Legal Formats – Page 2

Mukesh Suman

Advocate | Educator | Author

29 August 2024 Mukesh Kumar Suman

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COMPLAINT (PWDVA) FORMAT

BEFORE THE LD. METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, XXXX APPLICATION NO XX/XXXX IN THE MATTER OF: BASANTI …COMPLAINANT Versus VEERU & ORS

Legal Formats

29 August 2024 Mukesh Kumar Suman

CONSUMER COMPLAINT FORMAT

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION , XXXX CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. XX/XXXX IN THE MATTER OF: MUSSADI LAL …….COMPLAINANT

Legal Formats

8 May 2024 Mukesh Kumar Suman

APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE EX PARTE DECREE UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 13 CPC

(APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE EX PARTE DECREE UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 13 CPC ) IN THE COURT OF LD. CIVIL

Legal Formats

8 May 2024 Mukesh Kumar Suman

APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION FORMAT UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 9 CPC

(APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION FORMAT UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 9 CPC ) IN THE COURT OF LD. CIVIL JUDGE, CENTRAL DISTRICT,

Legal Formats

8 May 2024 Mukesh Kumar Suman

APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION AS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES FORMAT UNDER ORDER 22 RULE 3 CPC

(APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION AS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES FORMAT UNDER ORDER 22 RULE 3 CPC) IN THE COURT OF LD. CIVIL JUDGE,

