTD VS SATISH KUMAR GUPTA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => committee-of-creditors-of-essar-steel-india-ltd-vs-satish-kumar-gupta-case-summary-2 [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10399 [term_id] => 35 ) [67] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10399 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-22 16:23:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS OF ESSAR STEEL INDIA LTD VS SATISH KUMAR GUPTA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => committee-of-creditors-of-essar-steel-india-ltd-vs-satish-kumar-gupta-case-summary-2 [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10399 [term_id] => 244 ) [68] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10776 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-23 15:28:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COMMON CAUSE VS UNION OF INDIA (RIGHT TO DIE OF TERMINALLY ILL PERSONS ) [post_name] => common-cause-vs-union-of-india-right-to-die-of-terminally-ill-persons [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10776 [term_id] => 35 ) [69] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10776 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-23 15:28:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COMMON CAUSE VS UNION OF INDIA (RIGHT TO DIE OF TERMINALLY ILL PERSONS ) [post_name] => common-cause-vs-union-of-india-right-to-die-of-terminally-ill-persons [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10776 [term_id] => 245 ) [70] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9453 [slug] => everyday-law [date] => 2024-01-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-23 11:04:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Compensation In Motor Accident Cases [post_name] => compensation-in-motor-accident-cases [name] => Everyday Law [object_id] => 9453 [term_id] => 233 ) [71] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 747 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-05-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-21 18:09:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Complaint Before Magistrate Format [post_name] => complaint-before-magistrate-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 747 [term_id] => 1 ) [72] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 764 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-05-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-22 11:51:59 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Complaint Format Under Section 138 NI Act [post_name] => complaint-format-under-section-138-ni-act [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 764 [term_id] => 1 ) [73] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1397 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-26 06:51:35 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COMPOSITTION OF STATE LEGISLATURE [post_name] => compostion-of-state-legislature [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1397 [term_id] => 162 ) [74] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1397 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-26 06:51:35 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COMPOSITTION OF STATE LEGISLATURE [post_name] => compostion-of-state-legislature [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1397 [term_id] => 242 ) [75] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11159 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2025-03-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-14 10:28:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONDONATION OF DELAY APPLICATION FORMAT [post_name] => condonation-of-delay-application-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 11159 [term_id] => 1 ) [76] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10840 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 17:12:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONDUCT OF CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS (CIRP) UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => conduct-of-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-cirp-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10840 [term_id] => 170 ) [77] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10383 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-19 12:54:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTION CONSORTIUM LIMITED VS HITRO ENERGY SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => consolidated-construction-consortium-limited-vs-hitro-energy-solutions-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10383 [term_id] => 35 ) [78] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10383 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-19 12:54:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTION CONSORTIUM LIMITED VS HITRO ENERGY SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => consolidated-construction-consortium-limited-vs-hitro-energy-solutions-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10383 [term_id] => 244 ) [79] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11416 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2025-03-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-22 22:52:46 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONSTITUTION OF BENCHES IN SUPREME COURT [post_name] => constitution-of-benches-in-supreme-court [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 11416 [term_id] => 242 ) [80] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11081 [slug] => articles [date] => 2025-02-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-12 21:53:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONSTITUTIONALISM, TRANSFORMATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM AND CONSTITUTIONAL MORALITY [post_name] => constitutionalism-transformative-constitutionalism-and-constitutional-morality [name] => Articles [object_id] => 11081 [term_id] => 162 ) [81] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11081 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2025-02-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-12 21:53:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONSTITUTIONALISM, TRANSFORMATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM AND CONSTITUTIONAL MORALITY [post_name] => constitutionalism-transformative-constitutionalism-and-constitutional-morality [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 11081 [term_id] => 242 ) [82] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10450 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-08-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-29 09:55:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONSUMER COMPLAINT FORMAT [post_name] => consumer-complaint-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 10450 [term_id] => 1 ) [83] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9958 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-06 12:07:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONTEMPT PETITION FORMAT UNDER ARTICLE 129 [post_name] => contempt-petition-format-under-article-129 [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9958 [term_id] => 1 ) [84] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1248 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-20 09:27:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COUNCIL OF MINISTERS AND THEIR COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY [post_name] => council-of-ministers-and-their-collective-responsibility [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1248 [term_id] => 162 ) [85] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1248 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-20 09:27:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COUNCIL OF MINISTERS AND THEIR COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY [post_name] => council-of-ministers-and-their-collective-responsibility [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1248 [term_id] => 242 ) [86] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11547 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-05-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-17 22:16:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COX AND KINGS LTD VS SAP INDIA PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => cox-and-kings-ltd-vs-sap-india-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11547 [term_id] => 35 ) [87] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9973 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-05-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-09 22:29:16 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT : AN OVERVIEW [post_name] => criminal-appellate-jurisdiction-of-the-supreme-court-an-overview [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9973 [term_id] => 162 ) [88] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11166 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2025-03-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-14 13:11:16 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION FORMAT (HIGH COURT) [post_name] => criminal-revision-petition-format-high-court [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 11166 [term_id] => 1 ) [89] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1190 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-08 12:42:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Cross Border Insolvency Under IBC [post_name] => cross-border-insolvency-under-ibc [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1190 [term_id] => 162 ) [90] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1190 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-08 12:42:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Cross Border Insolvency Under IBC [post_name] => cross-border-insolvency-under-ibc [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1190 [term_id] => 170 ) [91] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1224 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-13 09:05:37 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS (ARTICLE 29-30) [post_name] => cultural-and-educational-rights-article-29-30 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1224 [term_id] => 162 ) [92] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1224 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-13 09:05:37 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS (ARTICLE 29-30) [post_name] => cultural-and-educational-rights-article-29-30 [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1224 [term_id] => 242 ) [93] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9956 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-06 09:46:35 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CURATIVE PETITION FORMAT [post_name] => curative-petition-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9956 [term_id] => 1 ) [94] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1457 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-09-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-04 17:09:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Curious Case Of Sivanandan C T VS High Court Of Kerala [post_name] => curious-case-of-sivanandan-c-t-vs-high-court-of-kerala [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 1457 [term_id] => 35 ) [95] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10906 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-12-31 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-31 12:31:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => D. D. INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. VS RAJESH KUMAR AGARWAL, LIQUIDATOR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => d-d-international-pvt-ltd-vs-rajesh-kumar-agarwal-liquidator-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10906 [term_id] => 244 ) [96] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9753 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-06 08:39:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => D. K. BASU VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => d-k-basu-vs-state-of-west-bengal-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9753 [term_id] => 35 ) [97] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9753 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-03-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-06 08:39:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => D. K. BASU VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => d-k-basu-vs-state-of-west-bengal-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9753 [term_id] => 245 ) [98] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10717 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-16 11:43:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DAMYANTI NARANGA VS. UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => damyanti-naranga-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10717 [term_id] => 35 ) [99] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10717 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-16 11:43:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DAMYANTI NARANGA VS. UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => damyanti-naranga-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10717 [term_id] => 245 ) [100] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2562 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-01-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-06 07:33:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DBS Bank Ltd Singapore Vs Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd : The Supreme Court refers the matter related to treatment of dissenting secured creditors during CIRP to larger Bench [post_name] => dbs-bank-ltd-singapore-vs-ruchi-soya-industries-ltd [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2562 [term_id] => 35 ) [101] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2562 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-01-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-06 07:33:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DBS Bank Ltd Singapore Vs Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd : The Supreme Court refers the matter related to treatment of dissenting secured creditors during CIRP to larger Bench [post_name] => dbs-bank-ltd-singapore-vs-ruchi-soya-industries-ltd [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 2562 [term_id] => 244 ) [102] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9819 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-30 12:02:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DECCAN VALUE INVESTORS L P VS DINKAR VENKATASUBRAMANIAN : INFORMATION MEMORANDUM CAN NOT BE TESTED ON "TRUE PICTURE OF RISK" OBLIGATION [post_name] => deccan-value-investors-l-p-vs-dinkar-venkatasubramanian-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9819 [term_id] => 35 ) [103] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9819 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-03-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-30 12:02:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DECCAN VALUE INVESTORS L P VS DINKAR VENKATASUBRAMANIAN : INFORMATION MEMORANDUM CAN NOT BE TESTED ON "TRUE PICTURE OF RISK" OBLIGATION [post_name] => deccan-value-investors-l-p-vs-dinkar-venkatasubramanian-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 9819 [term_id] => 244 ) [104] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10069 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-05-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-26 13:00:37 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DEFENSES AVAILABLE IN CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS [post_name] => defenses-available-in-contempt-proceedings [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10069 [term_id] => 162 ) [105] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10069 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-05-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-26 13:00:37 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DEFENSES AVAILABLE IN CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS [post_name] => defenses-available-in-contempt-proceedings [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 10069 [term_id] => 246 ) [106] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11095 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 15:05:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DEFINITION OF "DOMESTIC INCIDENT REPORT" UNDER PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => definition-of-domestic-incident-report-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11095 [term_id] => 241 ) [107] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11097 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 15:12:59 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DEFINITION OF "DOMESTIC RELATIONSHIP" UNDER PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => definition-of-domestic-relationship-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11097 [term_id] => 241 ) [108] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11101 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 15:45:07 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DEFINITION OF "DOMESTIC VIOLENCE" UNDER PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => definition-of-domestic-violence-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11101 [term_id] => 241 ) [109] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11099 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 15:26:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DEFINITION OF "SHARED HOUSEHOLD" UNDER SECTION 2 (s) OF THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => definition-of-shared-household-under-section-2-s-of-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11099 [term_id] => 241 ) [110] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1262 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-28 13:52:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DELIMITATION OF LOK SABHA AND VIDHAN SABHA CONSTITUENCIES [post_name] => delimitation-of-lok-sabha-and-vidhan-sabha-constituencies [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1262 [term_id] => 162 ) [111] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1262 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-28 13:52:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DELIMITATION OF LOK SABHA AND VIDHAN SABHA CONSTITUENCIES [post_name] => delimitation-of-lok-sabha-and-vidhan-sabha-constituencies [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1262 [term_id] => 242 ) [112] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10385 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-19 18:16:07 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DENA BANK (NOW BANK OF BARODA) VS. C SHIVAKUMAR REDDY AND ANR. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dena-bank-now-bank-of-baroda-vs-c-shivakumar-reddy-and-anr-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10385 [term_id] => 35 ) [113] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10385 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-19 18:16:07 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DENA BANK (NOW BANK OF BARODA) VS. C SHIVAKUMAR REDDY AND ANR. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dena-bank-now-bank-of-baroda-vs-c-shivakumar-reddy-and-anr-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10385 [term_id] => 244 ) [114] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9981 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-12 22:20:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DHEERAJ MOR VS HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dheeraj-mor-vs-honble-high-court-of-delhi-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9981 [term_id] => 35 ) [115] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9981 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-12 22:20:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DHEERAJ MOR VS HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dheeraj-mor-vs-honble-high-court-of-delhi-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9981 [term_id] => 245 ) [116] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2336 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-11-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-26 07:42:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Dilip B Jiwrajka Vs. Union of India: Supreme Court upholds validity of Section 95 -100 of IBC [post_name] => dilip-b-jiwrajka-vs-union-of-india-supreme-court-upholds-validity-of-section-95-100-of-ibc [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2336 [term_id] => 35 ) [117] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2336 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-11-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-26 07:42:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Dilip B Jiwrajka Vs. Union of India: Supreme Court upholds validity of Section 95 -100 of IBC [post_name] => dilip-b-jiwrajka-vs-union-of-india-supreme-court-upholds-validity-of-section-95-100-of-ibc [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 2336 [term_id] => 244 ) [118] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1234 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-16 13:27:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY ? (Art 36 To 51) [post_name] => directive-principles-of-state-policy [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1234 [term_id] => 162 ) [119] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1234 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-16 13:27:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY ? (Art 36 To 51) [post_name] => directive-principles-of-state-policy [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1234 [term_id] => 242 ) [120] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10862 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 18:38:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DISSOLUTION OF CORPORATE DEBTOR UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => dissolution-of-corporate-debtor-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10862 [term_id] => 170 ) [121] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10574 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-14 21:30:03 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VS HELLER : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => district-of-columbia-vs-heller-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10574 [term_id] => 243 ) [122] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9559 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-01-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-30 05:10:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DIVORCE PETITION ON GROUND OF CRUELTY FORMAT [post_name] => divorce-petition-on-ground-of-cruelty-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9559 [term_id] => 1 ) [123] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2422 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-20 17:04:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Dobbs Vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization : Constitution Does Not Grant Right To Abortion [post_name] => dobbs-vs-jackson-womens-health-organ-constitution-does-not-grant-right-to-abortion [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2422 [term_id] => 243 ) [124] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2364 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-12-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-05 07:01:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DOCTRINE OF BASIC STRUCTURE : WHETHER PROGRESSIVE PRINCIPLE OR DILUTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ? [post_name] => doctrine-of-basic-structure-whether-progressive-principle-or-dilution-of-fundamental-rights [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2364 [term_id] => 162 ) [125] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2364 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-12-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-05 07:01:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DOCTRINE OF BASIC STRUCTURE : WHETHER PROGRESSIVE PRINCIPLE OR DILUTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ? [post_name] => doctrine-of-basic-structure-whether-progressive-principle-or-dilution-of-fundamental-rights [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2364 [term_id] => 242 ) [126] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9794 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-03-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-24 22:16:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DOES AN ADVOCATE HAVE RIGHT TO STRIKE ? [post_name] => does-an-advocate-have-right-to-strike [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9794 [term_id] => 162 ) [127] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9794 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-03-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-24 22:16:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DOES AN ADVOCATE HAVE RIGHT TO STRIKE ? [post_name] => does-an-advocate-have-right-to-strike [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 9794 [term_id] => 246 ) [128] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10452 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-08-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-29 11:14:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COMPLAINT (PWDVA) FORMAT [post_name] => domestic-violence-complaint-pwdva [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 10452 [term_id] => 1 ) [129] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9749 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-03-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-05 05:53:37 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Donald J. Trump Vs Norma Anderson : the USA Supreme Court sets aside debarment of Former President Trump from primary ballot [post_name] => donald-j-trump-vs-norma-anderson-usa-supreme-court [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 9749 [term_id] => 243 ) [130] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10606 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-26 13:08:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DR D. C. WADHWA VS. STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dr-d-c-wadhwa-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10606 [term_id] => 35 ) [131] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10606 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-26 13:08:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DR D. C. WADHWA VS. STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dr-d-c-wadhwa-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10606 [term_id] => 245 ) [132] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9781 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-14 09:16:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DR. ASHWANI KUMAR VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dr-ashwani-kumar-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9781 [term_id] => 35 ) [133] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9781 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-03-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-14 09:16:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DR. ASHWANI KUMAR VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dr-ashwani-kumar-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9781 [term_id] => 245 ) [134] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10623 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-10-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-20 13:51:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DR. PRADEEP JAIN VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dr-pradeep-jain-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10623 [term_id] => 35 ) [135] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10623 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-10-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-20 13:51:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DR. PRADEEP JAIN VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dr-pradeep-jain-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10623 [term_id] => 245 ) [136] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2383 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 15:51:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Dred Scott Vs Sandford : A Negro Cannot Be Citizen Of USA [post_name] => dred-scott-vs-sandford-a-negro-cannot-be-citizen-of-usa [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2383 [term_id] => 243 ) [137] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10335 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-08 11:21:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DUNCANS INDUSTRIES LTD. VS. A. J. AGROCHEM : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => duncans-industries-ltd-vs-a-j-agrochem-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10335 [term_id] => 35 ) [138] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10335 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-08 11:21:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DUNCANS INDUSTRIES LTD. VS. A. J. AGROCHEM : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => duncans-industries-ltd-vs-a-j-agrochem-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10335 [term_id] => 244 ) [139] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10715 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-16 10:08:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => E. R. ROYAPPA VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => e-r-royappa-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10715 [term_id] => 35 ) [140] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10715 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-16 10:08:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => E. R. ROYAPPA VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => e-r-royappa-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10715 [term_id] => 245 ) [141] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10391 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-20 17:22:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => E. S. KRISHNAMURTHY & ORS. VS. M/S BHARATH HI TECH BUILDERS PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => e-s-krishnamurthy-ors-vs-m-s-bharath-hi-tech-builders-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10391 [term_id] => 35 ) [142] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10391 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-20 17:22:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => E. S. KRISHNAMURTHY & ORS. VS. M/S BHARATH HI TECH BUILDERS PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => e-s-krishnamurthy-ors-vs-m-s-bharath-hi-tech-builders-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10391 [term_id] => 244 ) [143] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10445 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-08-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-14 13:49:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => E. V. CHINNAIAH VS STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => e-v-chinnaiah-vs-state-of-andhra-pradesh-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10445 [term_id] => 35 ) [144] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10445 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-08-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-14 13:49:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => E. V. CHINNAIAH VS STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => e-v-chinnaiah-vs-state-of-andhra-pradesh-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10445 [term_id] => 245 ) [145] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10403 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-23 23:36:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EBIX SINGAPORE PVT LTD VS COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS OF EDUCOMP SOLUTIONS LIMITED & ANR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => ebix-singapore-pvt-ltd-vs-committee-of-creditors-of-educomp-solutions-limited-anr-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10403 [term_id] => 35 ) [146] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10403 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-23 23:36:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EBIX SINGAPORE PVT LTD VS COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS OF EDUCOMP SOLUTIONS LIMITED & ANR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => ebix-singapore-pvt-ltd-vs-committee-of-creditors-of-educomp-solutions-limited-anr-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10403 [term_id] => 244 ) [147] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1492 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-09-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-16 18:07:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ELECTION COMMISSION AND ELECTORAL SYSTEM IN INDIA [post_name] => election-commission-and-electoral-system-in-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1492 [term_id] => 162 ) [148] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1492 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-09-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-16 18:07:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ELECTION COMMISSION AND ELECTORAL SYSTEM IN INDIA [post_name] => election-commission-and-electoral-system-in-india [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1492 [term_id] => 242 ) [149] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1251 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-23 07:49:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ELECTION OF MEMBERS OF RAJYA SABHA WITH CASE STUDY [post_name] => election-of-members-of-rajya-sabha-with-case-study [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1251 [term_id] => 162 ) [150] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1251 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-23 07:49:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ELECTION OF MEMBERS OF RAJYA SABHA WITH CASE STUDY [post_name] => election-of-members-of-rajya-sabha-with-case-study [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1251 [term_id] => 242 ) [151] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1242 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-18 09:32:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ELECTION OF PRESIDENT OF INDIA [post_name] => election-of-the-president-of-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1242 [term_id] => 162 ) [152] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1242 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-18 09:32:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ELECTION OF PRESIDENT OF INDIA [post_name] => election-of-the-president-of-india [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1242 [term_id] => 242 ) [153] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10356 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-12 11:12:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EMBASSY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS PVT. LTD. VS STATE OF KARNATAKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => embassy-property-developments-pvt-ltd-vs-state-of-karnataka-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10356 [term_id] => 35 ) [154] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10356 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-12 11:12:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EMBASSY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS PVT. LTD. VS STATE OF KARNATAKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => embassy-property-developments-pvt-ltd-vs-state-of-karnataka-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10356 [term_id] => 244 ) [155] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2040 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-09-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-26 14:12:59 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EMERGENCY PROVISIONS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION [post_name] => emergency-provisions-under-the-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2040 [term_id] => 162 ) [156] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2040 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-09-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-26 14:12:59 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EMERGENCY PROVISIONS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION [post_name] => emergency-provisions-under-the-constitution [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2040 [term_id] => 242 ) [157] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1485 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-09-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-13 15:46:35 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Eva Argo Feeds Vs. Punjab National Bank : The Supreme Court Observes That If The Liquidator Does Not Want To Accept Bid Of The Highest Bidder He Has To Apply His Mind To Relevant Factors [post_name] => eva-argo-feeds-pvt-ltd-vs-punjab-national-bank-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 1485 [term_id] => 35 ) [158] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1485 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-09-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-13 15:46:35 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Eva Argo Feeds Vs. Punjab National Bank : The Supreme Court Observes That If The Liquidator Does Not Want To Accept Bid Of The Highest Bidder He Has To Apply His Mind To Relevant Factors [post_name] => eva-argo-feeds-pvt-ltd-vs-punjab-national-bank-case-summary [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1485 [term_id] => 162 ) [159] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 743 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-05-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-21 18:03:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Evidence By Way Of Affidavit Format [post_name] => evidence-by-way-of-affidavit-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 743 [term_id] => 1 ) [160] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10824 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 15:39:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EVOLUTION OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => evolution-of-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10824 [term_id] => 170 ) [161] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10078 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-05-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-27 16:17:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EVOLUTION OF LEGAL PROFESSION IN INDIA [post_name] => evolution-of-legal-profession-in-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10078 [term_id] => 162 ) [162] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10078 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-05-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-27 16:17:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EVOLUTION OF LEGAL PROFESSION IN INDIA [post_name] => evolution-of-legal-profession-in-india [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 10078 [term_id] => 246 ) [163] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10306 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-06-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-17 14:21:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EVOLUTION OF RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN INDIA [post_name] => evolution-of-right-to-privacy-in-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10306 [term_id] => 162 ) [164] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10306 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2024-06-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-17 14:21:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EVOLUTION OF RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN INDIA [post_name] => evolution-of-right-to-privacy-in-india [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 10306 [term_id] => 242 ) [165] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11109 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 20:00:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EX PARTE ORDERS UNDER PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => ex-parte-orders-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11109 [term_id] => 241 ) [166] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 760 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-05-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-22 07:24:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EX POST FACTO LAWS, DOUBLE JEOPARDY AND PROHIBITION FROM SELF INCRIMINATION (ARTICLE 20) [post_name] => double-jeopardy-article-20 [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 760 [term_id] => 242 ) [167] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9714 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-02-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-14 13:06:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EXCEL CROP CARE LTD VS COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => excel-crop-care-ltd-vs-competition-commission-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9714 [term_id] => 35 ) [168] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10707 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-14 10:17:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EXCEL WEAR ETC VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => excel-wear-etc-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10707 [term_id] => 245 ) [169] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11537 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2025-05-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-06 18:54:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EXECUTION PETITION FORMAT [post_name] => execution-petition-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 11537 [term_id] => 1 ) [170] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10848 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 17:52:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EXTENSION, EXCLUSION & WITHDRAWAL OF CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS (CIRP) UNDER THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => extension-exclusion-withdrawal-of-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-cirp-under-the-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10848 [term_id] => 170 ) [171] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10826 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 15:55:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EXTENT AND APPLICABILITY OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => extent-and-applicability-of-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10826 [term_id] => 170 ) [172] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2042 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-09-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-28 08:05:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EXTENT OF POWER OF PARLIAMENT TO AMEND CONSTITUTION [post_name] => extent-of-power-of-the-parliament-to-amend-the-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2042 [term_id] => 162 ) [173] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2042 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-09-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-28 08:05:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EXTENT OF POWER OF PARLIAMENT TO AMEND CONSTITUTION [post_name] => extent-of-power-of-the-parliament-to-amend-the-constitution [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2042 [term_id] => 242 ) [174] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10872 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 19:27:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FAST TRACK CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => fast-track-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10872 [term_id] => 170 ) [175] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 544 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-04-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-17 07:12:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FEATURES OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => features-of-indian-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 544 [term_id] => 162 ) [176] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 544 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-04-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-17 07:12:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FEATURES OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => features-of-indian-constitution [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 544 [term_id] => 242 ) [177] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10455 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2024-08-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-30 15:21:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FIR REGISTRATION AND INVESTIGATION UNDER BNSS [post_name] => fir-registration-and-investigation-under-bnss [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 10455 [term_id] => 234 ) [178] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11419 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2025-03-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-27 00:45:03 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FIRE AT JUDGE'S HOUSE & BURNING OF RULE OF LAW [post_name] => fire-at-judges-house-burning-of-rule-of-law [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 11419 [term_id] => 234 ) [179] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1461 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-09-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-05 16:00:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => First Motion Application For Divorce By Mutual Consent Format [post_name] => first-motion-application-for-divorce-by-mutual-consent-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 1461 [term_id] => 1 ) [180] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10657 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-12 12:50:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FRANCIS CORALIE MULLIN VS. THE ADMINISTRATOR, UNION TERRITORY OF DELHI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => francis-coralie-mullin-vs-the-administrator-union-territory-of-delhi-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10657 [term_id] => 35 ) [181] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10657 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-12 12:50:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FRANCIS CORALIE MULLIN VS. THE ADMINISTRATOR, UNION TERRITORY OF DELHI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => francis-coralie-mullin-vs-the-administrator-union-territory-of-delhi-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10657 [term_id] => 245 ) [182] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10868 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 19:14:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FRAUDULENT OR MALICIOUS CIRP INITIATION UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => fraudulent-or-malicious-cirp-initiation-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10868 [term_id] => 170 ) [183] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10838 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 17:00:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FUNCTIONS OF COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => functions-of-committee-of-creditors-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10838 [term_id] => 170 ) [184] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10852 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 18:04:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FUNCTIONS OF LIQUIDATOR UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => functions-of-liquidator-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10852 [term_id] => 170 ) [185] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11103 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 18:50:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FUNCTIONS OF PROTECTION OFFICER UNDER PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => functions-of-protection-officer-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11103 [term_id] => 241 ) [186] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 616 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-05-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-05 16:14:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND STATE [post_name] => fundamental-rights-and-state [name] => Articles [object_id] => 616 [term_id] => 162 ) [187] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 616 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-05-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-05 16:14:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND STATE [post_name] => fundamental-rights-and-state [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 616 [term_id] => 242 ) [188] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 371 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-02-13 17:14:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GHANASHYAM MISHRA VS. EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION LTD. (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => ghanshyam-mishra [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 371 [term_id] => 35 ) [189] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 371 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-02-13 17:14:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GHANASHYAM MISHRA VS. EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION LTD. (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => ghanshyam-mishra [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 371 [term_id] => 244 ) [190] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2381 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 15:44:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Gibbons Vs Ogden : Congress Can Regulate Inters state commerce [post_name] => gibbons-vs-ogden-congress-can-regulate-inters-state-commerce [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2381 [term_id] => 243 ) [191] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2393 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 16:23:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Gideon Vs. Wainwright : Poor Criminal Defendants Have To Provided Attorney Free Of Cost [post_name] => gideon-vs-wainwright-poor-criminal-defendants-have-to-provided-attorney-free-of-cost [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2393 [term_id] => 243 ) [192] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9738 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-01 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-01 10:12:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GITHA HARIHARAN VS RESERVE BANK OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => githa-hariharan-vs-reserve-bank-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9738 [term_id] => 35 ) [193] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9931 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-28 18:13:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GLOBAL CREDIT CAPITAL LTD VS SACH MARKETING PVT LTD : REAL NATURE OF TRANSACTION HAS TO BE ASCERTAINED TO DETERMINE WHETHER A CREDITOR IS OPERATIONAL OR FINANCIAL CREDTIOR [post_name] => global-credit-capital-ltd-vs-sach-marketing-pvt-ltd [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9931 [term_id] => 35 ) [194] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9931 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-04-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-28 18:13:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GLOBAL CREDIT CAPITAL LTD VS SACH MARKETING PVT LTD : REAL NATURE OF TRANSACTION HAS TO BE ASCERTAINED TO DETERMINE WHETHER A CREDITOR IS OPERATIONAL OR FINANCIAL CREDTIOR [post_name] => global-credit-capital-ltd-vs-sach-marketing-pvt-ltd [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 9931 [term_id] => 244 ) [195] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1111 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-02 11:16:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Glukrich Capital Pvt. Ltd. VS. The State Of West Bengal & Ors (Case Summary) [post_name] => glukrich-capital-pvt-ltd-vs-the-state-of-west-bengal [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1111 [term_id] => 162 ) [196] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1111 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-02 11:16:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Glukrich Capital Pvt. Ltd. VS. The State Of West Bengal & Ors (Case Summary) [post_name] => glukrich-capital-pvt-ltd-vs-the-state-of-west-bengal [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1111 [term_id] => 170 ) [197] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9727 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-02-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-21 15:45:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority Vs. Prabhjit Singh Soni : Supreme Court observes that NCLT has inherent power to recall an order [post_name] => greater-noida-industrial-development-authority-vs-prabhjit-singh-soni [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9727 [term_id] => 35 ) [198] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9727 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-02-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-21 15:45:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority Vs. Prabhjit Singh Soni : Supreme Court observes that NCLT has inherent power to recall an order [post_name] => greater-noida-industrial-development-authority-vs-prabhjit-singh-soni [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 9727 [term_id] => 244 ) [199] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10581 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-15 11:57:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GREGG VS GEORGIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => gregg-vs-georgia-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10581 [term_id] => 243 ) [200] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10542 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-08 13:19:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GRISWOLD VS CONNECTICUT : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => griswold-vs-connecticut-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10542 [term_id] => 243 ) [201] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1193 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-08 12:50:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Group Insolvency Under IBC [post_name] => group-insolvency-under-ibc [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1193 [term_id] => 162 ) [202] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1193 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-08 12:50:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Group Insolvency Under IBC [post_name] => group-insolvency-under-ibc [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1193 [term_id] => 170 ) [203] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10395 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-21 19:44:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LTD VS. AMIT GUPTA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => gujarat-urja-vikas-nigam-ltd-vs-amit-gupta-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10395 [term_id] => 35 ) [204] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10395 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-21 19:44:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LTD VS. AMIT GUPTA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => gujarat-urja-vikas-nigam-ltd-vs-amit-gupta-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10395 [term_id] => 244 ) [205] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9940 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-04 10:48:50 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HABEUS CORPUS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 FORMAT [post_name] => habeus-corpus-writ-petition-under-article-32-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9940 [term_id] => 1 ) [206] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2413 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-12-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-20 16:39:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Haldiram Incorporation Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Amrit Hatcheries Pvt. Ltd. : The Supreme Court Holds That Handing Over Sale Certificate Completes Auction [post_name] => haldiram-incorporation-pvt-ltd-vs-amrit-hatcheries-pvt-ltd-the-supreme-court-holds-that-handing-over-sale-certificate-completes-auction [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2413 [term_id] => 35 ) [207] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2413 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-12-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-20 16:39:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Haldiram Incorporation Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Amrit Hatcheries Pvt. Ltd. : The Supreme Court Holds That Handing Over Sale Certificate Completes Auction [post_name] => haldiram-incorporation-pvt-ltd-vs-amrit-hatcheries-pvt-ltd-the-supreme-court-holds-that-handing-over-sale-certificate-completes-auction [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 2413 [term_id] => 244 ) [208] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2405 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-12-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-20 06:15:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Hari Bhai Thota : Supreme Court Observes That Exemption Under 240 A For MSME Applies At The Time Of Submission Of Resolution Plan [post_name] => hari-bhai-thota [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2405 [term_id] => 35 ) [209] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2405 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-12-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-20 06:15:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Hari Bhai Thota : Supreme Court Observes That Exemption Under 240 A For MSME Applies At The Time Of Submission Of Resolution Plan [post_name] => hari-bhai-thota [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 2405 [term_id] => 244 ) [210] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1422 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-08-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-07 17:02:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HIGH COURT : POWERS AND JURISDICTION [post_name] => high-court-powers-and-jurisdiction [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1422 [term_id] => 162 ) [211] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1422 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-08-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-07 17:02:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HIGH COURT : POWERS AND JURISDICTION [post_name] => high-court-powers-and-jurisdiction [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1422 [term_id] => 242 ) [212] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1414 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-27 13:06:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW BILLS ARE PASSED BY STATE LEGISLATURE ? [post_name] => passing-of-bils-by-state-legislature [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1414 [term_id] => 162 ) [213] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1414 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-27 13:06:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW BILLS ARE PASSED BY STATE LEGISLATURE ? [post_name] => passing-of-bils-by-state-legislature [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1414 [term_id] => 242 ) [214] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10631 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2024-11-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-07 10:12:17 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW PRESIDENT OF USA IS ELECTED ? [post_name] => how-president-of-usa-is-elected [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 10631 [term_id] => 234 ) [215] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2368 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-12-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-07 12:30:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW SARDAR VALLABH BHAI PATEL INTEGRATED 562 PRINCELY STATES ? [post_name] => how-sardar-vallabh-bhai-patel-integrated-562-princely-states [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2368 [term_id] => 162 ) [216] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2368 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-12-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-07 12:30:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW SARDAR VALLABH BHAI PATEL INTEGRATED 562 PRINCELY STATES ? [post_name] => how-sardar-vallabh-bhai-patel-integrated-562-princely-states [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2368 [term_id] => 242 ) [217] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9788 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-03-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-22 12:39:22 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW TO FILE CHEQUE BOUNCING COMPLAINT ? [post_name] => how-to-file-cheque-bouncing-complaint [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9788 [term_id] => 162 ) [218] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10894 [slug] => everyday-law [date] => 2024-12-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-27 13:12:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW TO GET DIVORCE BY MUTUAL CONSENT UNDER HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 ? [post_name] => how-to-get-divorce-by-mutual-consent-under-hindu-marriage-act-1955 [name] => Everyday Law [object_id] => 10894 [term_id] => 233 ) [219] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10889 [slug] => everyday-law [date] => 2024-12-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-25 16:38:35 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW TO GET DIVORCE UNDER HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 ? [post_name] => how-to-get-divorce-under-hindu-marriage-act-1955-2 [name] => Everyday Law [object_id] => 10889 [term_id] => 233 ) [220] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11170 [slug] => everyday-law [date] => 2025-03-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-15 21:12:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW TO GET FIR REGISTERED ? [post_name] => how-to-get-fir-registered [name] => Everyday Law [object_id] => 11170 [term_id] => 233 ) [221] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10636 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-07 22:01:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HUSSAINARA KHATOON VS HOME SECRETARY, STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => hussainara-khatoon-vs-home-secretary-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10636 [term_id] => 35 ) [222] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10636 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-07 22:01:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HUSSAINARA KHATOON VS HOME SECRETARY, STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => hussainara-khatoon-vs-home-secretary-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10636 [term_id] => 245 ) [223] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9866 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-13 16:06:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => I R COELHO VS STATE OF TAMIL NADU : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => i-r-coelho-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9866 [term_id] => 35 ) [224] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9866 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-04-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-13 16:06:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => I R COELHO VS STATE OF TAMIL NADU : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => i-r-coelho-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9866 [term_id] => 245 ) [225] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10734 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-18 20:31:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => I. C. GOLAK NATH VS STATE OF PUNJAB : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => i-c-golak-nath-vs-state-of-punjab-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10734 [term_id] => 35 ) [226] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10734 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-18 20:31:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => I. C. GOLAK NATH VS STATE OF PUNJAB : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => i-c-golak-nath-vs-state-of-punjab-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10734 [term_id] => 245 ) [227] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2084 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-10-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-15 15:32:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IBBI Amends CIRP Regulations Regarding Timeline Of Filing Claims, Co-operation By Corporate Debtor Etc. [post_name] => ibbi-amends-cirp-regulations-in-respect-of-timeline-of-filing-claims-co-operation-by-corporate-debtor-etc [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2084 [term_id] => 162 ) [228] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1228 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-14 10:36:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IMPACT OF WELFARE STATE ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS [post_name] => fundamental-rights-and-welfare-state [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1228 [term_id] => 162 ) [229] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1228 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-14 10:36:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IMPACT OF WELFARE STATE ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS [post_name] => fundamental-rights-and-welfare-state [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1228 [term_id] => 242 ) [230] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9963 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-08 10:42:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IMPLEADEMENT APPLICATION FORMAT UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10 CPC [post_name] => impleadement-application-format-under-order-1-rule-10-cpc [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9963 [term_id] => 1 ) [231] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10604 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-25 12:00:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE : KESHAV SINGH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => in-re-keshav-singh-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10604 [term_id] => 35 ) [232] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10604 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-25 12:00:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE : KESHAV SINGH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => in-re-keshav-singh-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10604 [term_id] => 245 ) [233] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10653 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-10 21:03:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE : NOISE POLLUTION - IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LAWS FOR RESTRUCTURING USE OF LOUDSPEAKERS AND HIGH VOLUME PRODUCING SOUND SYSTEMS (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => in-re-noise-pollution-implementation-of-the-laws-for-restructuring-use-of-loudspeakers-and-high-volume-producing-sound-systems-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10653 [term_id] => 35 ) [234] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10653 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-10 21:03:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE : NOISE POLLUTION - IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LAWS FOR RESTRUCTURING USE OF LOUDSPEAKERS AND HIGH VOLUME PRODUCING SOUND SYSTEMS (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => in-re-noise-pollution-implementation-of-the-laws-for-restructuring-use-of-loudspeakers-and-high-volume-producing-sound-systems-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10653 [term_id] => 245 ) [235] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10621 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-10-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-20 00:13:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE : THE BERUBARI UNION AND EXCHANGE OF ENCLAVES (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => in-re-the-berubari-union-and-exchange-of-enclaves-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10621 [term_id] => 35 ) [236] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10621 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-10-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-20 00:13:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE : THE BERUBARI UNION AND EXCHANGE OF ENCLAVES (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => in-re-the-berubari-union-and-exchange-of-enclaves-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10621 [term_id] => 245 ) [237] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10770 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-21 22:00:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE: ARTICLE 370 OF THE CONSTITUTION (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => in-re-article-370-of-the-constitution-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10770 [term_id] => 35 ) [238] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10770 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-21 22:00:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE: ARTICLE 370 OF THE CONSTITUTION (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => in-re-article-370-of-the-constitution-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10770 [term_id] => 245 ) [239] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11540 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-05-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-06 20:37:36 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE: INTERPLAY BETWEEN ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS UNDER THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 AND THE INDIAN STAMP ACT 1899 : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => in-re-interplay-between-arbitration-agreements-under-the-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-and-the-indian-stamp-act-1899-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11540 [term_id] => 35 ) [240] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11068 [slug] => articles [date] => 2025-02-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-03 19:43:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDEPENDENT SUGAR CORPORATION LTD. VS GIRISH SRIRAM JUNEJA & ORS: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => independent-sugar-corporation-ltd-vs-girish-sriram-juneja-ors-case-summary [name] => Articles [object_id] => 11068 [term_id] => 162 ) [241] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11068 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2025-02-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-03 19:43:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDEPENDENT SUGAR CORPORATION LTD. VS GIRISH SRIRAM JUNEJA & ORS: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => independent-sugar-corporation-ltd-vs-girish-sriram-juneja-ors-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 11068 [term_id] => 244 ) [242] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10340 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-08 23:05:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDIA RESURGENCE ARC PVT. LTD. VS M/S AMIT METALIKS LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => india-resurgence-arc-pvt-ltd-vs-m-s-amit-metaliks-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10340 [term_id] => 35 ) [243] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10340 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-08 23:05:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDIA RESURGENCE ARC PVT. LTD. VS M/S AMIT METALIKS LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => india-resurgence-arc-pvt-ltd-vs-m-s-amit-metaliks-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10340 [term_id] => 244 ) [244] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11083 [slug] => articles [date] => 2025-02-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-12 22:02:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDIAN CONSITUTION VIS-À-VIS WORLD CONSTITUTIONS [post_name] => indian-consitution-vis-a-vis-world-constitutions [name] => Articles [object_id] => 11083 [term_id] => 162 ) [245] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11083 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2025-02-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-12 22:02:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDIAN CONSITUTION VIS-À-VIS WORLD CONSTITUTIONS [post_name] => indian-consitution-vis-a-vis-world-constitutions [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 11083 [term_id] => 242 ) [246] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2236 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-11-01 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-01 16:24:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDIAN FEDERALISM AND ITS CHALLENGES [post_name] => indian-federalism-and-its-challenges [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2236 [term_id] => 162 ) [247] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2236 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-11-01 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-01 16:24:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDIAN FEDERALISM AND ITS CHALLENGES [post_name] => indian-federalism-and-its-challenges [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2236 [term_id] => 242 ) [248] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10780 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-24 00:32:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION VS THE STATE OF KERALA (SABARIMALA JUDGMENT) [post_name] => indian-young-lawyers-association-vs-the-state-of-kerala-sabarimala-judgment [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10780 [term_id] => 35 ) [249] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10780 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-24 00:32:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION VS THE STATE OF KERALA (SABARIMALA JUDGMENT) [post_name] => indian-young-lawyers-association-vs-the-state-of-kerala-sabarimala-judgment [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10780 [term_id] => 245 ) [250] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9859 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-08 23:25:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDRA SAWHNEY VS UNION OF INDIA : SUPREME COURT STAMPS CASTE BASED RESERVATION [post_name] => indra-sawney-vs-union-of-india-supreme-court-stamps-caste-based-reservation [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9859 [term_id] => 35 ) [251] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9859 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-04-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-08 23:25:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDRA SAWHNEY VS UNION OF INDIA : SUPREME COURT STAMPS CASTE BASED RESERVATION [post_name] => indra-sawney-vs-union-of-india-supreme-court-stamps-caste-based-reservation [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9859 [term_id] => 245 ) [252] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10337 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-08 16:02:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDUS BIOTECH PVT. LTD. VS. KOTAK INDIA VENTURE (OFFSHORE FUND) : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => indus-biotech-pvt-ltd-vs-kotak-india-venture-offshore-fund-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10337 [term_id] => 35 ) [253] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10337 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-08 16:02:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDUS BIOTECH PVT. LTD. VS. KOTAK INDIA VENTURE (OFFSHORE FUND) : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => indus-biotech-pvt-ltd-vs-kotak-india-venture-offshore-fund-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10337 [term_id] => 244 ) [254] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10842 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 17:28:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INELIGIBILITY OF RESOLUTION APPLICANTS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => ineligibility-of-resolution-applicants-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10842 [term_id] => 170 ) [255] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10832 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 16:24:22 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INITIATION OF CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS (CIRP) UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => initiation-of-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-cirp-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10832 [term_id] => 170 ) [256] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10366 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-16 15:35:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INNOVENTIVE INDUSTRIES VS ICICI BANK & ANR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => innoventive-industries-vs-icici-bank-anr-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10366 [term_id] => 35 ) [257] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10366 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-16 15:35:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INNOVENTIVE INDUSTRIES VS ICICI BANK & ANR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => innoventive-industries-vs-icici-bank-anr-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10366 [term_id] => 244 ) [258] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9926 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-28 13:45:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA VS SATYANARAYAN BANKATLAL MALU : SESSIONS JUDGE OR ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE HAS JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN COMPLAINT UNDER IBC [post_name] => insolvency-and-bankruptcy-board-of-india-vs-satyanarayan-bankatlal-malu-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9926 [term_id] => 35 ) [259] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9926 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-04-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-28 13:45:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA VS SATYANARAYAN BANKATLAL MALU : SESSIONS JUDGE OR ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE HAS JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN COMPLAINT UNDER IBC [post_name] => insolvency-and-bankruptcy-board-of-india-vs-satyanarayan-bankatlal-malu-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 9926 [term_id] => 244 ) [260] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10880 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 19:50:24 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INSOLVENCY OF PERSONAL GUARANTORS OF CORPORATE DEBTOR UNDER IBC [post_name] => insolvency-of-personal-guarantors-of-corporate-debtor-under-ibc [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10880 [term_id] => 170 ) [261] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10876 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 19:37:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION OF FINANCIAL SERVICE PROVIDERS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => insolvency-resolution-of-financial-service-providers-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10876 [term_id] => 170 ) [262] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10782 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-24 14:10:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JANHIT ABHIYAN VS UNION OF INDIA : ONE HUNDRED AND THIRD AMENDMENT PROVIDING TEN PERCENT RESERVATION TO EWS CONSTITUTIONALLY VALID [post_name] => janhit-abhiyan-vs-union-of-india [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10782 [term_id] => 35 ) [263] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10782 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-24 14:10:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JANHIT ABHIYAN VS UNION OF INDIA : ONE HUNDRED AND THIRD AMENDMENT PROVIDING TEN PERCENT RESERVATION TO EWS CONSTITUTIONALLY VALID [post_name] => janhit-abhiyan-vs-union-of-india [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10782 [term_id] => 245 ) [264] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9862 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-04-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-09 22:29:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JARNAIL SINGH VS LACHHMI NARAIN GUPTA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jarnail-singh-vs-lachhmi-narain-gupta-case-summary [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9862 [term_id] => 162 ) [265] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9862 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-04-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-09 22:29:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JARNAIL SINGH VS LACHHMI NARAIN GUPTA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jarnail-singh-vs-lachhmi-narain-gupta-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9862 [term_id] => 245 ) [266] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10592 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-22 17:41:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JAYA BACHCHAN VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jaya-bachchan-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10592 [term_id] => 35 ) [267] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10592 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-22 17:41:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JAYA BACHCHAN VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jaya-bachchan-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10592 [term_id] => 245 ) [268] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10412 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-25 19:57:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JAYPEE KENSINGTON BOULEVARD APARTMENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION VS NBCC (INDIA ) LTD & ORS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jaypee-kensington-boulevard-apartments-welfare-association-vs-nbcc-india-ltd-ors-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10412 [term_id] => 35 ) [269] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10412 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-25 19:57:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JAYPEE KENSINGTON BOULEVARD APARTMENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION VS NBCC (INDIA ) LTD & ORS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jaypee-kensington-boulevard-apartments-welfare-association-vs-nbcc-india-ltd-ors-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10412 [term_id] => 244 ) [270] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10379 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-17 23:32:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JIGNESH SHAH VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jignesh-shah-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10379 [term_id] => 35 ) [271] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10379 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-17 23:32:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JIGNESH SHAH VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jignesh-shah-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10379 [term_id] => 244 ) [272] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10786 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-25 13:47:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JINDAL STAINLESS LTD VS. STATE OF HARYANA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jindal-stainless-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10786 [term_id] => 35 ) [273] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10786 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-25 13:47:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JINDAL STAINLESS LTD VS. STATE OF HARYANA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jindal-stainless-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10786 [term_id] => 245 ) [274] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9918 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-23 12:14:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JOSEPH SHINE VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => joseph-shine-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9918 [term_id] => 35 ) [275] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9918 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-04-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-23 12:14:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JOSEPH SHINE VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => joseph-shine-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9918 [term_id] => 245 ) [276] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2233 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-10-31 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-31 15:15:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN INDIA : WHETHER CONSTITUTIONAL NECESSITY OR ENCROACHMENT ON EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE DOMAIN [post_name] => judicial-activism-in-india-whether-constitutional-necessity-or-encroachment-on-executive-and-legislative-domain [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2233 [term_id] => 162 ) [277] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2233 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-10-31 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-31 15:15:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN INDIA : WHETHER CONSTITUTIONAL NECESSITY OR ENCROACHMENT ON EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE DOMAIN [post_name] => judicial-activism-in-india-whether-constitutional-necessity-or-encroachment-on-executive-and-legislative-domain [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2233 [term_id] => 242 ) [278] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1325 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-16 08:59:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JURISDICTION OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [post_name] => jurisdiction-of-the-surpreme-court [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1325 [term_id] => 162 ) [279] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1325 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-16 08:59:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JURISDICTION OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [post_name] => jurisdiction-of-the-surpreme-court [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1325 [term_id] => 242 ) [280] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10067 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-23 21:24:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JUSTICE K. S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD.) VS UNION OF INDIA ( AADHAAR JUDGMENT ) : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => justice-k-s-puttaswamy-retd-vs-union-of-india-aadhaar-judgment-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10067 [term_id] => 35 ) [281] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10067 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-23 21:24:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JUSTICE K. S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD.) VS UNION OF INDIA ( AADHAAR JUDGMENT ) : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => justice-k-s-puttaswamy-retd-vs-union-of-india-aadhaar-judgment-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10067 [term_id] => 245 ) [282] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10722 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 10:40:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => K C GAJAPATI NARAYAN DEO VS STATE OF ORISSA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => k-c-gajapati-narayan-deo-vs-state-of-orissa-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10722 [term_id] => 35 ) [283] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10722 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 10:40:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => K C GAJAPATI NARAYAN DEO VS STATE OF ORISSA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => k-c-gajapati-narayan-deo-vs-state-of-orissa-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10722 [term_id] => 245 ) [284] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10328 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-02 19:13:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => K KISHAN VS M/S VIJAY NIRMAN COMPANY PVT LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => k-kishan-vs-m-s-vijay-nirman-company-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10328 [term_id] => 35 ) [285] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10328 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-02 19:13:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => K KISHAN VS M/S VIJAY NIRMAN COMPANY PVT LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => k-kishan-vs-m-s-vijay-nirman-company-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10328 [term_id] => 244 ) [286] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10324 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-06-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-30 20:46:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => K SASHIDHAR VS INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => k-sashidhar-vs-indian-overseas-bank-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10324 [term_id] => 35 ) [287] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10324 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-06-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-30 20:46:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => K SASHIDHAR VS INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => k-sashidhar-vs-indian-overseas-bank-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10324 [term_id] => 244 ) [288] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10354 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-11 22:36:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => K. PARAMASIVAM VS THE KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => k-paramasivam-vs-the-karur-vysya-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10354 [term_id] => 35 ) [289] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10354 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-11 22:36:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => K. PARAMASIVAM VS THE KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => k-paramasivam-vs-the-karur-vysya-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10354 [term_id] => 244 ) [290] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9864 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-10 13:54:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KAILASH NATH ASSOCIATES VS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kailash-nath-associates-vs-delhi-development-authority-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9864 [term_id] => 35 ) [291] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10397 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-22 10:02:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KALPRAJ DHARMASHI VS KOTAK INVESTMENT ADVISORS LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kalpraj-dharmashi-vs-kotak-investment-advisors-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10397 [term_id] => 35 ) [292] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10397 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-22 10:02:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KALPRAJ DHARMASHI VS KOTAK INVESTMENT ADVISORS LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kalpraj-dharmashi-vs-kotak-investment-advisors-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10397 [term_id] => 244 ) [293] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10556 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-09 20:58:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KATZ VS UNITED STATES : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => katz-vs-united-states-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10556 [term_id] => 243 ) [294] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11556 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-05-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-29 12:26:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KAUSHAL KISHORE VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kaushal-kishore-vs-state-of-uttar-pradesh-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11556 [term_id] => 35 ) [295] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10375 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-17 14:16:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KAY BOUVET ENGINEERING LTD VS OVERSEAS INFRASTUCTURE PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kay-bouvet-engineering-ltd-vs-overseas-infrastucture-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10375 [term_id] => 35 ) [296] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10375 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-17 14:16:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KAY BOUVET ENGINEERING LTD VS OVERSEAS INFRASTUCTURE PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kay-bouvet-engineering-ltd-vs-overseas-infrastucture-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10375 [term_id] => 244 ) [297] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9629 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-02-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-05 13:22:50 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Keisham Meghachandra Singh Vs The Hon'ble Speaker Manipur Legislative Assembly : Case Summary [post_name] => keisham-meghachandra-singh-vs-the-honble-speaker-manipur-legislative-assembly-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9629 [term_id] => 35 ) [298] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9629 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-02-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-05 13:22:50 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Keisham Meghachandra Singh Vs The Hon'ble Speaker Manipur Legislative Assembly : Case Summary [post_name] => keisham-meghachandra-singh-vs-the-honble-speaker-manipur-legislative-assembly-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9629 [term_id] => 245 ) [299] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10789 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-26 14:54:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KESVANAND BHARATI VS STATE OF KERALA : BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE CONSTITUTION CANNOT BE AMENDED [post_name] => kesvanand-bharati-vs-state-of-kerala-basic-structure-of-the-constitution-cannot-be-amended [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10789 [term_id] => 35 ) [300] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10789 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-26 14:54:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KESVANAND BHARATI VS STATE OF KERALA : BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE CONSTITUTION CANNOT BE AMENDED [post_name] => kesvanand-bharati-vs-state-of-kerala-basic-structure-of-the-constitution-cannot-be-amended [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10789 [term_id] => 245 ) [301] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10663 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-13 10:54:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KHARAK SINGH VS STATE OF U.P. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kharak-singh-vs-state-of-u-p-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10663 [term_id] => 35 ) [302] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10663 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-13 10:54:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KHARAK SINGH VS STATE OF U.P. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kharak-singh-vs-state-of-u-p-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10663 [term_id] => 245 ) [303] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9817 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-29 16:08:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KIHOTO HOLLOHAN VS ZACHILLHU AND OTHERS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kihoto-hollohan-vs-zachillhu-and-others-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9817 [term_id] => 35 ) [304] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9817 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-03-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-29 16:08:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KIHOTO HOLLOHAN VS ZACHILLHU AND OTHERS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kihoto-hollohan-vs-zachillhu-and-others-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9817 [term_id] => 245 ) [305] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2389 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 16:11:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Koremastu Vs United States : Internment Of Only Japanese Americans Was Valid [post_name] => koremastu-vs-united-states-internment-of-only-japanese-americans-was-valid [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2389 [term_id] => 243 ) [306] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10608 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-27 12:52:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH VS STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => krishna-kumar-singh-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10608 [term_id] => 35 ) [307] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10608 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-27 12:52:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH VS STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => krishna-kumar-singh-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10608 [term_id] => 245 ) [308] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10033 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-22 19:00:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => L. CHANDRA KUMAR VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => l-chandra-kumar-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10033 [term_id] => 35 ) [309] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10033 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-22 19:00:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => L. CHANDRA KUMAR VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => l-chandra-kumar-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10033 [term_id] => 245 ) [310] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1215 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-06-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-10 07:46:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Lalit Kumar Jain VS Union of India & Ors : The Supreme Court Held Valid Notification Regarding Applicability Of IBC Provisions TO Personal Guarantors [post_name] => lalit-kumar-jain-vs-union-of-india [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 1215 [term_id] => 35 ) [311] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1215 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-06-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-10 07:46:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Lalit Kumar Jain VS Union of India & Ors : The Supreme Court Held Valid Notification Regarding Applicability Of IBC Provisions TO Personal Guarantors [post_name] => lalit-kumar-jain-vs-union-of-india [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 1215 [term_id] => 244 ) [312] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9979 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-12 13:07:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LALITA KUMARI VS GOVT OF UP : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => lalita-kumari-vs-govt-of-up-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9979 [term_id] => 35 ) [313] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9979 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-12 13:07:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LALITA KUMARI VS GOVT OF UP : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => lalita-kumari-vs-govt-of-up-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9979 [term_id] => 245 ) [314] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10560 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-10 18:42:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LAWRENCE VS TEXAS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => lawrence-vs-texas-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10560 [term_id] => 243 ) [315] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 364 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-02-13 16:56:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LAXMIPAT SURANA VS UNION BANK OF INDIA & ANR (CASE ANALYSIS) [post_name] => laxmipat-surana-vs-union-of-india [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 364 [term_id] => 35 ) [316] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 364 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-02-13 16:56:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LAXMIPAT SURANA VS UNION BANK OF INDIA & ANR (CASE ANALYSIS) [post_name] => laxmipat-surana-vs-union-of-india [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 364 [term_id] => 244 ) [317] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 738 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-05-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-21 17:54:58 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Legal Notice Format [post_name] => legal-notice-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 738 [term_id] => 1 ) [318] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 762 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-05-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-22 11:47:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Legal Notice Format Under Section 138 NI Act [post_name] => legal-notice-format-under-section-138-ni-act [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 762 [term_id] => 1 ) [319] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1430 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-08-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-10 14:31:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LEGISLATIVE RELATIONS BETWEEN UNION AND STATES [post_name] => legislative-relations-between-the-union-and-states [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1430 [term_id] => 162 ) [320] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1430 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-08-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-10 14:31:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LEGISLATIVE RELATIONS BETWEEN UNION AND STATES [post_name] => legislative-relations-between-the-union-and-states [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1430 [term_id] => 242 ) [321] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10846 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 17:44:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LIABILITY FOR PRIOR OFFENCES UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => liability-for-prior-offences-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10846 [term_id] => 170 ) [322] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10850 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 17:57:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LIQUIDATION OF CORPORATE DEBTOR UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => liquidation-of-corporate-debtor-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10850 [term_id] => 170 ) [323] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10856 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 18:21:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LIQUIDATON ESTATE AND REALISATION OF ASSETS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => liquidaton-estate-and-realisation-of-assets-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10856 [term_id] => 170 ) [324] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2385 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 15:58:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Lochner Vs New York : State Can Not Prescribe Maximum Hours For Workers [post_name] => lochner-vs-new-york-state-can-not-prescribe-maximum-hours-for-workers [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2385 [term_id] => 243 ) [325] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10589 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-15 15:00:03 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LOPER BRIGHT ENTERPRISES VS RAIMONDO : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => loper-bright-enterprises-vs-raimondo-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10589 [term_id] => 243 ) [326] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10544 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-08 21:33:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LOVING VS VIRGINIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => loving-vs-virginia-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10544 [term_id] => 243 ) [327] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10711 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-15 19:26:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M C MEHTA VS KAMAL NATH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-c-mehta-vs-kamal-nath-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10711 [term_id] => 35 ) [328] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10711 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-15 19:26:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M C MEHTA VS KAMAL NATH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-c-mehta-vs-kamal-nath-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10711 [term_id] => 245 ) [329] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10713 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-15 22:52:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M C MEHTA VS UNION OF INDIA (OLEUM LEAK CASE) [post_name] => m-c-mehta-vs-union-of-india-oleum-leak-case [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10713 [term_id] => 35 ) [330] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10713 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-15 22:52:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M C MEHTA VS UNION OF INDIA (OLEUM LEAK CASE) [post_name] => m-c-mehta-vs-union-of-india-oleum-leak-case [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10713 [term_id] => 245 ) [331] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10732 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-18 12:38:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M NAGARAJ VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-nagaraj-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10732 [term_id] => 35 ) [332] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10732 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-18 12:38:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M NAGARAJ VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-nagaraj-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10732 [term_id] => 245 ) [333] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10645 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-09 19:05:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M. H. HOSKOT VS STATE OF MAHARASTRA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-h-hoskot-vs-state-of-maharastra-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10645 [term_id] => 35 ) [334] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10645 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-09 19:05:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M. H. HOSKOT VS STATE OF MAHARASTRA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-h-hoskot-vs-state-of-maharastra-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10645 [term_id] => 245 ) [335] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10441 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-08-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-13 13:35:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M. R. BALAJI VS STATE OF MYSORE : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-r-balaji-vs-state-of-mysore-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10441 [term_id] => 35 ) [336] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10441 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-08-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-13 13:35:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M. R. BALAJI VS STATE OF MYSORE : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-r-balaji-vs-state-of-mysore-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10441 [term_id] => 245 ) [337] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 646 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-05-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-15 07:11:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M. Suresh Kumar Reddy VS. Canara Bank (Case Summary ) [post_name] => m-suresh-kumar-reddy-vs-canara-bank [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 646 [term_id] => 35 ) [338] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 646 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-05-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-15 07:11:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M. Suresh Kumar Reddy VS. Canara Bank (Case Summary ) [post_name] => m-suresh-kumar-reddy-vs-canara-bank [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 646 [term_id] => 244 ) [339] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10373 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-17 11:11:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M/s JAI BALA JI INDUSTRIES VS. D. K. MOHANTI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-s-jai-bala-ji-industries-vs-d-k-mohanti-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10373 [term_id] => 35 ) [340] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10373 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-17 11:11:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M/s JAI BALA JI INDUSTRIES VS. D. K. MOHANTI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-s-jai-bala-ji-industries-vs-d-k-mohanti-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10373 [term_id] => 244 ) [341] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10381 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-18 23:12:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M/S ORATOR MARKETING PVT. LTD. VS M/S SAMTEX DESINZ PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-s-orator-marketing-pvt-ltd-vs-m-s-samtex-desinz-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10381 [term_id] => 35 ) [342] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10381 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-18 23:12:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M/S ORATOR MARKETING PVT. LTD. VS M/S SAMTEX DESINZ PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-s-orator-marketing-pvt-ltd-vs-m-s-samtex-desinz-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10381 [term_id] => 244 ) [343] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10410 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-24 21:23:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M/S SURENDRA TRADING COMPANY VS M/S JUGGILAL KAMLAPAT JUTE MILLS COMPANY LTD AND OTHERS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-s-surendra-trading-company-vs-m-s-juggilal-kamlapat-jute-mills-company-ltd-and-others-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10410 [term_id] => 35 ) [344] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10410 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-24 21:23:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M/S SURENDRA TRADING COMPANY VS M/S JUGGILAL KAMLAPAT JUTE MILLS COMPANY LTD AND OTHERS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-s-surendra-trading-company-vs-m-s-juggilal-kamlapat-jute-mills-company-ltd-and-others-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10410 [term_id] => 244 ) [345] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10407 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-24 18:23:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MACQUARIE BANK LTD VS SHILPI CABLE TECHNOLOGIES LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => macquarie-bank-ltd-vs-shilpi-cable-technologies-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10407 [term_id] => 35 ) [346] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10407 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-24 18:23:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MACQUARIE BANK LTD VS SHILPI CABLE TECHNOLOGIES LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => macquarie-bank-ltd-vs-shilpi-cable-technologies-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10407 [term_id] => 244 ) [347] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10023 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-21 13:29:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MADRAS BAR ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA (2020) : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => madras-bar-association-vs-union-of-india-2020-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10023 [term_id] => 35 ) [348] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10023 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-21 13:29:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MADRAS BAR ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA (2020) : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => madras-bar-association-vs-union-of-india-2020-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10023 [term_id] => 245 ) [349] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10331 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-07 19:00:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MAHARASTRA SEAMLESS VS PADMANABHAN VENKATESH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => maharastra-seamless-vs-padmanabhan-venkatesh-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10331 [term_id] => 35 ) [350] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10331 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-07 19:00:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MAHARASTRA SEAMLESS VS PADMANABHAN VENKATESH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => maharastra-seamless-vs-padmanabhan-venkatesh-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10331 [term_id] => 244 ) [351] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9732 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-02-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-27 16:34:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MANEKA GANDHI VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => maneka-gandhi-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9732 [term_id] => 35 ) [352] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9732 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-02-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-27 16:34:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MANEKA GANDHI VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => maneka-gandhi-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9732 [term_id] => 245 ) [353] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10420 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-27 22:43:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MANISH KUMAR VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => manish-kumar-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10420 [term_id] => 35 ) [354] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10420 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-27 22:43:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MANISH KUMAR VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => manish-kumar-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10420 [term_id] => 244 ) [355] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2379 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 15:38:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Marbury Vs Madison : Supreme Court has power of judicial review [post_name] => marbury-vs-madison-supreme-court-has-power-of-judicial-review [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2379 [term_id] => 243 ) [356] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10709 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-15 12:14:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MARU RAM VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => maru-ram-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10709 [term_id] => 35 ) [357] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10709 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-15 12:14:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MARU RAM VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => maru-ram-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10709 [term_id] => 245 ) [358] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10537 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-07 18:14:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MCCULLOCH VS. MARYLAND : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => mcculloch-vs-maryland-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10537 [term_id] => 243 ) [359] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10562 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-11 14:04:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MICHAEL H VS GERALD D. : CASE SUMMRAY [post_name] => michael-h-vs-gerald-d-case-summray [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10562 [term_id] => 243 ) [360] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10010 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-14 12:52:36 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MINERVA MILLS LTD VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => minerva-mills-ltd-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10010 [term_id] => 35 ) [361] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10010 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-14 12:52:36 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MINERVA MILLS LTD VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => minerva-mills-ltd-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10010 [term_id] => 245 ) [362] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2401 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 16:47:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Miranda Vs Arizona : Accused Has To Be Informed About His Right To Remain Silent During Interrogation [post_name] => miranda-vs-arizona-accused-has-to-be-informed-about-his-right-to-remain-silent-during-interrogation [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2401 [term_id] => 243 ) [363] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10724 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 12:40:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MISS MOHINI JAIN VS STATE OF KARNATAKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => miss-mohini-jain-vs-state-of-karnataka-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10724 [term_id] => 35 ) [364] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10724 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 12:40:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MISS MOHINI JAIN VS STATE OF KARNATAKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => miss-mohini-jain-vs-state-of-karnataka-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10724 [term_id] => 244 ) [365] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9499 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-01-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-26 07:43:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MOBILE AND INTERNET ASSOCIATION OF INDIA VS RESERVE BANK OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => mobile-and-internet-association-of-india-vs-reserve-bank-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9499 [term_id] => 35 ) [366] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1185 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-05 12:38:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. VS Kirusa Software Pvt. Ltd. ( Case Summary ) [post_name] => mobilox-innovtions-pvt-ltd-vs-kirusa-software-pvt-ltd-case-analysis [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1185 [term_id] => 162 ) [367] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1185 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-05 12:38:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. VS Kirusa Software Pvt. Ltd. ( Case Summary ) [post_name] => mobilox-innovtions-pvt-ltd-vs-kirusa-software-pvt-ltd-case-analysis [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1185 [term_id] => 170 ) [368] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11062 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2025-01-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-01-09 20:08:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MOHAMMED ENTERPRISES ( TANZANIA ) LTD. VS FAROOQ ALI KHAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => mohammed-enterprises-tanzania-ltd-vs-farooq-ali-khan-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 11062 [term_id] => 244 ) [369] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10726 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 17:43:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MOHD AHAMAD KHAN VS SHAH BANO : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => mohd-ahamad-khan-vs-shah-bano-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10726 [term_id] => 35 ) [370] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10726 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 17:43:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MOHD AHAMAD KHAN VS SHAH BANO : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => mohd-ahamad-khan-vs-shah-bano-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10726 [term_id] => 245 ) [371] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1197 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-08 13:01:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Moratorium Under IBC [post_name] => moratorium-under-ibc [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1197 [term_id] => 162 ) [372] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1197 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-08 13:01:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Moratorium Under IBC [post_name] => moratorium-under-ibc [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1197 [term_id] => 170 ) [373] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 631 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-05-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-09 12:05:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Moser Baer Karamchari Union VS Union Of India And Ors (Case Summary) [post_name] => moser-baer-karamchari-union-vs-union-of-india [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 631 [term_id] => 35 ) [374] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 631 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-05-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-09 12:05:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Moser Baer Karamchari Union VS Union Of India And Ors (Case Summary) [post_name] => moser-baer-karamchari-union-vs-union-of-india [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 631 [term_id] => 244 ) [375] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2227 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-10-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-29 16:55:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MOUNTING JUDICIAL PENDENCIES AND ARREARS : IS THERE A WAY AHEAD ? [post_name] => mounting-judicial-pendencies-and-arrears-is-there-a-way-ahead [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2227 [term_id] => 162 ) [376] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2227 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-10-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-29 16:55:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MOUNTING JUDICIAL PENDENCIES AND ARREARS : IS THERE A WAY AHEAD ? [post_name] => mounting-judicial-pendencies-and-arrears-is-there-a-way-ahead [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2227 [term_id] => 242 ) [377] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9883 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-19 14:33:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UJJAIN VS BVG INDIA LTD: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => municipal-corporation-ujjain-vs-bvg-india-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9883 [term_id] => 35 ) [378] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10389 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-20 11:25:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NAGAITLANG DHAR VS. PANNA PRAGATI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. & ORS. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => nagaitlang-dhar-vs-panna-pragati-infrastructure-pvt-ltd-ors-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10389 [term_id] => 35 ) [379] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10389 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-20 11:25:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NAGAITLANG DHAR VS. PANNA PRAGATI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. & ORS. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => nagaitlang-dhar-vs-panna-pragati-infrastructure-pvt-ltd-ors-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10389 [term_id] => 244 ) [380] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11551 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-05-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-24 12:30:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NANDINI SUNDAR VS STATE OF CHATTISGARH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => nandini-sundar-vs-state-of-chattisgarh-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11551 [term_id] => 35 ) [381] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11551 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2025-05-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-24 12:30:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NANDINI SUNDAR VS STATE OF CHATTISGARH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => nandini-sundar-vs-state-of-chattisgarh-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 11551 [term_id] => 245 ) [382] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9786 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-20 22:17:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => national-legal-services-authority-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9786 [term_id] => 35 ) [383] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10321 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-06-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-30 13:20:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NATIONAL SPOT EXCHANGE LTD VS MR. ANIL KOHLI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => national-spot-exchange-ltd-vs-mr-anil-kohli-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10321 [term_id] => 35 ) [384] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10321 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-06-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-30 13:20:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NATIONAL SPOT EXCHANGE LTD VS MR. ANIL KOHLI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => national-spot-exchange-ltd-vs-mr-anil-kohli-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10321 [term_id] => 244 ) [385] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10760 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-19 17:31:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NAVEEN JINDAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => naveen-jindal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10760 [term_id] => 35 ) [386] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10760 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-19 17:31:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NAVEEN JINDAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => naveen-jindal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10760 [term_id] => 245 ) [387] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10326 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-02 12:00:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL VS. MINOSHA INDIA LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => new-delhi-municipal-council-vs-minosha-india-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10326 [term_id] => 35 ) [388] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10326 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-02 12:00:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL VS. MINOSHA INDIA LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => new-delhi-municipal-council-vs-minosha-india-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10326 [term_id] => 244 ) [389] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10405 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-24 11:25:24 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. ANAND SONBHADRA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => new-okhla-industrial-development-authority-vs-anand-sonbhadra-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10405 [term_id] => 35 ) [390] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10405 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-24 11:25:24 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. ANAND SONBHADRA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => new-okhla-industrial-development-authority-vs-anand-sonbhadra-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10405 [term_id] => 244 ) [391] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10568 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-13 11:14:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NEW YORK TIMES VS UNITED STATES : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => new-york-times-vs-united-states-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10568 [term_id] => 243 ) [392] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10065 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-23 14:31:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NOVARTIS AG VS UNION OF INDIA: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => novartis-ag-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10065 [term_id] => 35 ) [393] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10572 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-14 10:37:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => OBERGEFELL VS HODGES : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => obergefell-vs-hodges-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10572 [term_id] => 243 ) [394] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11086 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 10:57:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => OBJECTIVES OF PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => objectives-of-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11086 [term_id] => 241 ) [395] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10884 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 20:04:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => OFFENCES AND PENALTIES UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => offences-and-penalties-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10884 [term_id] => 170 ) [396] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1332 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-21 17:31:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => OFFICE OF GOVERNOR : WHETHER CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD OF STATE OR AGENT OF CENTRE ? [post_name] => office-of-governor-whether-constitutional-head-of-state-or-agent-of-centre [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1332 [term_id] => 162 ) [397] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1332 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-21 17:31:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => OFFICE OF GOVERNOR : WHETHER CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD OF STATE OR AGENT OF CENTRE ? [post_name] => office-of-governor-whether-constitutional-head-of-state-or-agent-of-centre [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1332 [term_id] => 242 ) [398] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2242 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-11-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-03 15:16:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ONE NATION ONE ELECTION : WHETHER FEASIBLE PROPOSITION ? [post_name] => one-nation-one-election-whether-feasible-proposition [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2242 [term_id] => 162 ) [399] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2242 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-11-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-03 15:16:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ONE NATION ONE ELECTION : WHETHER FEASIBLE PROPOSITION ? [post_name] => one-nation-one-election-whether-feasible-proposition [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2242 [term_id] => 242 ) [400] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9740 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-02 07:30:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => P RAMA CHANDRA RAO VS STATE OF KARNATKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => p-rama-chandra-rao-vs-state-of-karnatka-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9740 [term_id] => 35 ) [401] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10358 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-12 21:22:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => P. MOHANRAJ & ORS VS. M/S SHAH BROTHERS ISPAT PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => p-mohanraj-ors-vs-m-s-shah-brothers-ispat-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10358 [term_id] => 35 ) [402] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10358 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-12 21:22:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => P. MOHANRAJ & ORS VS. M/S SHAH BROTHERS ISPAT PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => p-mohanraj-ors-vs-m-s-shah-brothers-ispat-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10358 [term_id] => 244 ) [403] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10597 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-23 14:31:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PANDIT M. S. M. SHARMA VS SRI KRISHAN SINHA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => pandit-m-s-m-sharma-vs-sri-krishan-sinha-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10597 [term_id] => 35 ) [404] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10597 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-23 14:31:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PANDIT M. S. M. SHARMA VS SRI KRISHAN SINHA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => pandit-m-s-m-sharma-vs-sri-krishan-sinha-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10597 [term_id] => 245 ) [405] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1291 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-08 12:53:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PARLIAMENTARY CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL MATTERS [post_name] => parliamentary-control-over-financial-matters [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1291 [term_id] => 162 ) [406] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1291 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-08 12:53:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PARLIAMENTARY CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL MATTERS [post_name] => parliamentary-control-over-financial-matters [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1291 [term_id] => 242 ) [407] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11070 [slug] => articles [date] => 2025-02-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-04 12:25:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PARTS OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => parts-of-indian-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 11070 [term_id] => 162 ) [408] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11070 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2025-02-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-04 12:25:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PARTS OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => parts-of-indian-constitution [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 11070 [term_id] => 242 ) [409] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1329 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-19 06:21:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd. VS Raman Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (Case Summary) [post_name] => paschimanchal-vidyut-vitaran-nigam-ltd-vs-raman-ispat-pvt-ltd [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1329 [term_id] => 162 ) [410] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1329 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-07-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-19 06:21:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd. VS Raman Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (Case Summary) [post_name] => paschimanchal-vidyut-vitaran-nigam-ltd-vs-raman-ispat-pvt-ltd [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1329 [term_id] => 170 ) [411] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1287 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-07 12:39:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PASSING OF MONEY BILLS BY PARLIAMENT [post_name] => passing-of-money-bills-by-indian-parliament [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1287 [term_id] => 162 ) [412] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1287 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-07 12:39:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PASSING OF MONEY BILLS BY PARLIAMENT [post_name] => passing-of-money-bills-by-indian-parliament [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1287 [term_id] => 242 ) [413] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1284 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-04 12:33:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PASSING OF ORDINARY BILLS BY PARLIAMENT [post_name] => passing-of-ordinary-bills-by-parliament [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1284 [term_id] => 162 ) [414] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1284 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-04 12:33:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PASSING OF ORDINARY BILLS BY PARLIAMENT [post_name] => passing-of-ordinary-bills-by-parliament [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1284 [term_id] => 242 ) [415] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10362 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-14 18:05:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PHOENIX ARC PVT. LTD. VS. SPADE FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => phoenix-arc-pvt-ltd-vs-spade-financial-services-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10362 [term_id] => 35 ) [416] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10362 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-14 18:05:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PHOENIX ARC PVT. LTD. VS. SPADE FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => phoenix-arc-pvt-ltd-vs-spade-financial-services-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10362 [term_id] => 244 ) [417] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 376 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-02-13 17:32:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PIONEER URBAN LAND & ORS VS. UNION OF INDIA (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => pioneer-urban-land [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 376 [term_id] => 35 ) [418] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 376 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-02-13 17:32:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PIONEER URBAN LAND & ORS VS. UNION OF INDIA (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => pioneer-urban-land [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 376 [term_id] => 244 ) [419] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1273 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-07-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-03 00:24:46 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Plessy VS Ferguson : Separate Treatment To White And Colored Persons Are Valid [post_name] => plessy-vs-ferguson-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 1273 [term_id] => 243 ) [420] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 745 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-05-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-21 18:06:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Police Complaint Format [post_name] => police-complaint [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 745 [term_id] => 1 ) [421] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10828 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 16:06:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => POSITION OF HOME BUYERS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => position-of-home-buyers-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10828 [term_id] => 162 ) [422] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10828 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 16:06:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => POSITION OF HOME BUYERS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => position-of-home-buyers-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10828 [term_id] => 170 ) [423] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1294 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-09 16:31:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => POWER OF THE PRESIDENT TO ISSUE ORDINANCE UNDER ARTICLE 123 [post_name] => power-of-president-to-issue-ordinance [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1294 [term_id] => 162 ) [424] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1294 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-09 16:31:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => POWER OF THE PRESIDENT TO ISSUE ORDINANCE UNDER ARTICLE 123 [post_name] => power-of-president-to-issue-ordinance [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1294 [term_id] => 242 ) [425] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9841 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-04-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-04 18:56:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => POWER OF THE SUPREME COURT TO DO COMPLETE JUSTICE UNDER ARTICLE 142 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA [post_name] => power-of-the-supreme-court-to-do-complete-justice-under-article-142-of-the-constitution-of-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9841 [term_id] => 162 ) [426] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10834 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 16:34:17 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => POWERS AND DUTIES OF INTERIM RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => powers-and-duties-of-interim-resolution-professional-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10834 [term_id] => 170 ) [427] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1240 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-18 08:23:46 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF PRESIDENT OF INDIA [post_name] => the-president-of-india-and-his-constitutional-position [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1240 [term_id] => 162 ) [428] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1240 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-18 08:23:46 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF PRESIDENT OF INDIA [post_name] => the-president-of-india-and-his-constitutional-position [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1240 [term_id] => 242 ) [429] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9875 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-14 11:23:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRADEEP KUMAR BISWAS VS INDIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL BIOLOGY : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => pradeep-kumar-biswas-vs-indian-institute-of-chemical-biology-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9875 [term_id] => 35 ) [430] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9875 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-04-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-14 11:23:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRADEEP KUMAR BISWAS VS INDIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL BIOLOGY : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => pradeep-kumar-biswas-vs-indian-institute-of-chemical-biology-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9875 [term_id] => 245 ) [431] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9734 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-02-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-28 05:07:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRAMATI EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL TRUST VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => pramati-educational-and-cultural-trust-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9734 [term_id] => 35 ) [432] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9734 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-02-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-28 05:07:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRAMATI EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL TRUST VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => pramati-educational-and-cultural-trust-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9734 [term_id] => 245 ) [433] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10387 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-19 23:35:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRATAP TECHNOCRATS (P) LTD. & ORS VS MONITORING COMMITTEE OF RELIANCE INFRATEL LTD. & ANR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => pratap-technocrats-p-ltd-ors-vs-monitoring-committee-of-reliance-infratel-ltd-anr-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10387 [term_id] => 35 ) [434] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10387 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-19 23:35:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRATAP TECHNOCRATS (P) LTD. & ORS VS MONITORING COMMITTEE OF RELIANCE INFRATEL LTD. & ANR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => pratap-technocrats-p-ltd-ors-vs-monitoring-committee-of-reliance-infratel-ltd-anr-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10387 [term_id] => 244 ) [435] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10870 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 19:22:36 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRE-PACKAGED INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => pre-packaged-insolvency-resolution-process-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10870 [term_id] => 170 ) [436] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 546 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-04-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-17 11:23:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PREAMBLE TO THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => preamble-to-the-indian-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 546 [term_id] => 162 ) [437] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 546 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-04-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-17 11:23:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PREAMBLE TO THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => preamble-to-the-indian-constitution [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 546 [term_id] => 242 ) [438] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10639 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-08 09:27:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PREM SHANKAR SHUKLA VS DELHI ADMINISTRATION : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => prem-shankar-shukla-vs-delhi-administration-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10639 [term_id] => 35 ) [439] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10639 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-08 09:27:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PREM SHANKAR SHUKLA VS DELHI ADMINISTRATION : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => prem-shankar-shukla-vs-delhi-administration-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10639 [term_id] => 245 ) [440] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2230 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-10-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-30 16:06:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRESSURE GROUPS IN INDIA AND THIER REGULATION [post_name] => pressure-groups-in-india-and-their-regulation [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2230 [term_id] => 162 ) [441] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2230 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-10-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-30 16:06:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRESSURE GROUPS IN INDIA AND THIER REGULATION [post_name] => pressure-groups-in-india-and-their-regulation [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2230 [term_id] => 242 ) [442] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10071 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-05-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-26 23:47:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND CLIENT [post_name] => privileged-communication-between-advocate-and-client [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10071 [term_id] => 162 ) [443] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10071 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-05-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-26 23:47:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND CLIENT [post_name] => privileged-communication-between-advocate-and-client [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 10071 [term_id] => 246 ) [444] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11105 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 19:12:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PROCEDURE OF FILING APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 12 OF PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => procedure-of-filing-application-under-section-12-of-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11105 [term_id] => 241 ) [445] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9800 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-03-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-25 16:50:58 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT BY ADVOCATES AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS [post_name] => professional-misconduct-by-advocates-and-disciplinary-proceedings [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9800 [term_id] => 162 ) [446] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9800 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-03-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-25 16:50:58 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT BY ADVOCATES AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS [post_name] => professional-misconduct-by-advocates-and-disciplinary-proceedings [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 9800 [term_id] => 246 ) [447] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10836 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 16:40:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT AND COLLATION OF CLAIMS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => public-announcement-and-collation-of-claims-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10836 [term_id] => 170 ) [448] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10799 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-11-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-29 12:45:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PUBLIC INTEREST FOUNDATION VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => public-interest-foundation-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10799 [term_id] => 162 ) [449] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10799 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-29 12:45:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PUBLIC INTEREST FOUNDATION VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => public-interest-foundation-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10799 [term_id] => 245 ) [450] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9838 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-04-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-04 13:49:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION IN INDIA AND ITS ABUSES [post_name] => public-interest-litigation-in-india-and-its-abuses [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9838 [term_id] => 162 ) [451] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9950 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-05 12:13:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION UNDER ARTICLE 32 FORMAT [post_name] => public-interest-litigation-under-article-32-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9950 [term_id] => 1 ) [452] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9877 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-04-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-16 10:15:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => QUASHING PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 CRPC FORMAT [post_name] => quashing-petition-under-section-482-crpc-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9877 [term_id] => 1 ) [453] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11422 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2025-03-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-27 18:39:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => QUESTIONS OF LAW, SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW, SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW OF GENERAL IMPORTANCE AND SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS TO INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION [post_name] => questions-of-law-substantial-questions-of-law-substantial-questions-of-law-of-general-importance-and-substantial-questions-of-law-as-to-interpretation-of-the-constitution [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 11422 [term_id] => 242 ) [454] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10368 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-16 18:28:17 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RADHA EXPORTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD VS K P JAYARAM & ORS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => radha-exports-india-pvt-ltd-vs-k-p-jayaram-ors-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10368 [term_id] => 35 ) [455] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10368 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-16 18:28:17 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RADHA EXPORTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD VS K P JAYARAM & ORS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => radha-exports-india-pvt-ltd-vs-k-p-jayaram-ors-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10368 [term_id] => 244 ) [456] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10459 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-08-31 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-31 16:42:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAI SAHIB RAM JAWAYA KAPUR VS STATE OF PUNJAB : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rai-sahib-ram-jawaya-kapur-vs-state-of-punjab-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10459 [term_id] => 35 ) [457] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10459 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-08-31 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-31 16:42:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAI SAHIB RAM JAWAYA KAPUR VS STATE OF PUNJAB : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rai-sahib-ram-jawaya-kapur-vs-state-of-punjab-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10459 [term_id] => 245 ) [458] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10599 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-24 00:04:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAJA RAM PAL VS HON’BLE SPEAKER , LOK SABHA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => raja-ram-pal-vs-honble-speaker-lok-sabha-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10599 [term_id] => 35 ) [459] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10599 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-24 00:04:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAJA RAM PAL VS HON’BLE SPEAKER , LOK SABHA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => raja-ram-pal-vs-honble-speaker-lok-sabha-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10599 [term_id] => 245 ) [460] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10371 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-16 21:28:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAJENDRA NAROTTAM DAS SHETH VS. CHANDRA PRAKASH JAIN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rajendra-narottam-das-sheth-vs-chandra-prakash-jain-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10371 [term_id] => 35 ) [461] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10371 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-16 21:28:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAJENDRA NAROTTAM DAS SHETH VS. CHANDRA PRAKASH JAIN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rajendra-narottam-das-sheth-vs-chandra-prakash-jain-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10371 [term_id] => 244 ) [462] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11528 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-04-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-04-30 19:31:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAKESH BHANOT VS M/S GURDAS AGRO PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rakesh-bhanot-vs-m-s-gurdas-agro-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11528 [term_id] => 35 ) [463] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11528 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2025-04-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-04-30 19:31:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAKESH BHANOT VS M/S GURDAS AGRO PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rakesh-bhanot-vs-m-s-gurdas-agro-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 11528 [term_id] => 244 ) [464] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10016 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-14 23:10:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAMESHWAR PRASAD VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rameshwar-prasad-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10016 [term_id] => 35 ) [465] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10016 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-14 23:10:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAMESHWAR PRASAD VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rameshwar-prasad-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10016 [term_id] => 245 ) [466] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2333 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-11-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-25 04:17:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Ramkrishna Forgings Ltd Vs. Ravindra Loonkar: NCLT Direction For Fresh Valuation Of Assets After Approval Of Resolution Plan By CoC Was Not Justified [post_name] => ramkrishna-forgings-ltd-vs-ravindra-loonkar-nclt-direction-for-fresh-valuation-of-assets-after-approval-of-resolution-plan-by-coc-was-not-justified [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2333 [term_id] => 35 ) [467] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2333 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-11-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-25 04:17:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Ramkrishna Forgings Ltd Vs. Ravindra Loonkar: NCLT Direction For Fresh Valuation Of Assets After Approval Of Resolution Plan By CoC Was Not Justified [post_name] => ramkrishna-forgings-ltd-vs-ravindra-loonkar-nclt-direction-for-fresh-valuation-of-assets-after-approval-of-resolution-plan-by-coc-was-not-justified [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 2333 [term_id] => 244 ) [468] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11148 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2025-03-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-09 23:48:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RECUSAL OF JUDGE FROM HEARING AND FORUM SHOPPING [post_name] => recusal-of-judge-from-hearing-and-forum-shopping [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 11148 [term_id] => 246 ) [469] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1317 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-12 17:31:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Rejection Of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC [post_name] => rejection-of-plaint-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1317 [term_id] => 162 ) [470] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10830 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 16:13:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RELATED PARTIES AND THEIR DISABILITIES UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => related-parties-and-their-disabilities-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10830 [term_id] => 170 ) [471] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11107 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 19:43:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RELIEFS UNDER PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => reliefs-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11107 [term_id] => 241 ) [472] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10570 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-13 14:03:07 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RENO VS ACLU : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => reno-vs-aclu-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10570 [term_id] => 243 ) [473] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10864 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 18:47:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => REPORTING DURING LIQUIDATION UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => reporting-during-liquidation-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10864 [term_id] => 170 ) [474] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11144 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2025-03-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-07 13:45:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => REPORTING OF SUB JUDICE MATTERS AND FAIR TRIAL [post_name] => reporting-of-sub-judice-matters-and-fair-trial [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 11144 [term_id] => 246 ) [475] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10844 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 17:38:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RESOLUTION PLAN UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => resolution-plan-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10844 [term_id] => 170 ) [476] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10659 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-12 19:55:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => REV. STAINISLAUS VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rev-stainislaus-vs-state-of-madhya-pradesh-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10659 [term_id] => 35 ) [477] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10659 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-12 19:55:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => REV. STAINISLAUS VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rev-stainislaus-vs-state-of-madhya-pradesh-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10659 [term_id] => 245 ) [478] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9954 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-05 19:40:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => REVIEW PETITION FORMAT UNDER ARTICLE 137 [post_name] => review-petition-format-under-article-137 [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9954 [term_id] => 1 ) [479] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9844 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-04-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-04 21:29:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => REVIEW POWERS OF THE SUPREME COURT UNDER ARTICLE 137 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA [post_name] => review-powers-of-the-supreme-court-under-article-137-of-the-constitution-of-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9844 [term_id] => 162 ) [480] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10854 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 18:13:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => REVIVAL UNDER LIQUIDATION UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => revival-under-liquidation-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10854 [term_id] => 170 ) [481] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10583 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-15 12:13:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => REYNOLDS VS SIMS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => reynolds-vs-sims-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10583 [term_id] => 243 ) [482] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1208 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-09 08:34:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT AGAINST EXPLOITATOIN (ARTICLE 23 AND ARTICLE 24) [post_name] => right-against-exploitation-article-23-and-article-24 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1208 [term_id] => 162 ) [483] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1208 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-09 08:34:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT AGAINST EXPLOITATOIN (ARTICLE 23 AND ARTICLE 24) [post_name] => right-against-exploitation-article-23-and-article-24 [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1208 [term_id] => 242 ) [484] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10082 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-05-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-27 21:46:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT OF AN ADVOCATE TO PRACTICE LAW IN INDIA [post_name] => right-of-an-advocate-to-practice-law-in-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10082 [term_id] => 162 ) [485] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10082 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-05-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-27 21:46:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT OF AN ADVOCATE TO PRACTICE LAW IN INDIA [post_name] => right-of-an-advocate-to-practice-law-in-india [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 10082 [term_id] => 246 ) [486] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 877 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-05-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-27 14:28:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT OF ARRESTED PERSONS AND PREVENTIVE DETENTION (ARTICLE 22) [post_name] => right-of-arrested-persons-and-preventive-detention-article-22 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 877 [term_id] => 162 ) [487] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 877 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-05-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-27 14:28:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT OF ARRESTED PERSONS AND PREVENTIVE DETENTION (ARTICLE 22) [post_name] => right-of-arrested-persons-and-preventive-detention-article-22 [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 877 [term_id] => 242 ) [488] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1230 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-15 08:59:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES (ART 32, 33, 34 & 35) [post_name] => right-to-constitutional-remedies-art-32-33-34-35 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1230 [term_id] => 162 ) [489] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1230 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-15 08:59:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES (ART 32, 33, 34 & 35) [post_name] => right-to-constitutional-remedies-art-32-33-34-35 [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1230 [term_id] => 242 ) [490] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 638 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-05-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-13 05:07:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO EQUALITY (ARTICLE 14-18) [post_name] => right-to-equality [name] => Articles [object_id] => 638 [term_id] => 162 ) [491] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 638 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-05-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-13 05:07:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO EQUALITY (ARTICLE 14-18) [post_name] => right-to-equality [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 638 [term_id] => 242 ) [492] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 650 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-05-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-19 17:25:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO FREEDOM (ARTICLE 19) [post_name] => right-to-freedom-article-19 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 650 [term_id] => 162 ) [493] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 650 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-05-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-19 17:25:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO FREEDOM (ARTICLE 19) [post_name] => right-to-freedom-article-19 [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 650 [term_id] => 242 ) [494] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1217 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-11 09:41:37 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF RELIGION (ARTICLE 25-28) [post_name] => right-to-freedom-of-religion-article-25-28 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1217 [term_id] => 162 ) [495] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1217 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-11 09:41:37 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF RELIGION (ARTICLE 25-28) [post_name] => right-to-freedom-of-religion-article-25-28 [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1217 [term_id] => 242 ) [496] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 769 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-05-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-24 11:35:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO LIFE AND PERSONAL LIBERTY AND ITS EXPANDING HORIZONS (ARTICLE 21) [post_name] => right-to-life-and-liberty-and-its-expanding-horizons-article-21 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 769 [term_id] => 162 ) [497] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 769 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-05-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-24 11:35:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO LIFE AND PERSONAL LIBERTY AND ITS EXPANDING HORIZONS (ARTICLE 21) [post_name] => right-to-life-and-liberty-and-its-expanding-horizons-article-21 [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 769 [term_id] => 242 ) [498] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2420 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-20 17:01:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Roe Vs Wade (1973 ) : Right To Abortion Included Under Right To Privacy [post_name] => roe-vs-wade-1973-right-to-abortion-included-under-right-to-privacy [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2420 [term_id] => 243 ) [499] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10021 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-19 21:52:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ROJER MATHEW VS SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rojer-mathew-vs-south-indian-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10021 [term_id] => 35 ) [500] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10021 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-19 21:52:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ROJER MATHEW VS SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rojer-mathew-vs-south-indian-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10021 [term_id] => 245 ) [501] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10626 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-10-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-20 21:15:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ROMESH THAPPAR VS. THE STATE OF MADRAS (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => romesh-thappar-vs-the-state-of-madras-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10626 [term_id] => 35 ) [502] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10626 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-10-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-20 21:15:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ROMESH THAPPAR VS. THE STATE OF MADRAS (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => romesh-thappar-vs-the-state-of-madras-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10626 [term_id] => 245 ) [503] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1482 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-09-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-13 07:10:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RPS Infrastructure Vs. Mukul Kumar : The Supreme Court Observes That Once Resolution Plan Is Admitted Fresh Claims Can Not Be Admitted Under IBC [post_name] => rps-infrastructure-vs-mukul-kumar-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 1482 [term_id] => 35 ) [504] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1482 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-09-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-13 07:10:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RPS Infrastructure Vs. Mukul Kumar : The Supreme Court Observes That Once Resolution Plan Is Admitted Fresh Claims Can Not Be Admitted Under IBC [post_name] => rps-infrastructure-vs-mukul-kumar-case-summary [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1482 [term_id] => 162 ) [505] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10647 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-10 12:39:59 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RUDUL SAH VS STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rudul-sah-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10647 [term_id] => 35 ) [506] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10647 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-10 12:39:59 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RUDUL SAH VS STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rudul-sah-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10647 [term_id] => 245 ) [507] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9730 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-02-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-25 10:57:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RUPA ASHOK HURRA VS ASHOK HURRA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rupa-ashok-hurra-vs-ashok-hurra-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9730 [term_id] => 35 ) [508] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10634 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-07 17:14:58 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RUSTOM CAVASJEE COOPER VS UNION OF INDIA: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rustom-cavasjee-cooper-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10634 [term_id] => 35 ) [509] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10634 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-07 17:14:58 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RUSTOM CAVASJEE COOPER VS UNION OF INDIA: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rustom-cavasjee-cooper-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10634 [term_id] => 245 ) [510] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10661 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-12 23:51:16 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => S P MITTAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => s-p-mittal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10661 [term_id] => 35 ) [511] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10661 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-12 23:51:16 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => S P MITTAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => s-p-mittal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10661 [term_id] => 245 ) [512] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10628 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-10-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-21 11:12:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => S RANGARAJAN VS P JAGJIVAN RAM (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => s-rangarajan-vs-p-jagjivan-ram-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10628 [term_id] => 35 ) [513] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10628 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-10-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-21 11:12:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => S RANGARAJAN VS P JAGJIVAN RAM (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => s-rangarajan-vs-p-jagjivan-ram-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10628 [term_id] => 245 ) [514] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10031 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-22 13:43:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => S. R. BOMMAI VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => s-r-bommai-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10031 [term_id] => 35 ) [515] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10031 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-22 13:43:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => S. R. BOMMAI VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => s-r-bommai-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10031 [term_id] => 245 ) [516] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2344 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-12-01 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-01 10:12:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SAJJAN SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN : TREADING THE BEATEN PATH [post_name] => sajjan-singh-vs-state-of-rajasthan-treading-the-beaten-path [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2344 [term_id] => 35 ) [517] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2344 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2023-12-01 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-01 10:12:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SAJJAN SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN : TREADING THE BEATEN PATH [post_name] => sajjan-singh-vs-state-of-rajasthan-treading-the-beaten-path [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 2344 [term_id] => 245 ) [518] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2340 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-11-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-30 09:41:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SANKARI PRASAD DEO VS UNION OF INDIA : FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS NOT IMMUNE FROM AMENDMENT [post_name] => sankari-prasad-deo-vs-union-of-india-fundamental-rights-not-immune-from-amendment [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2340 [term_id] => 35 ) [519] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2340 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2023-11-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-30 09:41:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SANKARI PRASAD DEO VS UNION OF INDIA : FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS NOT IMMUNE FROM AMENDMENT [post_name] => sankari-prasad-deo-vs-union-of-india-fundamental-rights-not-immune-from-amendment [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 2340 [term_id] => 245 ) [520] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1156 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-04 09:51:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Sanket Kumar Aggarwal & Anr VS. APG Logistics Pvt. Ltd. ( Case Summary ) [post_name] => sanket-kumar-aggarwal-vs-apg-logistics-pvt-ltd [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1156 [term_id] => 162 ) [521] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1156 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-04 09:51:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Sanket Kumar Aggarwal & Anr VS. APG Logistics Pvt. Ltd. ( Case Summary ) [post_name] => sanket-kumar-aggarwal-vs-apg-logistics-pvt-ltd [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1156 [term_id] => 170 ) [522] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11151 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2025-03-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-12 13:00:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SARANGA ANILKUMAR AGGARWAL VS BHAVESH DHEERAJ LAL SHETH : MORATORIUM UNDER SECTION 96 IBC NOT APPLICABLE TO PENALTIES UNDER CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT [post_name] => saranga-anilkumar-aggarwal-vs-bhavesh-dheeraj-lal-sheth-case-summary [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 11151 [term_id] => 234 ) [523] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9826 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-31 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-31 20:44:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SBP AND CO VS PATEL ENGINEERING LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => sbp-and-co-vs-patel-engineering-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9826 [term_id] => 35 ) [524] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1277 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-07-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-03 07:54:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Schenk Vs. United States (Case Summary) [post_name] => schenk-vs-united-states [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 1277 [term_id] => 243 ) [525] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9851 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-04-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-06 11:53:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SCOPE OF BINDING NATURE OF LAW DECLARED BY SUPREME COURT UNDER ARTICLE 141 OF THE CONSTITUTION [post_name] => scope-of-binding-nature-of-declaration-of-supreme-court-under-article-141-of-the-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9851 [term_id] => 162 ) [526] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11156 [slug] => articles [date] => 2025-03-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-13 15:11:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SCOPE OF POWERS OF SUPEME COURT AND HIGH COURT TO APPOINT ARBITRATOR [post_name] => scope-of-powers-of-supeme-court-and-high-court-to-appoint-arbitrator [name] => Articles [object_id] => 11156 [term_id] => 162 ) [527] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9848 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-04-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-05 22:53:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SCOPE