Author: Mukesh Kumar Suman

The Supreme Court in Excel Wear Etc Vs Union of India (1979) 1 SCR 1009  held that the right to close business is an integral part of  Fundamental Right to carry on a business.

The Supreme Court in Suchita Srivastava Vs. Chandigarh Administration (2009) 13 SCR 989   held that a woman’s right to make reproductive choices is also a dimension of “personal liberty”  as understood under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court held in Kharak Singh Vs State of U.P. (1964) 1 SCR 332 that right to “move” denotes nothing more than a right of locomotion and that in the context the adverb “freely” would only connote that the freedom to move is without restriction and is absolute.

The Supreme Court in S. P. Mittal Vs. Union of India (1983)1SCR 729 held that Sri Aurobindo Society was not a religious denomination.

The Supreme Court in Rev. Stainislaus Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (1977)SCR (2) 611 held that  there is no Fundamental Right under Article 25 of the Constitution to covert a person to one’s own religion.