collapsCat options: Array ( [title] => Categories [showPostCount] => 0 [inExclude] => exclude [inExcludeCats] => [showPosts] => 1 [showPages] => 0 [linkToCat] => 1 [olderThan] => 0 [excludeAll] => 0 [catSortOrder] => ASC [catSort] => catName [postSortOrder] => ASC [postSort] => postTitle [expand] => 0 [defaultExpand] => [debug] => 1 [postTitleLength] => 0 [catfeed] => none [taxonomy] => category [post_type] => post [postDateAppend] => after [postDateFormat] => m/d [showPostDate] => 1 [useCookies] => 1 [postsBeforeCats] => 1 [expandCatPost] => 1 [showEmptyCat] => 1 [showTopLevel] => 1 [useAjax] => 0 [customExpand] => [customCollapse] => [style] => kubrick [accordion] => 1 [title_link] => [addMisc] => 1 [addMiscTitle] => [number] => 5 [includeCatArray] => Array ( ) [expandSym] => ► [collapseSym] => ▼ ) postsToExclude: Array ( ) CATEGORY QUERY RESULTS Array ( [0] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 162 [name] => Articles [slug] => articles [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 162 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 108 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 232 [name] => Book Review [slug] => book-review [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 232 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 1 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 233 [name] => Everyday Law [slug] => everyday-law [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 233 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 4 [filter] => raw ) [3] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 234 [name] => Featured Post [slug] => featured-post [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 234 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 9 [filter] => raw ) [4] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 170 [name] => IBC [slug] => ibc [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 170 [taxonomy] => category [description] => IBC category comprises of Articles on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. [parent] => 0 [count] => 42 [filter] => raw ) [5] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 242 [name] => Indian Constitution [slug] => indian-constitution [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 242 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 60 [filter] => raw ) [6] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 35 [name] => Judgments [slug] => judgments [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 35 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 189 [filter] => raw ) [7] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 1 [name] => Legal Formats [slug] => legal-formats [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 1 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 32 [filter] => raw ) [8] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 246 [name] => Professional Ethics [slug] => professional-ethics [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 246 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 13 [filter] => raw ) [9] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 241 [name] => PWDVA [slug] => pwdva [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 241 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 10 [filter] => raw ) [10] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 245 [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 245 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 92 [filter] => raw ) [11] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 244 [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 244 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 82 [filter] => raw ) [12] => WP_Term Object ( [term_id] => 243 [name] => USA Supreme Court [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [term_group] => 0 [term_taxonomy_id] => 243 [taxonomy] => category [description] => [parent] => 0 [count] => 39 [filter] => raw ) ) POST QUERY: select ID, slug, date(post_date) as date, post_status, post_type, post_date, post_author, post_title, post_name, name, object_id, t.term_id from wp_term_relationships AS tr, wp_posts AS p, wp_terms AS t, wp_term_taxonomy AS tt WHERE tt.term_id = t.term_id AND object_id=ID AND post_status='publish' AND tr.term_taxonomy_id = tt.term_taxonomy_id AND tt.taxonomy IN ('category') AND post_type='post' ORDER BY p.post_title ASC POST QUERY RESULTS Array ( [0] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11090 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 11:21:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => "AGGRIEVED PERSON" UNDER PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => aggrieved-person-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11090 [term_id] => 241 ) [1] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9854 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-04-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-06 21:19:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => A CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF STATUTORY APPEALS FROM TRIBUNALS TO THE SUPREME COURT [post_name] => a-critical-appraisal-of-statutory-appeals-from-tribunals-to-the-supreme-court [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9854 [term_id] => 162 ) [2] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10882 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 19:57:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ADJUDICATORY FRAMEWORK UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => adjudicatory-framework-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10882 [term_id] => 170 ) [3] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1438 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-08-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-24 04:43:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ADMINISTRATIVE RELATIONS BETWEEN UNION AND STATES [post_name] => administrative-relations-between-union-and-states [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1438 [term_id] => 162 ) [4] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1438 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-08-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-24 04:43:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ADMINISTRATIVE RELATIONS BETWEEN UNION AND STATES [post_name] => administrative-relations-between-union-and-states [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1438 [term_id] => 242 ) [5] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11545 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2025-05-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-17 14:24:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ADVISORY JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT AND RECENT PRESIDENTIAL REFERENCE BY SMT. DROUPADI MURMU [post_name] => advisory-jurisdiction-of-the-supreme-court-and-recent-presidential-reference-by-smt-droupadi-murmu [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 11545 [term_id] => 234 ) [6] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10720 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-16 20:17:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => AIIMS STUDENTS UNION VS AIIMS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => aiims-students-union-vs-aiims-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10720 [term_id] => 35 ) [7] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10720 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-16 20:17:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => AIIMS STUDENTS UNION VS AIIMS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => aiims-students-union-vs-aiims-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10720 [term_id] => 245 ) [8] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10736 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2024-11-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-19 12:07:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY VS NARESH AGARWAL: SUPREME COURT FORMULATES INDICIA FOR DETERMINING MINORITY NATURE OF INSTITUTIONS [post_name] => aligarh-muslim-university-vs-naresh-agrawalcase-summary [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 10736 [term_id] => 234 ) [9] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10352 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-11 16:19:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ALOK KAUSHIK VS BHUVANESHWARI RAMANATHAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => alok-kaushik-vs-bhuvaneshwari-ramanathan-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10352 [term_id] => 35 ) [10] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10352 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-11 16:19:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ALOK KAUSHIK VS BHUVANESHWARI RAMANATHAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => alok-kaushik-vs-bhuvaneshwari-ramanathan-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10352 [term_id] => 244 ) [11] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10617 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-10-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-02 20:48:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => AN ANALYSIS OF BAIL JURISPRUDENCE IN INDIA [post_name] => an-analysis-of-bail-jurisprudence-in-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10617 [term_id] => 162 ) [12] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10795 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-27 11:11:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ANOOP BARANWAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => anoop-baranwal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10795 [term_id] => 35 ) [13] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10795 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-27 11:11:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ANOOP BARANWAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => anoop-baranwal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10795 [term_id] => 245 ) [14] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9618 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-02-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-04 18:02:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ANTICIPATORY BAIL FORMAT UNDER SECTION 438 IPC FORMAT [post_name] => anticipatory-bail-format-under-section-438-ipc-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9618 [term_id] => 1 ) [15] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10401 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-22 23:11:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ANUJ JAIN INTERIM RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL FOR JAYPEE INFRATECH VS AXIS BANK LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => anuj-jain-interim-resolution-professional-for-jaypee-infratech-vs-axis-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10401 [term_id] => 35 ) [16] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10401 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-22 23:11:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ANUJ JAIN INTERIM RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL FOR JAYPEE INFRATECH VS AXIS BANK LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => anuj-jain-interim-resolution-professional-for-jaypee-infratech-vs-axis-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10401 [term_id] => 244 ) [17] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9969 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-08 16:14:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION FORMAT UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 9 CPC [post_name] => application-for-restoration-format-under-order-9-rule-9-cpc [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9969 [term_id] => 1 ) [18] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9971 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-08 17:09:04 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE EX PARTE DECREE UNDER ORDER 9 RULE 13 CPC [post_name] => application-for-setting-aside-ex-parte-decree-under-order-9-rule-13-cpc [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9971 [term_id] => 1 ) [19] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9967 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-08 12:20:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION AS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES FORMAT UNDER ORDER 22 RULE 3 CPC [post_name] => application-for-substitution-as-legal-representatives-format-under-order-22-rule-3-cpc [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9967 [term_id] => 1 ) [20] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1322 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-13 15:19:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => APPOINTMENT AND REMOVAL OF JUDGE OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [post_name] => appointment-and-removal-of-a-judge-of-supreme-court-of-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1322 [term_id] => 162 ) [21] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1322 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-13 15:19:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => APPOINTMENT AND REMOVAL OF JUDGE OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [post_name] => appointment-and-removal-of-a-judge-of-supreme-court-of-india [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1322 [term_id] => 242 ) [22] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10418 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-26 21:25:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ARCELORMITTAL INDIA PVT LTD VS SATISH KUMAR GUPTA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => arcelormittal-india-pvt-ltd-vs-satish-kumar-gupta-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10418 [term_id] => 35 ) [23] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10418 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-26 21:25:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ARCELORMITTAL INDIA PVT LTD VS SATISH KUMAR GUPTA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => arcelormittal-india-pvt-ltd-vs-satish-kumar-gupta-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10418 [term_id] => 244 ) [24] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11554 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-05-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-28 20:39:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ARNESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => arnesh-kumar-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11554 [term_id] => 35 ) [25] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10364 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-15 13:16:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ARUN KUMAR JAGATRAMKA VS JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => arun-kumar-jagatramka-vs-jindal-steel-power-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10364 [term_id] => 35 ) [26] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10364 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-15 13:16:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ARUN KUMAR JAGATRAMKA VS JINDAL STEEL & POWER LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => arun-kumar-jagatramka-vs-jindal-steel-power-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10364 [term_id] => 244 ) [27] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10310 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-06-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-23 12:12:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ARVIND KEJRIWAL, BAIL AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE FRAMEWORK IN INDIA [post_name] => arvind-kejriwal-bail-and-criminal-justice-framework-in-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10310 [term_id] => 162 ) [28] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10377 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-17 21:52:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY (INDIA ) LTD. VS BISHAL JAISWAL & ANR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => asset-reconstruction-company-india-ltd-vs-bishal-jaiswal-anr-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10377 [term_id] => 35 ) [29] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10377 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-17 21:52:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY (INDIA ) LTD. VS BISHAL JAISWAL & ANR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => asset-reconstruction-company-india-ltd-vs-bishal-jaiswal-anr-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10377 [term_id] => 244 ) [30] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1315 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-12 11:06:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Attachment Before Judgment Under Order 38 Rule 5 CPC [post_name] => attachment-before-judgment-under-order-38-rule-5-cpc [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1315 [term_id] => 162 ) [31] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10866 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 19:01:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => AVOIDABLE TRANSACTIONS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => avoidable-transactions-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10866 [term_id] => 170 ) [32] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1489 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-09-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-15 16:10:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Axis Bank Vs. Naren Sheth : The Supreme Court Reiterates That Documents Acknowledging Debt Can Be Admitted At Appellate Stage Under IBC [post_name] => axis-bank-ltd-vs-naren-sheth-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 1489 [term_id] => 35 ) [33] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1489 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-09-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-15 16:10:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Axis Bank Vs. Naren Sheth : The Supreme Court Reiterates That Documents Acknowledging Debt Can Be Admitted At Appellate Stage Under IBC [post_name] => axis-bank-ltd-vs-naren-sheth-case-summary [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1489 [term_id] => 162 ) [34] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10315 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-06-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-28 15:23:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => B K EDUCATIONAL SERVICES VS PARAG GUPTA & ASSOCIATES : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => b-k-educational-services-vs-parag-gupta-associates-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10315 [term_id] => 35 ) [35] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10315 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-06-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-28 15:23:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => B K EDUCATIONAL SERVICES VS PARAG GUPTA & ASSOCIATES : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => b-k-educational-services-vs-parag-gupta-associates-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10315 [term_id] => 244 ) [36] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10610 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-28 12:13:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => B. P. SINGHAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => b-p-singhal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10610 [term_id] => 35 ) [37] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10610 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-28 12:13:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => B. P. SINGHAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => b-p-singhal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10610 [term_id] => 245 ) [38] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10393 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-20 