OF SPEACIAL LEAVE PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 136 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA [post_name] => scope-of-speacial-leave-petition-under-article-136-of-the-constitution-of-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9848 [term_id] => 162 ) [528] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11168 [slug] => articles [date] => 2025-03-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-15 16:06:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SCOPE OF THE FIVE PREROGATIVE WRITS (MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI, HABEUS CORPUS, PROHIBITION AND QUO WARRANTO) [post_name] => scope-of-the-five-prerogative-writs-mandamus-certiorari-habeus-corpus-prohibition-and-quo-warranto [name] => Articles [object_id] => 11168 [term_id] => 162 ) [529] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11066 [slug] => articles [date] => 2025-01-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-01-29 22:50:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SCOPE OF WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS [post_name] => scope-of-writ-of-habeus-corpus [name] => Articles [object_id] => 11066 [term_id] => 162 ) [530] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11066 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2025-01-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-01-29 22:50:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SCOPE OF WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS [post_name] => scope-of-writ-of-habeus-corpus [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 11066 [term_id] => 242 ) [531] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11162 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2025-03-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-14 11:37:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SECTION 145(2) OF NEGOTIATIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT, 1881 APPLICATION FORMAT [post_name] => section-1452-of-negotiatiable-instrument-act-1881-application-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 11162 [term_id] => 1 ) [532] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9915 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-21 17:14:46 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SELVI VS STATE OF KARNATKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => selvi-vs-state-of-karnatka-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9915 [term_id] => 35 ) [533] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9915 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-04-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-21 17:14:46 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SELVI VS STATE OF KARNATKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => selvi-vs-state-of-karnatka-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9915 [term_id] => 245 ) [534] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1474 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-09-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-09 08:14:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SERVICE UNDER THE UNION AND THE STATES [post_name] => services-under-the-union-and-the-states [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1474 [term_id] => 162 ) [535] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1474 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-09-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-09 08:14:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SERVICE UNDER THE UNION AND THE STATES [post_name] => services-under-the-union-and-the-states [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1474 [term_id] => 242 ) [536] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10317 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-06-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-28 21:32:59 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SESH NATH SINGH VS BAIDYABATI SHEORAPHULI CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => sesh-nath-singh-vs-baidyabati-sheoraphuli-co-operative-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10317 [term_id] => 35 ) [537] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10317 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-06-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-28 21:32:59 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SESH NATH SINGH VS BAIDYABATI SHEORAPHULI CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => sesh-nath-singh-vs-baidyabati-sheoraphuli-co-operative-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10317 [term_id] => 244 ) [538] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9960 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-05-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-06 21:04:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SEVEN LAMPS OF ADVOCACY [post_name] => seven-lamps-of-advocacy [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9960 [term_id] => 162 ) [539] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9960 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-05-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-06 21:04:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SEVEN LAMPS OF ADVOCACY [post_name] => seven-lamps-of-advocacy [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 9960 [term_id] => 246 ) [540] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10728 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 19:11:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHANTISTAR BUILDERS VS NARAYAN KHIMALAL TOTAME : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => shantistar-builders-vs-narayan-khimalal-totame-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10728 [term_id] => 35 ) [541] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10728 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 19:11:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHANTISTAR BUILDERS VS NARAYAN KHIMALAL TOTAME : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => shantistar-builders-vs-narayan-khimalal-totame-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10728 [term_id] => 245 ) [542] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10793 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-26 22:56:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHATRUGHAN CHAUHAN VS STATE OF UP : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => shatrughan-chauhan-vs-state-of-up-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10793 [term_id] => 35 ) [543] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10793 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-26 22:56:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHATRUGHAN CHAUHAN VS STATE OF UP : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => shatrughan-chauhan-vs-state-of-up-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10793 [term_id] => 245 ) [544] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10778 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-23 20:36:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHAYARA BANO VS UNION OF INDIA (TRIPLE TALAQ JUDGMENT) [post_name] => shayara-bano-vs-union-of-india-triple-talaq-judgment [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10778 [term_id] => 35 ) [545] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10778 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-23 20:36:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHAYARA BANO VS UNION OF INDIA (TRIPLE TALAQ JUDGMENT) [post_name] => shayara-bano-vs-union-of-india-triple-talaq-judgment [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10778 [term_id] => 245 ) [546] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10649 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-10 13:58:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHEELA BARSE VS STATE OF MAHARASTRA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => sheela-barse-vs-state-of-maharastra-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10649 [term_id] => 245 ) [547] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10897 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-12-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-30 20:40:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHIKSHAK SAHAKARI BANK LTD VS MR. JAGDISH KUMAR PARULKAR, LIQUIDATOR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => shikshak-sahakari-bank-ltd-vs-mr-jagdish-kumar-parulkar-liquidator-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10897 [term_id] => 244 ) [548] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11526 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-04-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-04-29 17:45:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHILPA SAILESH VS VARUN SREENIVASAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => shilpa-sailesh-vs-varun-sreenivasan-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11526 [term_id] => 35 ) [549] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10018 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-18 14:41:22 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHREYA SINGHAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => shreya-singhal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10018 [term_id] => 35 ) [550] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10018 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-18 14:41:22 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHREYA SINGHAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => shreya-singhal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10018 [term_id] => 245 ) [551] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9747 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-04 18:36:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Sita Soren Vs. Union of India : The Supreme Court holds that bribery is not protected by Parliamentary privileges [post_name] => sita-soren-vs-union-of-india [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9747 [term_id] => 35 ) [552] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9747 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-03-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-04 18:36:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Sita Soren Vs. Union of India : The Supreme Court holds that bribery is not protected by Parliamentary privileges [post_name] => sita-soren-vs-union-of-india [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9747 [term_id] => 245 ) [553] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9937 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-03 22:16:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION FORMAT [post_name] => special-leave-petition-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9937 [term_id] => 1 ) [554] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 528 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-03-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-03-29 07:39:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SREI MULTIPLE ASSET INVESTMENT TRUST VISION INDIA FUND VS DECCAN MARKETEERS ( CASE ANALYSIS ) [post_name] => srei-multiple-asset-investment-trust-judgment [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 528 [term_id] => 35 ) [555] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 528 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-03-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-03-29 07:39:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SREI MULTIPLE ASSET INVESTMENT TRUST VISION INDIA FUND VS DECCAN MARKETEERS ( CASE ANALYSIS ) [post_name] => srei-multiple-asset-investment-trust-judgment [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 528 [term_id] => 244 ) [556] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9815 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-28 21:29:50 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SSANGYONG ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CO LTD VS NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => ssangyong-engineering-and-construction-co-ltd-vs-national-highway-authority-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9815 [term_id] => 35 ) [557] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10642 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-09 12:33:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE BANK OF INDIA VS CONSORTIUM OF MURARI LAL JALAN AND MR. FLORIAN FRITSCH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-bank-of-india-vs-consortium-of-murari-lal-jalan-and-mr-florian-fritsch-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10642 [term_id] => 35 ) [558] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10642 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-11-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-09 12:33:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE BANK OF INDIA VS CONSORTIUM OF MURARI LAL JALAN AND MR. FLORIAN FRITSCH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-bank-of-india-vs-consortium-of-murari-lal-jalan-and-mr-florian-fritsch-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10642 [term_id] => 244 ) [559] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10439 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-08-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-12 23:27:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF MADRAS VS SRIMATHI CHAMPAKAM DORAIRAJAN [post_name] => state-of-madras-vs-srimathi-champakam-dorairajan [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10439 [term_id] => 35 ) [560] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10439 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-08-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-12 23:27:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF MADRAS VS SRIMATHI CHAMPAKAM DORAIRAJAN [post_name] => state-of-madras-vs-srimathi-champakam-dorairajan [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10439 [term_id] => 245 ) [561] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10765 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-20 13:54:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF PUNJAB VS DAVINDER SINGH : SUB-CLASSIFICATION WITHIN SCHEDULED CASTES PERMISSIBLE [post_name] => state-of-punjab-vs-davinder-singh-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10765 [term_id] => 35 ) [562] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10765 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-20 13:54:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF PUNJAB VS DAVINDER SINGH : SUB-CLASSIFICATION WITHIN SCHEDULED CASTES PERMISSIBLE [post_name] => state-of-punjab-vs-davinder-singh-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10765 [term_id] => 245 ) [563] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10614 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-28 21:16:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF PUNJAB VS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNOR OF PUNJAB : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-of-punjab-vs-principal-secretary-to-governor-of-punjab-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10614 [term_id] => 35 ) [564] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10614 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-28 21:16:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF PUNJAB VS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNOR OF PUNJAB : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-of-punjab-vs-principal-secretary-to-governor-of-punjab-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10614 [term_id] => 245 ) [565] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11535 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2025-05-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-04 15:28:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF TAMIL NADU VS GOVERNOR OF TAMIL NADU : A CRITICAL REFLECTION [post_name] => state-of-tamil-nadu-vs-governor-of-tamil-nadu-a-critical-reflection [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 11535 [term_id] => 234 ) [566] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10772 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-22 11:05:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF UTTARANCHAL VS BALWANT SINGH CHAUFAL : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-of-uttaranchal-vs-balwant-singh-chaufal-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10772 [term_id] => 35 ) [567] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10772 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-22 11:05:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF UTTARANCHAL VS BALWANT SINGH CHAUFAL : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-of-uttaranchal-vs-balwant-singh-chaufal-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10772 [term_id] => 245 ) [568] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9783 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-15 22:38:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS THE COMMITTEE FOR PROTECTION OF DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-of-west-bengal-vs-the-committee-for-protection-of-democratic-rights-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9783 [term_id] => 35 ) [569] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9783 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-03-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-15 22:38:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS THE COMMITTEE FOR PROTECTION OF DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-of-west-bengal-vs-the-committee-for-protection-of-democratic-rights-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9783 [term_id] => 245 ) [570] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10348 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-10 10:20:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE TAX OFFICER VS RAINBOW PAPERS LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-tax-officer-vs-rainbow-papers-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10348 [term_id] => 35 ) [571] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10348 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-10 10:20:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE TAX OFFICER VS RAINBOW PAPERS LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-tax-officer-vs-rainbow-papers-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10348 [term_id] => 244 ) [572] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10908 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-12-31 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-31 18:58:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE TAX OFFICER VS RICOH INDIA LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-tax-officer-vs-ricoh-india-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10908 [term_id] => 244 ) [573] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1266 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-07-01 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-01 08:34:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Student Of Fair Admission Vs. Harvard : Consideration Of Race In Admission To Colleges Are Unconstitutional [post_name] => student-of-fair-admission-vs-harvard-case-analysis [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 1266 [term_id] => 243 ) [574] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10768 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-20 23:27:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUBHASH DESAI VS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNOR OF MAHARASTRA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => subhash-desai-vs-principal-secretary-governor-of-maharastra-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10768 [term_id] => 35 ) [575] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10768 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-20 23:27:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUBHASH DESAI VS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNOR OF MAHARASTRA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => subhash-desai-vs-principal-secretary-governor-of-maharastra-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10768 [term_id] => 245 ) [576] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10651 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-10 18:58:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUBHASH KUMAR VS STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => subhash-kumar-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10651 [term_id] => 35 ) [577] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10651 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-10 18:58:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUBHASH KUMAR VS STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => subhash-kumar-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10651 [term_id] => 245 ) [578] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9965 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-08 11:25:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUBSTITUTED SERVICE APPLICATION FORMAT UNDER ORDER 5 RULE 20 CPC [post_name] => substituted-service-application-format-under-order-5-rule-20-cpc [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9965 [term_id] => 1 ) [579] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10705 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-13 22:56:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUCHITA SRIVASTAVA VS CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => suchita-srivastava-vs-chandigarh-administration-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10705 [term_id] => 35 ) [580] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10705 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-13 22:56:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUCHITA SRIVASTAVA VS CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => suchita-srivastava-vs-chandigarh-administration-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10705 [term_id] => 245 ) [581] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 740 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-05-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-21 17:59:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Suit For Recovery Format [post_name] => suit-for-recovery-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 740 [term_id] => 1 ) [582] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11531 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2025-05-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-04 12:47:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE FORMAT [post_name] => suit-for-specific-performance-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 11531 [term_id] => 1 ) [583] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11542 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-05-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-10 18:16:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUKHPAL SINGH KHAIRA VS THE STATE OF PUNJAB : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => sukhpal-singh-khaira-vs-the-state-of-punjab-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11542 [term_id] => 35 ) [584] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11073 [slug] => articles [date] => 2025-02-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-06 21:16:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => summary-of-amendments-of-indian-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 11073 [term_id] => 162 ) [585] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11073 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2025-02-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-06 21:16:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => summary-of-amendments-of-indian-constitution [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 11073 [term_id] => 242 ) [586] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 304 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-02-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-02-11 21:02:24 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUNDARESH BHATT, LIQUIDTOR OF ABG SHIPYARD VS. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => sundaresh-bhatt-liquidator-of-abg-shipyard-vs-central-board-of-indirect-taxes-and-customs [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 304 [term_id] => 35 ) [587] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 304 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-02-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-02-11 21:02:24 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUNDARESH BHATT, LIQUIDTOR OF ABG SHIPYARD VS. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => sundaresh-bhatt-liquidator-of-abg-shipyard-vs-central-board-of-indirect-taxes-and-customs [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 304 [term_id] => 244 ) [588] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10346 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-09 20:27:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUNIL KUMAR JAIN VS. SUNDARESH BHATT : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => sunil-kumar-jain-vs-sundaresh-bhatt-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10346 [term_id] => 35 ) [589] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10346 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-09 20:27:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUNIL KUMAR JAIN VS. SUNDARESH BHATT : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => sunil-kumar-jain-vs-sundaresh-bhatt-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10346 [term_id] => 244 ) [590] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10791 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-26 20:37:50 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUPREME COURT ADVOCATE-ON-RECORED ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA (FOURTH JUDGES CASE) [post_name] => supreme-court-advocate-on-recored-association-vs-union-of-india-fourth-judges-case [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10791 [term_id] => 35 ) [591] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10791 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-26 20:37:50 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUPREME COURT ADVOCATE-ON-RECORED ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA (FOURTH JUDGES CASE) [post_name] => supreme-court-advocate-on-recored-association-vs-union-of-india-fourth-judges-case [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10791 [term_id] => 245 ) [592] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10470 [slug] => book-review [date] => 2024-09-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-04 14:34:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS ON IBC : BOOK REVIEW [post_name] => supreme-court-judgments-on-ibc-book-review [name] => Book Review [object_id] => 10470 [term_id] => 232 ) [593] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10774 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-22 23:00:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUPRIYO @ SUPRIYA CHAKRABORTY VS UNION OF INDIA : RIGHT TO MARRY NOT A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT [post_name] => supriyo-supriya-chakraborty-vs-union-of-india-right-to-marry-not-a-fundamental-right [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10774 [term_id] => 35 ) [594] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10774 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-22 23:00:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUPRIYO @ SUPRIYA CHAKRABORTY VS UNION OF INDIA : RIGHT TO MARRY NOT A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT [post_name] => supriyo-supriya-chakraborty-vs-union-of-india-right-to-marry-not-a-fundamental-right [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10774 [term_id] => 245 ) [595] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10901 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-12-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-30 23:27:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SURAKSHA ASSET RECONSTRUCTION LTD VS VARSHA BAGRI, LIQUIDATOR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => suraksha-asset-reconstruction-ltd-vs-varsha-bagri-liquidator [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10901 [term_id] => 244 ) [596] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9553 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-01-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-27 18:07:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUSHILA AGGRAWAL VS STATE ( NCT OF DELHI ) : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => sushila-aggrawal-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9553 [term_id] => 35 ) [597] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1181 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-05 07:33:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Swiss Ribbons Pvt Ltd VS Union Of India (Case Summary) [post_name] => swiss-ribbons-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1181 [term_id] => 162 ) [598] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1181 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-05 07:33:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Swiss Ribbons Pvt Ltd VS Union Of India (Case Summary) [post_name] => swiss-ribbons-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1181 [term_id] => 170 ) [599] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10350 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-10 23:25:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. VS VISHAL GHISULAL JAIN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => tata-consultancy-services-ltd-vs-vishal-ghisulal-jain-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10350 [term_id] => 35 ) [600] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10350 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-10 23:25:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. VS VISHAL GHISULAL JAIN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => tata-consultancy-services-ltd-vs-vishal-ghisulal-jain-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10350 [term_id] => 244 ) [601] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9702 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-13 09:00:07 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TECHNIP SA VS SMS HOLDING (PVT.) LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => technip-sa-vs-sms-holding-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9702 [term_id] => 35 ) [602] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11549 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-05-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-23 20:07:24 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TEJ PRAKASH PATHAK VS RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => tej-prakash-pathak-vs-rajasthan-high-court-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11549 [term_id] => 35 ) [603] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10558 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-10 11:34:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TERRY VS