SHANTISTAR BUILDERS VS NARAYAN KHIMALAL TOTAME : CASE SUMMARY
The Supreme Court in Shantistar Builders Vs Narayan Khimalal Totame (1990)1SCC520 held that right to reasonable residence is included in right to life under Article 21.
Read MoreAdvocate | Legal Author
The Supreme Court in Shantistar Builders Vs Narayan Khimalal Totame (1990)1SCC520 held that right to reasonable residence is included in right to life under Article 21.
Read MoreThe Supreme Court in Mohd Ahmad Khan Vs Shah Bano (1985) 3 SCR 844 emphasized the need of enactment of Uniform Civil Code under Article 44 of the Constitution.
Read MoreThe Supreme Court held in Miss Mohini Jain Vs. State of Karnataka (1992) 3 SCR 658 that right to education flows directly from right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution. The right to life and the dignity of an individual cannot be assured unless it is accompanied by the right to education.
Read MoreThe Supreme Court in K C Gajapati Narayan Deo Vs. State of Orissa (1954) 1 SCR 1 held that the idea conveyed by “colorable legislation” is that although apparently a legislature in passing a statute purported to act within the limits of its powers, yet in substance and in reality, it transgressed these powers, the transgression being veiled by what appears on proper examination, to be a mere pretense or disguise.
Read MoreThe Supreme Court in AIIMS Students Union Vs AIIMS (2001) Supp 2 SCR 79 held that Fundamental Duties, though not enforceable by a writ of the court, yet provide a valuable guide and aid to interpretation of constitutional and legal issues.
Read More