19:59:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BABULAL VARDHARJI GURJAR VS. VEER GURJAR ALUMINIUM INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => babulal-vardharji-gurjar-vs-veer-gurjar-aluminium-industries-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10393 [term_id] => 35 ) [39] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10393 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-20 19:59:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BABULAL VARDHARJI GURJAR VS. VEER GURJAR ALUMINIUM INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => babulal-vardharji-gurjar-vs-veer-gurjar-aluminium-industries-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10393 [term_id] => 244 ) [40] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10360 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-14 12:28:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BANK OF BARODA & ANR VS MBL INFRASTRUCTURES LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => bank-of-baroda-anr-vs-mbl-infrastructures-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10360 [term_id] => 35 ) [41] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10360 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-14 12:28:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BANK OF BARODA & ANR VS MBL INFRASTRUCTURES LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => bank-of-baroda-anr-vs-mbl-infrastructures-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10360 [term_id] => 244 ) [42] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11141 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-02-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-28 15:26:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BANK OF BARODA VS FAROOQ ALI KHAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => bank-of-baroda-vs-farooq-ali-khan-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11141 [term_id] => 35 ) [43] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11141 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2025-02-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-28 15:26:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BANK OF BARODA VS FAROOQ ALI KHAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => bank-of-baroda-vs-farooq-ali-khan-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 11141 [term_id] => 244 ) [44] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2707 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-01-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-15 17:49:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Bharti Airtel Ltd Vs. Vijaykumar V. Iyer : The Supreme Court holds that Set off is not permissible during CIRP [post_name] => bharti-airtel-ltd-vs-vijaykumar-v-iyer-supreme-court [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2707 [term_id] => 35 ) [45] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2707 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-01-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-15 17:49:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Bharti Airtel Ltd Vs. Vijaykumar V. Iyer : The Supreme Court holds that Set off is not permissible during CIRP [post_name] => bharti-airtel-ltd-vs-vijaykumar-v-iyer-supreme-court [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 2707 [term_id] => 244 ) [46] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2062 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2023-10-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-06 07:14:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Bihar Caste Census : Is It An Agenda To Revive Caste Politics ? [post_name] => bihar-caste-census-is-it-an-agenda-to-revive-caste-politics [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 2062 [term_id] => 234 ) [47] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10655 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-11 10:08:22 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BIJOE EMMANUEL VS. STATE OF KERALA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => bijoe-emmanuel-vs-state-of-kerala-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10655 [term_id] => 35 ) [48] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10655 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-11 10:08:22 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BIJOE EMMANUEL VS. STATE OF KERALA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => bijoe-emmanuel-vs-state-of-kerala-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10655 [term_id] => 245 ) [49] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1434 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-08-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-14 17:47:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Bills To Replace Penal Code, Criminal Procedure And Evidence Act Introduced In Parliament [post_name] => bills-to-replace-penal-code-criminal-procedure-and-evidence-act [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1434 [term_id] => 162 ) [50] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1280 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-07-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-03 10:14:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Brandenburg Vs. Ohio (Case Summary) [post_name] => brandenburg-vs-ohio-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 1280 [term_id] => 243 ) [51] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1275 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-07-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-03 01:22:16 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Brown VS Board Of Education : Segregated Schools For White And Colored Race Are Unconstitutional [post_name] => brown-vs-board-of-education-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 1275 [term_id] => 243 ) [52] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10416 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-26 09:51:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BRS VENTURES INVESTMENT LTD. VS SREI INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => brs-ventures-investment-ltd-vs-srei-infrastructure-finance-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10416 [term_id] => 35 ) [53] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10416 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-26 09:51:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BRS VENTURES INVESTMENT LTD. VS SREI INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => brs-ventures-investment-ltd-vs-srei-infrastructure-finance-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10416 [term_id] => 244 ) [54] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10566 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-12 23:00:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BUCK VS BELL : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => buck-vs-bell-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10566 [term_id] => 243 ) [55] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10585 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-15 12:23:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => BUCKLEY VS VALEO : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => buckley-vs-valeo-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10585 [term_id] => 243 ) [56] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9804 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-03-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-26 12:02:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CAN AN ADVOCATE SOLICIT WORK OR ADVERTISE ? [post_name] => can-an-advocate-solicit-work-or-advertise [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9804 [term_id] => 162 ) [57] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9804 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-03-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-26 12:02:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CAN AN ADVOCATE SOLICIT WORK OR ADVERTISE ? [post_name] => can-an-advocate-solicit-work-or-advertise [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 9804 [term_id] => 246 ) [58] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10887 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-12-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-24 23:48:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CHINA DEVELOPMENT BANK VS. DOHA BANK Q.P.S.C. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => china-development-bank-vs-doha-bank-q-p-s-c-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10887 [term_id] => 244 ) [59] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10587 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-15 13:38:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CITIZENS UNITED VS FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => citizens-united-vs-federal-election-commission-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10587 [term_id] => 243 ) [60] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9760 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-03-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-12 17:25:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT, 2019 (CAA) COMES INTO FORCE [post_name] => citizenship-amendment-act-2019-caa-comes-in-force [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9760 [term_id] => 162 ) [61] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 560 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-04-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-27 09:36:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CITIZENSHIP OF INDIA [post_name] => citizenship-of-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 560 [term_id] => 162 ) [62] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 560 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-04-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-27 09:36:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CITIZENSHIP OF INDIA [post_name] => citizenship-of-india [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 560 [term_id] => 242 ) [63] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10535 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-07 17:46:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CIVIL RIGHTS CASES : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => civil-rights-cases-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10535 [term_id] => 243 ) [64] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1195 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-08 12:55:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Classification Of Creditors Under IBC [post_name] => classification-of-creditors-under-ibc [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1195 [term_id] => 162 ) [65] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1195 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-08 12:55:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Classification Of Creditors Under IBC [post_name] => classification-of-creditors-under-ibc [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1195 [term_id] => 170 ) [66] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10399 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-22 16:23:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS OF ESSAR STEEL INDIA LTD VS SATISH KUMAR GUPTA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => committee-of-creditors-of-essar-steel-india-ltd-vs-satish-kumar-gupta-case-summary-2 [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10399 [term_id] => 35 ) [67] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10399 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-22 16:23:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS OF ESSAR STEEL INDIA LTD VS SATISH KUMAR GUPTA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => committee-of-creditors-of-essar-steel-india-ltd-vs-satish-kumar-gupta-case-summary-2 [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10399 [term_id] => 244 ) [68] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10776 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-23 15:28:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COMMON CAUSE VS UNION OF INDIA (RIGHT TO DIE OF TERMINALLY ILL PERSONS ) [post_name] => common-cause-vs-union-of-india-right-to-die-of-terminally-ill-persons [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10776 [term_id] => 35 ) [69] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10776 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-23 15:28:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COMMON CAUSE VS UNION OF INDIA (RIGHT TO DIE OF TERMINALLY ILL PERSONS ) [post_name] => common-cause-vs-union-of-india-right-to-die-of-terminally-ill-persons [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10776 [term_id] => 245 ) [70] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9453 [slug] => everyday-law [date] => 2024-01-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-23 11:04:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Compensation In Motor Accident Cases [post_name] => compensation-in-motor-accident-cases [name] => Everyday Law [object_id] => 9453 [term_id] => 233 ) [71] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 747 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-05-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-21 18:09:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Complaint Before Magistrate Format [post_name] => complaint-before-magistrate-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 747 [term_id] => 1 ) [72] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 764 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-05-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-22 11:51:59 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Complaint Format Under Section 138 NI Act [post_name] => complaint-format-under-section-138-ni-act [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 764 [term_id] => 1 ) [73] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1397 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-26 06:51:35 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COMPOSITTION OF STATE LEGISLATURE [post_name] => compostion-of-state-legislature [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1397 [term_id] => 162 ) [74] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1397 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-26 06:51:35 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COMPOSITTION OF STATE LEGISLATURE [post_name] => compostion-of-state-legislature [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1397 [term_id] => 242 ) [75] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11159 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2025-03-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-14 10:28:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONDONATION OF DELAY APPLICATION FORMAT [post_name] => condonation-of-delay-application-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 11159 [term_id] => 1 ) [76] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10840 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 17:12:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONDUCT OF CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS (CIRP) UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => conduct-of-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-cirp-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10840 [term_id] => 170 ) [77] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10383 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-19 12:54:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTION CONSORTIUM LIMITED VS HITRO ENERGY SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => consolidated-construction-consortium-limited-vs-hitro-energy-solutions-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10383 [term_id] => 35 ) [78] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10383 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-19 12:54:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTION CONSORTIUM LIMITED VS HITRO ENERGY SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => consolidated-construction-consortium-limited-vs-hitro-energy-solutions-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10383 [term_id] => 244 ) [79] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11416 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2025-03-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-22 22:52:46 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONSTITUTION OF BENCHES IN SUPREME COURT [post_name] => constitution-of-benches-in-supreme-court [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 11416 [term_id] => 242 ) [80] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11081 [slug] => articles [date] => 2025-02-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-12 21:53:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONSTITUTIONALISM, TRANSFORMATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM AND CONSTITUTIONAL MORALITY [post_name] => constitutionalism-transformative-constitutionalism-and-constitutional-morality [name] => Articles [object_id] => 11081 [term_id] => 162 ) [81] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11081 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2025-02-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-12 21:53:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONSTITUTIONALISM, TRANSFORMATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM AND CONSTITUTIONAL MORALITY [post_name] => constitutionalism-transformative-constitutionalism-and-constitutional-morality [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 11081 [term_id] => 242 ) [82] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10450 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-08-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-29 09:55:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONSUMER COMPLAINT FORMAT [post_name] => consumer-complaint-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 10450 [term_id] => 1 ) [83] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9958 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-06 12:07:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CONTEMPT PETITION FORMAT UNDER ARTICLE 129 [post_name] => contempt-petition-format-under-article-129 [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9958 [term_id] => 1 ) [84] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1248 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-20 09:27:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COUNCIL OF MINISTERS AND THEIR COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY [post_name] => council-of-ministers-and-their-collective-responsibility [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1248 [term_id] => 162 ) [85] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1248 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-20 09:27:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COUNCIL OF MINISTERS AND THEIR COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY [post_name] => council-of-ministers-and-their-collective-responsibility [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1248 [term_id] => 242 ) [86] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11547 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-05-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-17 22:16:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => COX AND KINGS LTD VS SAP INDIA PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => cox-and-kings-ltd-vs-sap-india-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11547 [term_id] => 35 ) [87] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9973 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-05-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-09 22:29:16 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT : AN OVERVIEW [post_name] => criminal-appellate-jurisdiction-of-the-supreme-court-an-overview [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9973 [term_id] => 162 ) [88] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11166 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2025-03-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-14 13:11:16 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION FORMAT (HIGH COURT) [post_name] => criminal-revision-petition-format-high-court [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 11166 [term_id] => 1 ) [89] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1190 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-08 12:42:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Cross Border Insolvency Under IBC [post_name] => cross-border-insolvency-under-ibc [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1190 [term_id] => 162 ) [90] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1190 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-08 12:42:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Cross Border Insolvency Under IBC [post_name] => cross-border-insolvency-under-ibc [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1190 [term_id] => 170 ) [91] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1224 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-13 09:05:37 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS (ARTICLE 29-30) [post_name] => cultural-and-educational-rights-article-29-30 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1224 [term_id] => 162 ) [92] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1224 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-13 09:05:37 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS (ARTICLE 29-30) [post_name] => cultural-and-educational-rights-article-29-30 [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1224 [term_id] => 242 ) [93] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9956 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-06 09:46:35 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => CURATIVE PETITION FORMAT [post_name] => curative-petition-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9956 [term_id] => 1 ) [94] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1457 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-09-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-04 17:09:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Curious Case Of Sivanandan C T VS High Court Of Kerala [post_name] => curious-case-of-sivanandan-c-t-vs-high-court-of-kerala [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 1457 [term_id] => 35 ) [95] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10906 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-12-31 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-31 12:31:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => D. D. INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. VS RAJESH KUMAR AGARWAL, LIQUIDATOR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => d-d-international-pvt-ltd-vs-rajesh-kumar-agarwal-liquidator-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10906 [term_id] => 244 ) [96] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9753 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-06 08:39:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => D. K. BASU VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => d-k-basu-vs-state-of-west-bengal-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9753 [term_id] => 35 ) [97] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9753 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-03-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-06 08:39:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => D. K. BASU VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => d-k-basu-vs-state-of-west-bengal-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9753 [term_id] => 245 ) [98] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10717 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-16 11:43:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DAMYANTI NARANGA VS. UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => damyanti-naranga-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10717 [term_id] => 35 ) [99] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10717 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-16 11:43:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DAMYANTI NARANGA VS. UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => damyanti-naranga-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10717 [term_id] => 245 ) [100] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2562 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-01-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-06 07:33:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DBS Bank Ltd Singapore Vs Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd : The Supreme Court refers the matter related to treatment of dissenting secured creditors during CIRP to larger Bench [post_name] => dbs-bank-ltd-singapore-vs-ruchi-soya-industries-ltd [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2562 [term_id] => 35 ) [101] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2562 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-01-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-06 07:33:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DBS Bank Ltd Singapore Vs Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd : The Supreme Court refers the matter related to treatment of dissenting secured creditors during CIRP to larger Bench [post_name] => dbs-bank-ltd-singapore-vs-ruchi-soya-industries-ltd [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 2562 [term_id] => 244 ) [102] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9819 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-30 12:02:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DECCAN VALUE INVESTORS L P VS DINKAR VENKATASUBRAMANIAN : INFORMATION MEMORANDUM CAN NOT BE TESTED ON "TRUE PICTURE OF RISK" OBLIGATION [post_name] => deccan-value-investors-l-p-vs-dinkar-venkatasubramanian-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9819 [term_id] => 35 ) [103] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9819 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-03-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-30 12:02:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DECCAN VALUE INVESTORS L P VS DINKAR VENKATASUBRAMANIAN : INFORMATION MEMORANDUM CAN NOT BE TESTED ON "TRUE PICTURE OF RISK" OBLIGATION [post_name] => deccan-value-investors-l-p-vs-dinkar-venkatasubramanian-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 9819 [term_id] => 244 ) [104] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10069 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-05-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-26 13:00:37 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DEFENSES AVAILABLE IN CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS [post_name] => defenses-available-in-contempt-proceedings [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10069 [term_id] => 162 ) [105] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10069 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-05-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-26 13:00:37 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DEFENSES AVAILABLE IN CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS [post_name] => defenses-available-in-contempt-proceedings [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 10069 [term_id] => 246 ) [106] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11095 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 15:05:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DEFINITION OF "DOMESTIC INCIDENT REPORT" UNDER PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => definition-of-domestic-incident-report-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11095 [term_id] => 241 ) [107] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11097 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 15:12:59 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DEFINITION OF "DOMESTIC RELATIONSHIP" UNDER PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => definition-of-domestic-relationship-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11097 [term_id] => 241 ) [108] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11101 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 15:45:07 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DEFINITION OF "DOMESTIC VIOLENCE" UNDER PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => definition-of-domestic-violence-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11101 [term_id] => 241 ) [109] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11099 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 15:26:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DEFINITION OF "SHARED HOUSEHOLD" UNDER SECTION 2 (s) OF THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => definition-of-shared-household-under-section-2-s-of-the-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11099 [term_id] => 241 ) [110] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1262 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-28 13:52:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DELIMITATION OF LOK SABHA AND VIDHAN SABHA CONSTITUENCIES [post_name] => delimitation-of-lok-sabha-and-vidhan-sabha-constituencies [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1262 [term_id] => 162 ) [111] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1262 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-28 13:52:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DELIMITATION OF LOK SABHA AND VIDHAN SABHA CONSTITUENCIES [post_name] => delimitation-of-lok-sabha-and-vidhan-sabha-constituencies [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1262 [term_id] => 242 ) [112] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10385 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-19 18:16:07 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DENA BANK (NOW BANK OF BARODA) VS. C SHIVAKUMAR REDDY AND ANR. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dena-bank-now-bank-of-baroda-vs-c-shivakumar-reddy-and-anr-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10385 [term_id] => 35 ) [113] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10385 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-19 18:16:07 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DENA BANK (NOW BANK OF BARODA) VS. C SHIVAKUMAR REDDY AND ANR. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dena-bank-now-bank-of-baroda-vs-c-shivakumar-reddy-and-anr-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10385 [term_id] => 244 ) [114] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9981 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-12 22:20:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DHEERAJ MOR VS HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dheeraj-mor-vs-honble-high-court-of-delhi-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9981 [term_id] => 35 ) [115] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9981 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-12 22:20:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DHEERAJ MOR VS HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dheeraj-mor-vs-honble-high-court-of-delhi-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9981 [term_id] => 245 ) [116] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2336 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-11-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-26 07:42:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Dilip B Jiwrajka Vs. Union of India: Supreme Court upholds validity of Section 95 -100 of IBC [post_name] => dilip-b-jiwrajka-vs-union-of-india-supreme-court-upholds-validity-of-section-95-100-of-ibc [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2336 [term_id] => 35 ) [117] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2336 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-11-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-26 07:42:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Dilip B Jiwrajka Vs. Union of India: Supreme Court upholds validity of Section 95 -100 of IBC [post_name] => dilip-b-jiwrajka-vs-union-of-india-supreme-court-upholds-validity-of-section-95-100-of-ibc [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 2336 [term_id] => 244 ) [118] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1234 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-16 13:27:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY ? (Art 36 To 51) [post_name] => directive-principles-of-state-policy [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1234 [term_id] => 162 ) [119] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1234 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-16 13:27:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY ? (Art 36 To 51) [post_name] => directive-principles-of-state-policy [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1234 [term_id] => 242 ) [120] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10862 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 18:38:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DISSOLUTION OF CORPORATE DEBTOR UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => dissolution-of-corporate-debtor-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10862 [term_id] => 170 ) [121] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10574 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-14 21:30:03 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VS HELLER : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => district-of-columbia-vs-heller-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10574 [term_id] => 243 ) [122] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9559 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-01-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-30 05:10:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DIVORCE PETITION ON GROUND OF CRUELTY FORMAT [post_name] => divorce-petition-on-ground-of-cruelty-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9559 [term_id] => 1 ) [123] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2422 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-20 17:04:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Dobbs Vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization : Constitution Does Not Grant Right To Abortion [post_name] => dobbs-vs-jackson-womens-health-organ-constitution-does-not-grant-right-to-abortion [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2422 [term_id] => 243 ) [124] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2364 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-12-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-05 07:01:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DOCTRINE OF BASIC STRUCTURE : WHETHER PROGRESSIVE PRINCIPLE OR DILUTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ? [post_name] => doctrine-of-basic-structure-whether-progressive-principle-or-dilution-of-fundamental-rights [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2364 [term_id] => 162 ) [125] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2364 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-12-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-05 07:01:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DOCTRINE OF BASIC STRUCTURE : WHETHER PROGRESSIVE PRINCIPLE OR DILUTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ? [post_name] => doctrine-of-basic-structure-whether-progressive-principle-or-dilution-of-fundamental-rights [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2364 [term_id] => 242 ) [126] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9794 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-03-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-24 22:16:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DOES AN ADVOCATE HAVE RIGHT TO STRIKE ? [post_name] => does-an-advocate-have-right-to-strike [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9794 [term_id] => 162 ) [127] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9794 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-03-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-24 22:16:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DOES AN ADVOCATE HAVE RIGHT TO STRIKE ? [post_name] => does-an-advocate-have-right-to-strike [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 9794 [term_id] => 246 ) [128] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10452 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-08-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-29 11:14:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COMPLAINT (PWDVA) FORMAT [post_name] => domestic-violence-complaint-pwdva [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 10452 [term_id] => 1 ) [129] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9749 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-03-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-05 05:53:37 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Donald J. Trump Vs Norma Anderson : the USA Supreme Court sets aside debarment of Former President Trump from primary ballot [post_name] => donald-j-trump-vs-norma-anderson-usa-supreme-court [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 9749 [term_id] => 243 ) [130] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10606 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-26 13:08:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DR D. C. WADHWA VS. STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dr-d-c-wadhwa-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10606 [term_id] => 35 ) [131] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10606 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-26 13:08:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DR D. C. WADHWA VS. STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dr-d-c-wadhwa-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10606 [term_id] => 245 ) [132] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9781 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-14 09:16:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DR. ASHWANI KUMAR VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dr-ashwani-kumar-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9781 [term_id] => 35 ) [133] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9781 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-03-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-14 09:16:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DR. ASHWANI KUMAR VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dr-ashwani-kumar-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9781 [term_id] => 245 ) [134] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10623 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-10-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-20 13:51:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DR. PRADEEP JAIN VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dr-pradeep-jain-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10623 [term_id] => 35 ) [135] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10623 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-10-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-20 13:51:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DR. PRADEEP JAIN VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => dr-pradeep-jain-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10623 [term_id] => 245 ) [136] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2383 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 15:51:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Dred Scott Vs Sandford : A Negro Cannot Be Citizen Of USA [post_name] => dred-scott-vs-sandford-a-negro-cannot-be-citizen-of-usa [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2383 [term_id] => 243 ) [137] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10335 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-08 