OHIO : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => terry-vs-ohio-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10558 [term_id] => 243 ) [604] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2418 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-20 16:56:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Texas Vs Johnson : Burning Of Flag Protected Under First Amendment [post_name] => texas-vs-johnson-burning-of-flag-protected-under-first-amendment [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2418 [term_id] => 243 ) [605] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1257 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-26 10:14:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE COMPOSITION OF PARLIAMENT [post_name] => the-composition-of-indian-parliament [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1257 [term_id] => 162 ) [606] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1257 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-26 10:14:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE COMPOSITION OF PARLIAMENT [post_name] => the-composition-of-indian-parliament [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1257 [term_id] => 242 ) [607] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10443 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-08-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-13 20:27:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY VS RANGACHARI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => the-general-manager-southern-railway-vs-rangachari-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10443 [term_id] => 35 ) [608] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10443 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-08-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-13 20:27:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY VS RANGACHARI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => the-general-manager-southern-railway-vs-rangachari-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10443 [term_id] => 245 ) [609] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 541 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-04-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-15 16:46:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE JOURNEY OF THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY [post_name] => the-journey-of-constituent-assembly [name] => Articles [object_id] => 541 [term_id] => 162 ) [610] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 541 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-04-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-15 16:46:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE JOURNEY OF THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY [post_name] => the-journey-of-constituent-assembly [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 541 [term_id] => 242 ) [611] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10333 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-07 22:58:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE KARAD URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD VS SWWAPNIL BHINGARDEVAY : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => the-karad-urban-cooperative-bank-ltd-vs-swwapnil-bhingardevay-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10333 [term_id] => 35 ) [612] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10333 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-07 22:58:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE KARAD URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD VS SWWAPNIL BHINGARDEVAY : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => the-karad-urban-cooperative-bank-ltd-vs-swwapnil-bhingardevay-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10333 [term_id] => 244 ) [613] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9641 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-02-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-06 15:00:07 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE NEED FOR CLARITY ON JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION [post_name] => the-need-for-clarity-on-jurisdiction-of-the-supreme-court-under-article-32-of-the-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9641 [term_id] => 162 ) [614] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 531 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-04-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-07 06:59:07 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE ROAD TO THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => the-road-to-the-indian-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 531 [term_id] => 162 ) [615] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 531 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-04-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-07 06:59:07 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE ROAD TO THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => the-road-to-the-indian-constitution [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 531 [term_id] => 242 ) [616] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10602 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-24 23:20:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE STATE OF KERALA VS. K. AJITH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => the-state-of-kerala-vs-k-ajith-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10602 [term_id] => 35 ) [617] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10602 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-24 23:20:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE STATE OF KERALA VS. K. AJITH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => the-state-of-kerala-vs-k-ajith-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10602 [term_id] => 245 ) [618] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10763 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-19 23:30:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS ANWAR ALI SARKAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => the-state-of-west-bengal-vs-anwar-ali-sarkar-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10763 [term_id] => 35 ) [619] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10763 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-19 23:30:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS ANWAR ALI SARKAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => the-state-of-west-bengal-vs-anwar-ali-sarkar-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10763 [term_id] => 245 ) [620] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9719 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-02-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-16 05:03:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE SUPREME COURT JUNKS ELECTORAL BONDS [post_name] => the-supreme-court-junks-electoral-bonds [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9719 [term_id] => 35 ) [621] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2403 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 16:50:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Tinker Vs Des Moines : Rights Of Students Are Also Protected Under First Amendment [post_name] => tinker-vs-des-moines-rights-of-students-are-also-protected-under-first-amendment [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2403 [term_id] => 243 ) [622] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9831 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-02 23:32:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TMA PAI FOUNDATION VS STATE OF KARNATKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => tma-pai-foundation-vs-state-of-karnatka-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9831 [term_id] => 35 ) [623] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9831 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-04-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-02 23:32:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TMA PAI FOUNDATION VS STATE OF KARNATKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => tma-pai-foundation-vs-state-of-karnatka-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9831 [term_id] => 245 ) [624] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2222 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-10-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-24 08:27:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Tottempudi Salalith Vs State Bank Of India : Doctrine Of Election Will Not Apply In Case Of Insolvency Proceedings Initiated On The Basis Of Recovery Certificate [post_name] => tottempudi-salalith-vs-state-bank-of-india-supreme-court [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2222 [term_id] => 35 ) [625] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2222 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-10-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-24 08:27:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Tottempudi Salalith Vs State Bank Of India : Doctrine Of Election Will Not Apply In Case Of Insolvency Proceedings Initiated On The Basis Of Recovery Certificate [post_name] => tottempudi-salalith-vs-state-bank-of-india-supreme-court [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2222 [term_id] => 162 ) [626] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1446 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-08-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-26 12:45:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TRADE , COMMERCE AND INTERCOURSE WITHIN TERRITORY OF INDIA [post_name] => trade-commerce-and-intercourse-within-the-territory-of-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1446 [term_id] => 162 ) [627] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1446 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-08-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-26 12:45:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TRADE , COMMERCE AND INTERCOURSE WITHIN TERRITORY OF INDIA [post_name] => trade-commerce-and-intercourse-within-the-territory-of-india [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1446 [term_id] => 242 ) [628] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9942 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-04 20:18:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TRANSFER PETITION FORMAT IN MATRIMONIAL MATTERS _SUPREME COURT [post_name] => transfer-petition-format-in-matrimonial-matters-_supreme-court [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9942 [term_id] => 1 ) [629] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9947 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-04 22:22:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TRANSFER PETITION FORMAT UNDER SECTION 406 Cr.PC _SUPREME COURT [post_name] => transfer-petition-format-under-section-406-cr-pc-_supreme-court [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9947 [term_id] => 1 ) [630] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2330 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-11-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-24 15:29:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TREATMENT OF PF, GRATUITY AND PENSION DUES UNDER IBC – A GREY AREA REQUIRING CLARITY [post_name] => treatment-of-pf-gratuity-and-pension-dues-under-ibc-a-grey-area-requiring-clarity [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2330 [term_id] => 162 ) [631] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2330 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-11-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-24 15:29:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TREATMENT OF PF, GRATUITY AND PENSION DUES UNDER IBC – A GREY AREA REQUIRING CLARITY [post_name] => treatment-of-pf-gratuity-and-pension-dues-under-ibc-a-grey-area-requiring-clarity [name] => IBC [object_id] => 2330 [term_id] => 170 ) [632] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9710 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-13 18:10:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TREATMENT OF SECURED CREDITORS UNDER IBC [post_name] => treatment-of-secured-creditor-under-ibc [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9710 [term_id] => 162 ) [633] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9710 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-13 18:10:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TREATMENT OF SECURED CREDITORS UNDER IBC [post_name] => treatment-of-secured-creditor-under-ibc [name] => IBC [object_id] => 9710 [term_id] => 170 ) [634] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10858 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 18:25:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TREATMENT OF THE SECURED CREDITOR UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => treatment-of-the-secured-creditor-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10858 [term_id] => 170 ) [635] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1479 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-09-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-12 14:20:35 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TRIBUNALS AND THEIR INCREASING ROLE IN ADJUDICATION [post_name] => tribunals-and-their-increasing-role-in-adjudication [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1479 [term_id] => 162 ) [636] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1479 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-09-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-12 14:20:35 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TRIBUNALS AND THEIR INCREASING ROLE IN ADJUDICATION [post_name] => tribunals-and-their-increasing-role-in-adjudication [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1479 [term_id] => 242 ) [637] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1426 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-08-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-09 15:56:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNENDING BATTLE FOR CONTROL OF SERVICES BETWEEN DELHI GOVT AND CENTRE [post_name] => unending-battle-for-control-of-services-between-delhi-and-centre [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1426 [term_id] => 162 ) [638] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1426 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-08-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-09 15:56:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNENDING BATTLE FOR CONTROL OF SERVICES BETWEEN DELHI GOVT AND CENTRE [post_name] => unending-battle-for-control-of-services-between-delhi-and-centre [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1426 [term_id] => 242 ) [639] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2239 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-11-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-02 09:03:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNIFORM CIVIL CODE : WILL IT EVER SEE LIGHT OF THE DAY ? [post_name] => uniform-civil-code-will-it-ever-see-light-of-the-day [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2239 [term_id] => 162 ) [640] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2239 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-11-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-02 09:03:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNIFORM CIVIL CODE : WILL IT EVER SEE LIGHT OF THE DAY ? [post_name] => uniform-civil-code-will-it-ever-see-light-of-the-day [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2239 [term_id] => 242 ) [641] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 549 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-04-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-22 12:36:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNION AND ITS TERRITORY [post_name] => union-and-its-territory [name] => Articles [object_id] => 549 [term_id] => 162 ) [642] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 549 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-04-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-22 12:36:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNION AND ITS TERRITORY [post_name] => union-and-its-territory [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 549 [term_id] => 242 ) [643] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10797 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-29 11:42:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNION OF INDIA VS ASSOCIATION OF DEMOCRATIC REFORMS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => union-of-india-vs-association-of-democratic-reforms-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10797 [term_id] => 35 ) [644] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10797 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-29 11:42:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNION OF INDIA VS ASSOCIATION OF DEMOCRATIC REFORMS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => union-of-india-vs-association-of-democratic-reforms-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10797 [term_id] => 245 ) [645] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9977 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-11 21:48:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNION OF INDIA VS SRI HARAN @ MURUGAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => union-of-india-vs-sri-haran-murugan-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9977 [term_id] => 35 ) [646] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1424 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-08-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-08 14:55:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNION TERRITORIES AND THEIR ADMINISTRATION [post_name] => union-territories-and-thier-administration [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1424 [term_id] => 162 ) [647] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1424 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-08-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-08 14:55:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNION TERRITORIES AND THEIR ADMINISTRATION [post_name] => union-territories-and-thier-administration [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1424 [term_id] => 242 ) [648] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10578 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-14 23:31:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNITED STATES VS NIXON : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => united-states-vs-nixon-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10578 [term_id] => 243 ) [649] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10319 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-06-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-30 11:22:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => V NAGARAJAN VS SKS ISPAT AND POWER LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => v-nagarajan-vs-sks-ispat-and-power-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10319 [term_id] => 35 ) [650] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10319 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-06-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-30 11:22:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => V NAGARAJAN VS SKS ISPAT AND POWER LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => v-nagarajan-vs-sks-ispat-and-power-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10319 [term_id] => 244 ) [651] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10595 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-23 00:27:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => V. S. PALANIVEL VS. P. SRIRAM,CS, LIQUIDATOR : TIME LINE PRESCRIBED UNDER RULE 12 OF SCHEDULE I OF LIIQUIDATION PROCESS REGULATION IS MANDATORY [post_name] => v-s-palanivel-vs-p-sriramcs-liquidator [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10595 [term_id] => 35 ) [652] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10595 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-09-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-23 00:27:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => V. S. PALANIVEL VS. P. SRIRAM,CS, LIQUIDATOR : TIME LINE PRESCRIBED UNDER RULE 12 OF SCHEDULE I OF LIIQUIDATION PROCESS REGULATION IS MANDATORY [post_name] => v-s-palanivel-vs-p-sriramcs-liquidator [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10595 [term_id] => 244 ) [653] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10342 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-09 11:54:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VALLAL RCK VS M/S SIVA INDUSTRIES AND HOLDING LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => vallal-rck-vs-m-s-siva-industries-and-holding-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10342 [term_id] => 35 ) [654] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10342 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-09 11:54:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VALLAL RCK VS M/S SIVA INDUSTRIES AND HOLDING LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => vallal-rck-vs-m-s-siva-industries-and-holding-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10342 [term_id] => 244 ) [655] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9744 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-03 06:13:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VELLORE CITIZENS WELFARE FORUM VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => vellore-citizens-welfare-forum-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9744 [term_id] => 35 ) [656] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9744 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-03-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-03 06:13:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VELLORE CITIZENS WELFARE FORUM VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => vellore-citizens-welfare-forum-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9744 [term_id] => 245 ) [657] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 525 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-03-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-03-19 03:08:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VICTORY IRON WORKS LTD. VS JITENDRA LOHIA (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => victory-iron-works [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 525 [term_id] => 35 ) [658] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 525 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-03-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-03-19 03:08:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VICTORY IRON WORKS LTD. VS JITENDRA LOHIA (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => victory-iron-works [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 525 [term_id] => 244 ) [659] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10344 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-09 14:30:16 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VIDARBHA INDUSTRIES POWER LTD. VS. AXIS BANK LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => vidarbha-industries-power-ltd-vs-axis-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10344 [term_id] => 35 ) [660] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10344 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-09 14:30:16 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VIDARBHA INDUSTRIES POWER LTD. VS. AXIS BANK LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => vidarbha-industries-power-ltd-vs-axis-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10344 [term_id] => 244 ) [661] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10730 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 21:55:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VISHAKA VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => vishaka-vs-state-of-rajasthan-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10730 [term_id] => 35 ) [662] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10730 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 21:55:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VISHAKA VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => vishaka-vs-state-of-rajasthan-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10730 [term_id] => 245 ) [663] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1159 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-04 14:24:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd. & Ors VS. Mr. Dinkar Venkatasubramanian & Anr (Case Summary ) [post_name] => vistra-itcl-india-ltd-vs-mr-dinkar-venkatasubramanian [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1159 [term_id] => 162 ) [664] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1159 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-04 14:24:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd. & Ors VS. Mr. Dinkar Venkatasubramanian & Anr (Case Summary ) [post_name] => vistra-itcl-india-ltd-vs-mr-dinkar-venkatasubramanian [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1159 [term_id] => 170 ) [665] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10874 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 19:32:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => voluntary-liquidation-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10874 [term_id] => 170 ) [666] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10860 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 18:30:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WATERFALL DISTRIBUTION UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => waterfall-distribution-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10860 [term_id] => 170 ) [667] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2387 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 16:05:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => West Coast Hotel Vs Parris: State Can Fix Minimum Wage [post_name] => west-coast-hotel-vs-parris-state-can-fix-minimum-wage [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2387 [term_id] => 243 ) [668] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9811 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-03-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-27 14:01:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WHAT ARE CONTEMPT POWERS OF THE SUPREME COURT ? [post_name] => what-are-contempt-powers-of-the-supreme-court [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9811 [term_id] => 162 ) [669] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9811 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-03-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-27 14:01:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WHAT ARE CONTEMPT POWERS OF THE SUPREME COURT ? [post_name] => what-are-contempt-powers-of-the-supreme-court [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 9811 [term_id] => 246 ) [670] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9808 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-03-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-26 20:18:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WHAT ARE DUTIES OF AN ADVOCATE TOWARDS CLIENTS ? [post_name] => what-are-duties-of-an-advocate-towards-clients [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9808 [term_id] => 162 ) [671] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9808 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-03-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-26 20:18:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WHAT ARE DUTIES OF AN ADVOCATE TOWARDS CLIENTS ? [post_name] => what-are-duties-of-an-advocate-towards-clients [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 9808 [term_id] => 246 ) [672] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9501 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-01-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-26 16:06:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WHAT ARE TYPES OF CREDIT FACILITIES ? [post_name] => what-are-types-of-credit-facilities [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9501 [term_id] => 162 ) [673] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9835 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-04-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-04 11:47:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WHAT IS SCOPE OF JURISDICTION OF SUPREME COURT UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ? [post_name] => scope-of-jurisdiction-of-supreme-court-under-article-32 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9835 [term_id] => 162 ) [674] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9797 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-03-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-25 10:39:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WHEN AMICUS CURIAE IS APPOINTED BY COURT ? [post_name] => when-amicus-curiae-is-appointed-by-court [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9797 [term_id] => 162 ) [675] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9797 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-03-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-25 10:39:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WHEN AMICUS CURIAE IS APPOINTED BY COURT ? [post_name] => when-amicus-curiae-is-appointed-by-court [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 9797 [term_id] => 246 ) [676] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10564 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-11 20:01:16 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WISCONSIN VS YODER : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => wisconsin-vs-yoder-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10564 [term_id] => 243 ) [677] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2044 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2023-09-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-29 19:02:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Women's Reservation Bill, 2023 : Is It The End Of An Unending Story ? [post_name] => all-about-womens-reservation-bill-2023 [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 2044 [term_id] => 234 ) [678] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1444 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-08-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-24 07:02:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Written Statement Format [post_name] => written-statement-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 1444 [term_id] => 1 ) [679] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10576 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-14 22:31:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE CO. VS SAWYER : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => youngstown-sheet-tube-co-vs-sawyer-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10576 [term_id] => 243 ) )
►
Articles
►
Book Review
►
Everyday Law
▼
Featured Post
►
IBC
►
Indian Constitution
►
Judgments
►
Legal Formats
►
Professional Ethics
►
PWDVA
►
Supreme Court on Constitution
►
Supreme Court on IBC
►
USA Supreme Court