RUDUL SAH VS STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY
The Supreme Court held in Rudul Sah Vs State of Bihar 1983 AIR 1086 that compensation can be granted to aggrieved persons under Article 32 against violation of Fundamental Rights.
Read More
Mukesh Suman
Advocate | Legal Author
Author: Mukesh Kumar Suman
M. H. HOSKOT VS STATE OF MAHARASTRA : CASE SUMMARY
The Supreme Court in M. H. Hoskot Vs. State of Maharastra (1878)AIR 1548 held that indigent prisoners have to be provided free services of lawyers for filing appeal.
Read More
STATE BANK OF INDIA VS CONSORTIUM OF MURARI LAL JALAN AND MR. FLORIAN FRITSCH : CASE SUMMARY
The Supreme Court in State Bank of India Vs. Consortium of Mr. Murari Lal Jalan and Mr. Florian Fritsch (Civil Appeal No. 5023 – 5024/2024) held that one of the key objectives of the IBC is to ensure the survival of the Corporate Debtor as a going concern, yet the same must not come at the cost of efficiency. “Timely liquidation” should be preferred over an “endless resolution process”
Read More
PREM SHANKAR SHUKLA VS DELHI ADMINISTRATION : CASE SUMMARY
The Supreme Court in Prem Shankar Shukla Vs Delhi Administration (1980) AIR 1535 held that freedom from handcuff during transit between the prison house and court house will be the rule except the exceptional circumstances.
Read More
HUSSAINARA KHATOON VS HOME SECRETARY, STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY
The Supreme Court in Husaainara Khatoon Vs State of Bihar (1979) SCR 169 held that right to speedy trial is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Read More