11:21:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DUNCANS INDUSTRIES LTD. VS. A. J. AGROCHEM : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => duncans-industries-ltd-vs-a-j-agrochem-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10335 [term_id] => 35 ) [138] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10335 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-08 11:21:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => DUNCANS INDUSTRIES LTD. VS. A. J. AGROCHEM : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => duncans-industries-ltd-vs-a-j-agrochem-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10335 [term_id] => 244 ) [139] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10715 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-16 10:08:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => E. R. ROYAPPA VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => e-r-royappa-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10715 [term_id] => 35 ) [140] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10715 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-16 10:08:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => E. R. ROYAPPA VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => e-r-royappa-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10715 [term_id] => 245 ) [141] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10391 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-20 17:22:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => E. S. KRISHNAMURTHY & ORS. VS. M/S BHARATH HI TECH BUILDERS PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => e-s-krishnamurthy-ors-vs-m-s-bharath-hi-tech-builders-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10391 [term_id] => 35 ) [142] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10391 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-20 17:22:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => E. S. KRISHNAMURTHY & ORS. VS. M/S BHARATH HI TECH BUILDERS PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => e-s-krishnamurthy-ors-vs-m-s-bharath-hi-tech-builders-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10391 [term_id] => 244 ) [143] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10445 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-08-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-14 13:49:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => E. V. CHINNAIAH VS STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => e-v-chinnaiah-vs-state-of-andhra-pradesh-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10445 [term_id] => 35 ) [144] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10445 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-08-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-14 13:49:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => E. V. CHINNAIAH VS STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => e-v-chinnaiah-vs-state-of-andhra-pradesh-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10445 [term_id] => 245 ) [145] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10403 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-23 23:36:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EBIX SINGAPORE PVT LTD VS COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS OF EDUCOMP SOLUTIONS LIMITED & ANR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => ebix-singapore-pvt-ltd-vs-committee-of-creditors-of-educomp-solutions-limited-anr-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10403 [term_id] => 35 ) [146] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10403 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-23 23:36:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EBIX SINGAPORE PVT LTD VS COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS OF EDUCOMP SOLUTIONS LIMITED & ANR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => ebix-singapore-pvt-ltd-vs-committee-of-creditors-of-educomp-solutions-limited-anr-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10403 [term_id] => 244 ) [147] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1492 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-09-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-16 18:07:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ELECTION COMMISSION AND ELECTORAL SYSTEM IN INDIA [post_name] => election-commission-and-electoral-system-in-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1492 [term_id] => 162 ) [148] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1492 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-09-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-16 18:07:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ELECTION COMMISSION AND ELECTORAL SYSTEM IN INDIA [post_name] => election-commission-and-electoral-system-in-india [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1492 [term_id] => 242 ) [149] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1251 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-23 07:49:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ELECTION OF MEMBERS OF RAJYA SABHA WITH CASE STUDY [post_name] => election-of-members-of-rajya-sabha-with-case-study [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1251 [term_id] => 162 ) [150] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1251 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-23 07:49:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ELECTION OF MEMBERS OF RAJYA SABHA WITH CASE STUDY [post_name] => election-of-members-of-rajya-sabha-with-case-study [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1251 [term_id] => 242 ) [151] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1242 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-18 09:32:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ELECTION OF PRESIDENT OF INDIA [post_name] => election-of-the-president-of-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1242 [term_id] => 162 ) [152] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1242 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-18 09:32:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ELECTION OF PRESIDENT OF INDIA [post_name] => election-of-the-president-of-india [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1242 [term_id] => 242 ) [153] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10356 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-12 11:12:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EMBASSY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS PVT. LTD. VS STATE OF KARNATAKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => embassy-property-developments-pvt-ltd-vs-state-of-karnataka-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10356 [term_id] => 35 ) [154] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10356 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-12 11:12:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EMBASSY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS PVT. LTD. VS STATE OF KARNATAKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => embassy-property-developments-pvt-ltd-vs-state-of-karnataka-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10356 [term_id] => 244 ) [155] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2040 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-09-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-26 14:12:59 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EMERGENCY PROVISIONS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION [post_name] => emergency-provisions-under-the-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2040 [term_id] => 162 ) [156] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2040 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-09-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-26 14:12:59 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EMERGENCY PROVISIONS UNDER THE CONSTITUTION [post_name] => emergency-provisions-under-the-constitution [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2040 [term_id] => 242 ) [157] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1485 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-09-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-13 15:46:35 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Eva Argo Feeds Vs. Punjab National Bank : The Supreme Court Observes That If The Liquidator Does Not Want To Accept Bid Of The Highest Bidder He Has To Apply His Mind To Relevant Factors [post_name] => eva-argo-feeds-pvt-ltd-vs-punjab-national-bank-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 1485 [term_id] => 35 ) [158] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1485 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-09-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-13 15:46:35 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Eva Argo Feeds Vs. Punjab National Bank : The Supreme Court Observes That If The Liquidator Does Not Want To Accept Bid Of The Highest Bidder He Has To Apply His Mind To Relevant Factors [post_name] => eva-argo-feeds-pvt-ltd-vs-punjab-national-bank-case-summary [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1485 [term_id] => 162 ) [159] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 743 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-05-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-21 18:03:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Evidence By Way Of Affidavit Format [post_name] => evidence-by-way-of-affidavit-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 743 [term_id] => 1 ) [160] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10824 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 15:39:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EVOLUTION OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => evolution-of-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10824 [term_id] => 170 ) [161] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10078 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-05-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-27 16:17:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EVOLUTION OF LEGAL PROFESSION IN INDIA [post_name] => evolution-of-legal-profession-in-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10078 [term_id] => 162 ) [162] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10078 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-05-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-27 16:17:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EVOLUTION OF LEGAL PROFESSION IN INDIA [post_name] => evolution-of-legal-profession-in-india [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 10078 [term_id] => 246 ) [163] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10306 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-06-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-17 14:21:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EVOLUTION OF RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN INDIA [post_name] => evolution-of-right-to-privacy-in-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10306 [term_id] => 162 ) [164] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10306 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2024-06-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-17 14:21:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EVOLUTION OF RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN INDIA [post_name] => evolution-of-right-to-privacy-in-india [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 10306 [term_id] => 242 ) [165] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11109 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 20:00:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EX PARTE ORDERS UNDER PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => ex-parte-orders-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11109 [term_id] => 241 ) [166] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 760 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-05-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-22 07:24:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EX POST FACTO LAWS, DOUBLE JEOPARDY AND PROHIBITION FROM SELF INCRIMINATION (ARTICLE 20) [post_name] => double-jeopardy-article-20 [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 760 [term_id] => 242 ) [167] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9714 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-02-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-14 13:06:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EXCEL CROP CARE LTD VS COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => excel-crop-care-ltd-vs-competition-commission-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9714 [term_id] => 35 ) [168] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10707 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-14 10:17:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EXCEL WEAR ETC VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => excel-wear-etc-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10707 [term_id] => 245 ) [169] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11537 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2025-05-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-06 18:54:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EXECUTION PETITION FORMAT [post_name] => execution-petition-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 11537 [term_id] => 1 ) [170] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10848 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 17:52:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EXTENSION, EXCLUSION & WITHDRAWAL OF CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS (CIRP) UNDER THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => extension-exclusion-withdrawal-of-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-cirp-under-the-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10848 [term_id] => 170 ) [171] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10826 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 15:55:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EXTENT AND APPLICABILITY OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => extent-and-applicability-of-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10826 [term_id] => 170 ) [172] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2042 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-09-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-28 08:05:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EXTENT OF POWER OF PARLIAMENT TO AMEND CONSTITUTION [post_name] => extent-of-power-of-the-parliament-to-amend-the-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2042 [term_id] => 162 ) [173] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2042 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-09-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-28 08:05:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => EXTENT OF POWER OF PARLIAMENT TO AMEND CONSTITUTION [post_name] => extent-of-power-of-the-parliament-to-amend-the-constitution [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2042 [term_id] => 242 ) [174] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10872 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 19:27:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FAST TRACK CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => fast-track-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10872 [term_id] => 170 ) [175] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 544 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-04-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-17 07:12:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FEATURES OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => features-of-indian-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 544 [term_id] => 162 ) [176] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 544 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-04-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-17 07:12:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FEATURES OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => features-of-indian-constitution [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 544 [term_id] => 242 ) [177] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10455 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2024-08-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-30 15:21:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FIR REGISTRATION AND INVESTIGATION UNDER BNSS [post_name] => fir-registration-and-investigation-under-bnss [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 10455 [term_id] => 234 ) [178] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11419 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2025-03-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-27 00:45:03 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FIRE AT JUDGE'S HOUSE & BURNING OF RULE OF LAW [post_name] => fire-at-judges-house-burning-of-rule-of-law [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 11419 [term_id] => 234 ) [179] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1461 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-09-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-05 16:00:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => First Motion Application For Divorce By Mutual Consent Format [post_name] => first-motion-application-for-divorce-by-mutual-consent-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 1461 [term_id] => 1 ) [180] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10657 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-12 12:50:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FRANCIS CORALIE MULLIN VS. THE ADMINISTRATOR, UNION TERRITORY OF DELHI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => francis-coralie-mullin-vs-the-administrator-union-territory-of-delhi-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10657 [term_id] => 35 ) [181] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10657 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-12 12:50:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FRANCIS CORALIE MULLIN VS. THE ADMINISTRATOR, UNION TERRITORY OF DELHI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => francis-coralie-mullin-vs-the-administrator-union-territory-of-delhi-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10657 [term_id] => 245 ) [182] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10868 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 19:14:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FRAUDULENT OR MALICIOUS CIRP INITIATION UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => fraudulent-or-malicious-cirp-initiation-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10868 [term_id] => 170 ) [183] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10838 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 17:00:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FUNCTIONS OF COMMITTEE OF CREDITORS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => functions-of-committee-of-creditors-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10838 [term_id] => 170 ) [184] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10852 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 18:04:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FUNCTIONS OF LIQUIDATOR UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => functions-of-liquidator-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10852 [term_id] => 170 ) [185] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11103 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 18:50:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FUNCTIONS OF PROTECTION OFFICER UNDER PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => functions-of-protection-officer-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11103 [term_id] => 241 ) [186] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 616 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-05-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-05 