Author: Mukesh Kumar Suman

The Supreme Court in Suchita Srivastava Vs. Chandigarh Administration (2009) 13 SCR 989   held that a woman’s right to make reproductive choices is also a dimension of “personal liberty”  as understood under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court held in Kharak Singh Vs State of U.P. (1964) 1 SCR 332 that right to “move” denotes nothing more than a right of locomotion and that in the context the adverb “freely” would only connote that the freedom to move is without restriction and is absolute.

The Supreme Court in S. P. Mittal Vs. Union of India (1983)1SCR 729 held that Sri Aurobindo Society was not a religious denomination.

The Supreme Court in Rev. Stainislaus Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (1977)SCR (2) 611 held that  there is no Fundamental Right under Article 25 of the Constitution to covert a person to one’s own religion.

The Supreme Court in  Francis Coralie Mullin Vs. The Administrator, Union Territory (1981) 2 SCR 516 has held that right to live includes right to live with human dignity and all that goes along with it.