16:14:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND STATE [post_name] => fundamental-rights-and-state [name] => Articles [object_id] => 616 [term_id] => 162 ) [187] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 616 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-05-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-05 16:14:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND STATE [post_name] => fundamental-rights-and-state [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 616 [term_id] => 242 ) [188] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 371 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-02-13 17:14:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GHANASHYAM MISHRA VS. EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION LTD. (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => ghanshyam-mishra [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 371 [term_id] => 35 ) [189] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 371 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-02-13 17:14:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GHANASHYAM MISHRA VS. EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION LTD. (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => ghanshyam-mishra [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 371 [term_id] => 244 ) [190] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2381 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 15:44:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Gibbons Vs Ogden : Congress Can Regulate Inters state commerce [post_name] => gibbons-vs-ogden-congress-can-regulate-inters-state-commerce [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2381 [term_id] => 243 ) [191] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2393 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 16:23:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Gideon Vs. Wainwright : Poor Criminal Defendants Have To Provided Attorney Free Of Cost [post_name] => gideon-vs-wainwright-poor-criminal-defendants-have-to-provided-attorney-free-of-cost [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2393 [term_id] => 243 ) [192] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9738 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-01 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-01 10:12:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GITHA HARIHARAN VS RESERVE BANK OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => githa-hariharan-vs-reserve-bank-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9738 [term_id] => 35 ) [193] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9931 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-28 18:13:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GLOBAL CREDIT CAPITAL LTD VS SACH MARKETING PVT LTD : REAL NATURE OF TRANSACTION HAS TO BE ASCERTAINED TO DETERMINE WHETHER A CREDITOR IS OPERATIONAL OR FINANCIAL CREDTIOR [post_name] => global-credit-capital-ltd-vs-sach-marketing-pvt-ltd [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9931 [term_id] => 35 ) [194] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9931 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-04-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-28 18:13:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GLOBAL CREDIT CAPITAL LTD VS SACH MARKETING PVT LTD : REAL NATURE OF TRANSACTION HAS TO BE ASCERTAINED TO DETERMINE WHETHER A CREDITOR IS OPERATIONAL OR FINANCIAL CREDTIOR [post_name] => global-credit-capital-ltd-vs-sach-marketing-pvt-ltd [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 9931 [term_id] => 244 ) [195] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1111 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-02 11:16:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Glukrich Capital Pvt. Ltd. VS. The State Of West Bengal & Ors (Case Summary) [post_name] => glukrich-capital-pvt-ltd-vs-the-state-of-west-bengal [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1111 [term_id] => 162 ) [196] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1111 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-02 11:16:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Glukrich Capital Pvt. Ltd. VS. The State Of West Bengal & Ors (Case Summary) [post_name] => glukrich-capital-pvt-ltd-vs-the-state-of-west-bengal [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1111 [term_id] => 170 ) [197] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9727 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-02-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-21 15:45:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority Vs. Prabhjit Singh Soni : Supreme Court observes that NCLT has inherent power to recall an order [post_name] => greater-noida-industrial-development-authority-vs-prabhjit-singh-soni [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9727 [term_id] => 35 ) [198] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9727 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-02-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-21 15:45:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Greater NOIDA Industrial Development Authority Vs. Prabhjit Singh Soni : Supreme Court observes that NCLT has inherent power to recall an order [post_name] => greater-noida-industrial-development-authority-vs-prabhjit-singh-soni [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 9727 [term_id] => 244 ) [199] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10581 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-15 11:57:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GREGG VS GEORGIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => gregg-vs-georgia-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10581 [term_id] => 243 ) [200] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10542 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-08 13:19:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GRISWOLD VS CONNECTICUT : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => griswold-vs-connecticut-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10542 [term_id] => 243 ) [201] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1193 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-08 12:50:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Group Insolvency Under IBC [post_name] => group-insolvency-under-ibc [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1193 [term_id] => 162 ) [202] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1193 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-08 12:50:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Group Insolvency Under IBC [post_name] => group-insolvency-under-ibc [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1193 [term_id] => 170 ) [203] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10395 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-21 19:44:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LTD VS. AMIT GUPTA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => gujarat-urja-vikas-nigam-ltd-vs-amit-gupta-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10395 [term_id] => 35 ) [204] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10395 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-21 19:44:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => GUJARAT URJA VIKAS NIGAM LTD VS. AMIT GUPTA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => gujarat-urja-vikas-nigam-ltd-vs-amit-gupta-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10395 [term_id] => 244 ) [205] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9940 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-04 10:48:50 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HABEUS CORPUS WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 FORMAT [post_name] => habeus-corpus-writ-petition-under-article-32-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9940 [term_id] => 1 ) [206] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2413 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-12-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-20 16:39:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Haldiram Incorporation Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Amrit Hatcheries Pvt. Ltd. : The Supreme Court Holds That Handing Over Sale Certificate Completes Auction [post_name] => haldiram-incorporation-pvt-ltd-vs-amrit-hatcheries-pvt-ltd-the-supreme-court-holds-that-handing-over-sale-certificate-completes-auction [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2413 [term_id] => 35 ) [207] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2413 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-12-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-20 16:39:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Haldiram Incorporation Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Amrit Hatcheries Pvt. Ltd. : The Supreme Court Holds That Handing Over Sale Certificate Completes Auction [post_name] => haldiram-incorporation-pvt-ltd-vs-amrit-hatcheries-pvt-ltd-the-supreme-court-holds-that-handing-over-sale-certificate-completes-auction [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 2413 [term_id] => 244 ) [208] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2405 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-12-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-20 06:15:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Hari Bhai Thota : Supreme Court Observes That Exemption Under 240 A For MSME Applies At The Time Of Submission Of Resolution Plan [post_name] => hari-bhai-thota [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2405 [term_id] => 35 ) [209] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2405 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-12-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-20 06:15:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Hari Bhai Thota : Supreme Court Observes That Exemption Under 240 A For MSME Applies At The Time Of Submission Of Resolution Plan [post_name] => hari-bhai-thota [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 2405 [term_id] => 244 ) [210] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1422 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-08-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-07 17:02:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HIGH COURT : POWERS AND JURISDICTION [post_name] => high-court-powers-and-jurisdiction [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1422 [term_id] => 162 ) [211] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1422 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-08-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-07 17:02:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HIGH COURT : POWERS AND JURISDICTION [post_name] => high-court-powers-and-jurisdiction [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1422 [term_id] => 242 ) [212] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1414 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-27 13:06:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW BILLS ARE PASSED BY STATE LEGISLATURE ? [post_name] => passing-of-bils-by-state-legislature [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1414 [term_id] => 162 ) [213] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1414 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-27 13:06:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW BILLS ARE PASSED BY STATE LEGISLATURE ? [post_name] => passing-of-bils-by-state-legislature [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1414 [term_id] => 242 ) [214] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10631 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2024-11-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-07 10:12:17 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW PRESIDENT OF USA IS ELECTED ? [post_name] => how-president-of-usa-is-elected [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 10631 [term_id] => 234 ) [215] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2368 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-12-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-07 12:30:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW SARDAR VALLABH BHAI PATEL INTEGRATED 562 PRINCELY STATES ? [post_name] => how-sardar-vallabh-bhai-patel-integrated-562-princely-states [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2368 [term_id] => 162 ) [216] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2368 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-12-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-07 12:30:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW SARDAR VALLABH BHAI PATEL INTEGRATED 562 PRINCELY STATES ? [post_name] => how-sardar-vallabh-bhai-patel-integrated-562-princely-states [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2368 [term_id] => 242 ) [217] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9788 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-03-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-22 12:39:22 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW TO FILE CHEQUE BOUNCING COMPLAINT ? [post_name] => how-to-file-cheque-bouncing-complaint [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9788 [term_id] => 162 ) [218] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10894 [slug] => everyday-law [date] => 2024-12-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-27 13:12:21 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW TO GET DIVORCE BY MUTUAL CONSENT UNDER HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 ? [post_name] => how-to-get-divorce-by-mutual-consent-under-hindu-marriage-act-1955 [name] => Everyday Law [object_id] => 10894 [term_id] => 233 ) [219] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10889 [slug] => everyday-law [date] => 2024-12-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-25 16:38:35 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW TO GET DIVORCE UNDER HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955 ? [post_name] => how-to-get-divorce-under-hindu-marriage-act-1955-2 [name] => Everyday Law [object_id] => 10889 [term_id] => 233 ) [220] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11170 [slug] => everyday-law [date] => 2025-03-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-15 21:12:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HOW TO GET FIR REGISTERED ? [post_name] => how-to-get-fir-registered [name] => Everyday Law [object_id] => 11170 [term_id] => 233 ) [221] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10636 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-07 22:01:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HUSSAINARA KHATOON VS HOME SECRETARY, STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => hussainara-khatoon-vs-home-secretary-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10636 [term_id] => 35 ) [222] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10636 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-07 22:01:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => HUSSAINARA KHATOON VS HOME SECRETARY, STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => hussainara-khatoon-vs-home-secretary-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10636 [term_id] => 245 ) [223] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9866 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-13 16:06:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => I R COELHO VS STATE OF TAMIL NADU : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => i-r-coelho-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9866 [term_id] => 35 ) [224] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9866 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-04-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-13 16:06:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => I R COELHO VS STATE OF TAMIL NADU : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => i-r-coelho-vs-state-of-tamil-nadu-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9866 [term_id] => 245 ) [225] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10734 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-18 20:31:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => I. C. GOLAK NATH VS STATE OF PUNJAB : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => i-c-golak-nath-vs-state-of-punjab-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10734 [term_id] => 35 ) [226] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10734 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-18 20:31:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => I. C. GOLAK NATH VS STATE OF PUNJAB : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => i-c-golak-nath-vs-state-of-punjab-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10734 [term_id] => 245 ) [227] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2084 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-10-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-15 15:32:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IBBI Amends CIRP Regulations Regarding Timeline Of Filing Claims, Co-operation By Corporate Debtor Etc. [post_name] => ibbi-amends-cirp-regulations-in-respect-of-timeline-of-filing-claims-co-operation-by-corporate-debtor-etc [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2084 [term_id] => 162 ) [228] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1228 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-14 10:36:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IMPACT OF WELFARE STATE ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS [post_name] => fundamental-rights-and-welfare-state [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1228 [term_id] => 162 ) [229] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1228 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-14 10:36:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IMPACT OF WELFARE STATE ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS [post_name] => fundamental-rights-and-welfare-state [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1228 [term_id] => 242 ) [230] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9963 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-08 10:42:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IMPLEADEMENT APPLICATION FORMAT UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10 CPC [post_name] => impleadement-application-format-under-order-1-rule-10-cpc [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9963 [term_id] => 1 ) [231] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10604 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-25 12:00:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE : KESHAV SINGH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => in-re-keshav-singh-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10604 [term_id] => 35 ) [232] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10604 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-25 12:00:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE : KESHAV SINGH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => in-re-keshav-singh-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10604 [term_id] => 245 ) [233] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10653 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-10 21:03:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE : NOISE POLLUTION - IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LAWS FOR RESTRUCTURING USE OF LOUDSPEAKERS AND HIGH VOLUME PRODUCING SOUND SYSTEMS (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => in-re-noise-pollution-implementation-of-the-laws-for-restructuring-use-of-loudspeakers-and-high-volume-producing-sound-systems-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10653 [term_id] => 35 ) [234] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10653 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-10 21:03:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE : NOISE POLLUTION - IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LAWS FOR RESTRUCTURING USE OF LOUDSPEAKERS AND HIGH VOLUME PRODUCING SOUND SYSTEMS (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => in-re-noise-pollution-implementation-of-the-laws-for-restructuring-use-of-loudspeakers-and-high-volume-producing-sound-systems-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10653 [term_id] => 245 ) [235] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10621 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-10-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-20 00:13:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE : THE BERUBARI UNION AND EXCHANGE OF ENCLAVES (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => in-re-the-berubari-union-and-exchange-of-enclaves-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10621 [term_id] => 35 ) [236] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10621 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-10-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-20 00:13:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE : THE BERUBARI UNION AND EXCHANGE OF ENCLAVES (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => in-re-the-berubari-union-and-exchange-of-enclaves-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10621 [term_id] => 245 ) [237] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10770 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-21 22:00:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE: ARTICLE 370 OF THE CONSTITUTION (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => in-re-article-370-of-the-constitution-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10770 [term_id] => 35 ) [238] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10770 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-21 22:00:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE: ARTICLE 370 OF THE CONSTITUTION (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => in-re-article-370-of-the-constitution-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10770 [term_id] => 245 ) [239] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11540 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-05-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-06 20:37:36 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => IN RE: INTERPLAY BETWEEN ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS UNDER THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 AND THE INDIAN STAMP ACT 1899 : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => in-re-interplay-between-arbitration-agreements-under-the-arbitration-and-conciliation-act-1996-and-the-indian-stamp-act-1899-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11540 [term_id] => 35 ) [240] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11068 [slug] => articles [date] => 2025-02-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-03 19:43:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDEPENDENT SUGAR CORPORATION LTD. VS GIRISH SRIRAM JUNEJA & ORS: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => independent-sugar-corporation-ltd-vs-girish-sriram-juneja-ors-case-summary [name] => Articles [object_id] => 11068 [term_id] => 162 ) [241] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11068 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2025-02-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-03 19:43:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDEPENDENT SUGAR CORPORATION LTD. VS GIRISH SRIRAM JUNEJA & ORS: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => independent-sugar-corporation-ltd-vs-girish-sriram-juneja-ors-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 11068 [term_id] => 244 ) [242] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10340 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-08 23:05:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDIA RESURGENCE ARC PVT. LTD. VS M/S AMIT METALIKS LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => india-resurgence-arc-pvt-ltd-vs-m-s-amit-metaliks-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10340 [term_id] => 35 ) [243] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10340 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-08 23:05:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDIA RESURGENCE ARC PVT. LTD. VS M/S AMIT METALIKS LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => india-resurgence-arc-pvt-ltd-vs-m-s-amit-metaliks-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10340 [term_id] => 244 ) [244] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11083 [slug] => articles [date] => 2025-02-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-12 22:02:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDIAN CONSITUTION VIS-À-VIS WORLD CONSTITUTIONS [post_name] => indian-consitution-vis-a-vis-world-constitutions [name] => Articles [object_id] => 11083 [term_id] => 162 ) [245] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11083 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2025-02-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-12 22:02:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDIAN CONSITUTION VIS-À-VIS WORLD CONSTITUTIONS [post_name] => indian-consitution-vis-a-vis-world-constitutions [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 11083 [term_id] => 242 ) [246] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2236 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-11-01 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-01 16:24:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDIAN FEDERALISM AND ITS CHALLENGES [post_name] => indian-federalism-and-its-challenges [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2236 [term_id] => 162 ) [247] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2236 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-11-01 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-01 16:24:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDIAN FEDERALISM AND ITS CHALLENGES [post_name] => indian-federalism-and-its-challenges [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2236 [term_id] => 242 ) [248] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10780 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-24 00:32:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION VS THE STATE OF KERALA (SABARIMALA JUDGMENT) [post_name] => indian-young-lawyers-association-vs-the-state-of-kerala-sabarimala-judgment [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10780 [term_id] => 35 ) [249] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10780 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-24 00:32:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION VS THE STATE OF KERALA (SABARIMALA JUDGMENT) [post_name] => indian-young-lawyers-association-vs-the-state-of-kerala-sabarimala-judgment [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10780 [term_id] => 245 ) [250] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9859 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-08 23:25:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDRA SAWHNEY VS UNION OF INDIA : SUPREME COURT STAMPS CASTE BASED RESERVATION [post_name] => indra-sawney-vs-union-of-india-supreme-court-stamps-caste-based-reservation [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9859 [term_id] => 35 ) [251] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9859 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-04-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-08 23:25:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDRA SAWHNEY VS UNION OF INDIA : SUPREME COURT STAMPS CASTE BASED RESERVATION [post_name] => indra-sawney-vs-union-of-india-supreme-court-stamps-caste-based-reservation [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9859 [term_id] => 245 ) [252] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10337 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-08 16:02:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDUS BIOTECH PVT. LTD. VS. KOTAK INDIA VENTURE (OFFSHORE FUND) : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => indus-biotech-pvt-ltd-vs-kotak-india-venture-offshore-fund-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10337 [term_id] => 35 ) [253] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10337 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-08 16:02:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INDUS BIOTECH PVT. LTD. VS. KOTAK INDIA VENTURE (OFFSHORE FUND) : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => indus-biotech-pvt-ltd-vs-kotak-india-venture-offshore-fund-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10337 [term_id] => 244 ) [254] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10842 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 17:28:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INELIGIBILITY OF RESOLUTION APPLICANTS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => ineligibility-of-resolution-applicants-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10842 [term_id] => 170 ) [255] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10832 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 16:24:22 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INITIATION OF CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS (CIRP) UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => initiation-of-corporate-insolvency-resolution-process-cirp-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10832 [term_id] => 170 ) [256] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10366 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-16 15:35:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INNOVENTIVE INDUSTRIES VS ICICI BANK & ANR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => innoventive-industries-vs-icici-bank-anr-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10366 [term_id] => 35 ) [257] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10366 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-16 15:35:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INNOVENTIVE INDUSTRIES VS ICICI BANK & ANR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => innoventive-industries-vs-icici-bank-anr-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10366 [term_id] => 244 ) [258] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9926 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-28 13:45:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA VS SATYANARAYAN BANKATLAL MALU : SESSIONS JUDGE OR ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE HAS JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN COMPLAINT UNDER IBC [post_name] => insolvency-and-bankruptcy-board-of-india-vs-satyanarayan-bankatlal-malu-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9926 [term_id] => 35 ) [259] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9926 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-04-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-28 13:45:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY BOARD OF INDIA VS SATYANARAYAN BANKATLAL MALU : SESSIONS JUDGE OR ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE HAS JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN COMPLAINT UNDER IBC [post_name] => insolvency-and-bankruptcy-board-of-india-vs-satyanarayan-bankatlal-malu-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 9926 [term_id] => 244 ) [260] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10880 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 19:50:24 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INSOLVENCY OF PERSONAL GUARANTORS OF CORPORATE DEBTOR UNDER IBC [post_name] => insolvency-of-personal-guarantors-of-corporate-debtor-under-ibc [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10880 [term_id] => 170 ) [261] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10876 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 19:37:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION OF FINANCIAL SERVICE PROVIDERS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => insolvency-resolution-of-financial-service-providers-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10876 [term_id] => 170 ) [262] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10782 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-24 14:10:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JANHIT ABHIYAN VS UNION OF INDIA : ONE HUNDRED AND THIRD AMENDMENT PROVIDING TEN PERCENT RESERVATION TO EWS CONSTITUTIONALLY VALID [post_name] => janhit-abhiyan-vs-union-of-india [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10782 [term_id] => 35 ) [263] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10782 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-24 14:10:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JANHIT ABHIYAN VS UNION OF INDIA : ONE HUNDRED AND THIRD AMENDMENT PROVIDING TEN PERCENT RESERVATION TO EWS CONSTITUTIONALLY VALID [post_name] => janhit-abhiyan-vs-union-of-india [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10782 [term_id] => 245 ) [264] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9862 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-04-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-09 22:29:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JARNAIL SINGH VS LACHHMI NARAIN GUPTA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jarnail-singh-vs-lachhmi-narain-gupta-case-summary [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9862 [term_id] => 162 ) [265] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9862 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-04-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-09 22:29:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JARNAIL SINGH VS LACHHMI NARAIN GUPTA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jarnail-singh-vs-lachhmi-narain-gupta-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9862 [term_id] => 245 ) [266] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10592 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-22 17:41:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JAYA BACHCHAN VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jaya-bachchan-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10592 [term_id] => 35 ) [267] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10592 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-22 17:41:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JAYA BACHCHAN VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jaya-bachchan-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10592 [term_id] => 245 ) [268] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10412 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-25 19:57:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JAYPEE KENSINGTON BOULEVARD APARTMENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION VS NBCC (INDIA ) LTD & ORS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jaypee-kensington-boulevard-apartments-welfare-association-vs-nbcc-india-ltd-ors-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10412 [term_id] => 35 ) [269] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10412 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-25 19:57:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JAYPEE KENSINGTON BOULEVARD APARTMENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION VS NBCC (INDIA ) LTD & ORS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jaypee-kensington-boulevard-apartments-welfare-association-vs-nbcc-india-ltd-ors-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10412 [term_id] => 244 ) [270] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10379 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-17 23:32:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JIGNESH SHAH VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jignesh-shah-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10379 [term_id] => 35 ) [271] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10379 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-17 23:32:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JIGNESH SHAH VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jignesh-shah-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10379 [term_id] => 244 ) [272] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10786 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-25 13:47:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JINDAL STAINLESS LTD VS. STATE OF HARYANA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jindal-stainless-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10786 [term_id] => 35 ) [273] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10786 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-25 13:47:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JINDAL STAINLESS LTD VS. STATE OF HARYANA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => jindal-stainless-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10786 [term_id] => 245 ) [274] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9918 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-23 12:14:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JOSEPH SHINE VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => joseph-shine-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9918 [term_id] => 35 ) [275] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9918 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-04-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-23 12:14:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JOSEPH SHINE VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => joseph-shine-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9918 [term_id] => 245 ) [276] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2233 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-10-31 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-31 15:15:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN INDIA : WHETHER CONSTITUTIONAL NECESSITY OR ENCROACHMENT ON EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE DOMAIN [post_name] => judicial-activism-in-india-whether-constitutional-necessity-or-encroachment-on-executive-and-legislative-domain [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2233 [term_id] => 162 ) [277] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2233 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-10-31 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-31 15:15:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN INDIA : WHETHER CONSTITUTIONAL NECESSITY OR ENCROACHMENT ON EXECUTIVE AND LEGISLATIVE DOMAIN [post_name] => judicial-activism-in-india-whether-constitutional-necessity-or-encroachment-on-executive-and-legislative-domain [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2233 [term_id] => 242 ) [278] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1325 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-16 08:59:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JURISDICTION OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [post_name] => jurisdiction-of-the-surpreme-court [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1325 [term_id] => 162 ) [279] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1325 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-16 08:59:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JURISDICTION OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [post_name] => jurisdiction-of-the-surpreme-court [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1325 [term_id] => 242 ) [280] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10067 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-23 21:24:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JUSTICE K. S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD.) VS UNION OF INDIA ( AADHAAR JUDGMENT ) : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => justice-k-s-puttaswamy-retd-vs-union-of-india-aadhaar-judgment-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10067 [term_id] => 35 ) [281] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10067 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-23 21:24:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => JUSTICE K. S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD.) VS UNION OF INDIA ( AADHAAR JUDGMENT ) : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => justice-k-s-puttaswamy-retd-vs-union-of-india-aadhaar-judgment-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10067 [term_id] => 245 ) [282] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10722 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 10:40:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => K C GAJAPATI NARAYAN DEO VS STATE OF ORISSA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => k-c-gajapati-narayan-deo-vs-state-of-orissa-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10722 [term_id] => 35 ) [283] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10722 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 10:40:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => K C GAJAPATI NARAYAN DEO VS STATE OF ORISSA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => k-c-gajapati-narayan-deo-vs-state-of-orissa-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10722 [term_id] => 245 ) [284] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10328 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-02 19:13:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => K KISHAN VS M/S VIJAY NIRMAN COMPANY PVT LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => k-kishan-vs-m-s-vijay-nirman-company-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10328 [term_id] => 35 ) [285] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10328 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-02 19:13:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => K KISHAN VS M/S VIJAY NIRMAN COMPANY PVT LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => k-kishan-vs-m-s-vijay-nirman-company-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10328 [term_id] => 244 ) [286] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10324 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-06-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-30 20:46:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => K SASHIDHAR VS INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => k-sashidhar-vs-indian-overseas-bank-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10324 [term_id] => 35 ) [287] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10324 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-06-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-30 20:46:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => K SASHIDHAR VS INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => k-sashidhar-vs-indian-overseas-bank-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10324 [term_id] => 244 ) [288] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10354 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-11 22:36:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => K. PARAMASIVAM VS THE KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => k-paramasivam-vs-the-karur-vysya-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10354 [term_id] => 35 ) [289] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10354 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-11 22:36:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => K. PARAMASIVAM VS THE KARUR VYSYA BANK LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => k-paramasivam-vs-the-karur-vysya-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10354 [term_id] => 244 ) [290] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9864 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-10 13:54:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KAILASH NATH ASSOCIATES VS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kailash-nath-associates-vs-delhi-development-authority-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9864 [term_id] => 35 ) [291] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10397 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-22 10:02:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KALPRAJ DHARMASHI VS KOTAK INVESTMENT ADVISORS LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kalpraj-dharmashi-vs-kotak-investment-advisors-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10397 [term_id] => 35 ) [292] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10397 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-22 10:02:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KALPRAJ DHARMASHI VS KOTAK INVESTMENT ADVISORS LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kalpraj-dharmashi-vs-kotak-investment-advisors-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10397 [term_id] => 244 ) [293] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10556 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-09 20:58:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KATZ VS UNITED STATES : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => katz-vs-united-states-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10556 [term_id] => 243 ) [294] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11556 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-05-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-29 12:26:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KAUSHAL KISHORE VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kaushal-kishore-vs-state-of-uttar-pradesh-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11556 [term_id] => 35 ) [295] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10375 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-17 14:16:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KAY BOUVET ENGINEERING LTD VS OVERSEAS INFRASTUCTURE PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kay-bouvet-engineering-ltd-vs-overseas-infrastucture-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10375 [term_id] => 35 ) [296] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10375 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-17 14:16:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KAY BOUVET ENGINEERING LTD VS OVERSEAS INFRASTUCTURE PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kay-bouvet-engineering-ltd-vs-overseas-infrastucture-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10375 [term_id] => 244 ) [297] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9629 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-02-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-05 13:22:50 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Keisham Meghachandra Singh Vs The Hon'ble Speaker Manipur Legislative Assembly : Case Summary [post_name] => keisham-meghachandra-singh-vs-the-honble-speaker-manipur-legislative-assembly-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9629 [term_id] => 35 ) [298] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9629 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-02-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-05 13:22:50 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Keisham Meghachandra Singh Vs The Hon'ble Speaker Manipur Legislative Assembly : Case Summary [post_name] => keisham-meghachandra-singh-vs-the-honble-speaker-manipur-legislative-assembly-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9629 [term_id] => 245 ) [299] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10789 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-26 14:54:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KESVANAND BHARATI VS STATE OF KERALA : BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE CONSTITUTION CANNOT BE AMENDED [post_name] => kesvanand-bharati-vs-state-of-kerala-basic-structure-of-the-constitution-cannot-be-amended [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10789 [term_id] => 35 ) [300] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10789 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-26 14:54:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KESVANAND BHARATI VS STATE OF KERALA : BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE CONSTITUTION CANNOT BE AMENDED [post_name] => kesvanand-bharati-vs-state-of-kerala-basic-structure-of-the-constitution-cannot-be-amended [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10789 [term_id] => 245 ) [301] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10663 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-13 10:54:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KHARAK SINGH VS STATE OF U.P. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kharak-singh-vs-state-of-u-p-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10663 [term_id] => 35 ) [302] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10663 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-13 10:54:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KHARAK SINGH VS STATE OF U.P. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kharak-singh-vs-state-of-u-p-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10663 [term_id] => 245 ) [303] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9817 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-29 16:08:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KIHOTO HOLLOHAN VS ZACHILLHU AND OTHERS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kihoto-hollohan-vs-zachillhu-and-others-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9817 [term_id] => 35 ) [304] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9817 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-03-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-29 16:08:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KIHOTO HOLLOHAN VS ZACHILLHU AND OTHERS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => kihoto-hollohan-vs-zachillhu-and-others-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9817 [term_id] => 245 ) [305] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2389 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 16:11:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Koremastu Vs United States : Internment Of Only Japanese Americans Was Valid [post_name] => koremastu-vs-united-states-internment-of-only-japanese-americans-was-valid [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2389 [term_id] => 243 ) [306] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10608 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-27 12:52:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH VS STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => krishna-kumar-singh-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10608 [term_id] => 35 ) [307] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10608 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-27 12:52:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => KRISHNA KUMAR SINGH VS STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => krishna-kumar-singh-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10608 [term_id] => 245 ) [308] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10033 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-22 19:00:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => L. CHANDRA KUMAR VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => l-chandra-kumar-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10033 [term_id] => 35 ) [309] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10033 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-22 19:00:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => L. CHANDRA KUMAR VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => l-chandra-kumar-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10033 [term_id] => 245 ) [310] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1215 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-06-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-10 07:46:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Lalit Kumar Jain VS Union of India & Ors : The Supreme Court Held Valid Notification Regarding Applicability Of IBC Provisions TO Personal Guarantors [post_name] => lalit-kumar-jain-vs-union-of-india [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 1215 [term_id] => 35 ) [311] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1215 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-06-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-10 07:46:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Lalit Kumar Jain VS Union of India & Ors : The Supreme Court Held Valid Notification Regarding Applicability Of IBC Provisions TO Personal Guarantors [post_name] => lalit-kumar-jain-vs-union-of-india [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 1215 [term_id] => 244 ) [312] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9979 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-12 13:07:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LALITA KUMARI VS GOVT OF UP : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => lalita-kumari-vs-govt-of-up-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9979 [term_id] => 35 ) [313] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9979 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-12 13:07:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LALITA KUMARI VS GOVT OF UP : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => lalita-kumari-vs-govt-of-up-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9979 [term_id] => 245 ) [314] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10560 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-10 18:42:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LAWRENCE VS TEXAS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => lawrence-vs-texas-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10560 [term_id] => 243 ) [315] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 364 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-02-13 16:56:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LAXMIPAT SURANA VS UNION BANK OF INDIA & ANR (CASE ANALYSIS) [post_name] => laxmipat-surana-vs-union-of-india [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 364 [term_id] => 35 ) [316] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 364 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-02-13 16:56:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LAXMIPAT SURANA VS UNION BANK OF INDIA & ANR (CASE ANALYSIS) [post_name] => laxmipat-surana-vs-union-of-india [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 364 [term_id] => 244 ) [317] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 738 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-05-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-21 17:54:58 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Legal Notice Format [post_name] => legal-notice-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 738 [term_id] => 1 ) [318] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 762 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-05-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-22 11:47:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Legal Notice Format Under Section 138 NI Act [post_name] => legal-notice-format-under-section-138-ni-act [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 762 [term_id] => 1 ) [319] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1430 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-08-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-10 14:31:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LEGISLATIVE RELATIONS BETWEEN UNION AND STATES [post_name] => legislative-relations-between-the-union-and-states [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1430 [term_id] => 162 ) [320] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1430 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-08-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-10 14:31:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LEGISLATIVE RELATIONS BETWEEN UNION AND STATES [post_name] => legislative-relations-between-the-union-and-states [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1430 [term_id] => 242 ) [321] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10846 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 17:44:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LIABILITY FOR PRIOR OFFENCES UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => liability-for-prior-offences-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10846 [term_id] => 170 ) [322] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10850 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 17:57:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LIQUIDATION OF CORPORATE DEBTOR UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => liquidation-of-corporate-debtor-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10850 [term_id] => 170 ) [323] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10856 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 18:21:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LIQUIDATON ESTATE AND REALISATION OF ASSETS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => liquidaton-estate-and-realisation-of-assets-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10856 [term_id] => 170 ) [324] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2385 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 15:58:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Lochner Vs New York : State Can Not Prescribe Maximum Hours For Workers [post_name] => lochner-vs-new-york-state-can-not-prescribe-maximum-hours-for-workers [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2385 [term_id] => 243 ) [325] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10589 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-15 15:00:03 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LOPER BRIGHT ENTERPRISES VS RAIMONDO : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => loper-bright-enterprises-vs-raimondo-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10589 [term_id] => 243 ) [326] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10544 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-08 21:33:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => LOVING VS VIRGINIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => loving-vs-virginia-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10544 [term_id] => 243 ) [327] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10711 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-15 19:26:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M C MEHTA VS KAMAL NATH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-c-mehta-vs-kamal-nath-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10711 [term_id] => 35 ) [328] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10711 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-15 19:26:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M C MEHTA VS KAMAL NATH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-c-mehta-vs-kamal-nath-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10711 [term_id] => 245 ) [329] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10713 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-15 22:52:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M C MEHTA VS UNION OF INDIA (OLEUM LEAK CASE) [post_name] => m-c-mehta-vs-union-of-india-oleum-leak-case [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10713 [term_id] => 35 ) [330] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10713 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-15 22:52:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M C MEHTA VS UNION OF INDIA (OLEUM LEAK CASE) [post_name] => m-c-mehta-vs-union-of-india-oleum-leak-case [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10713 [term_id] => 245 ) [331] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10732 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-18 12:38:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M NAGARAJ VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-nagaraj-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10732 [term_id] => 35 ) [332] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10732 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-18 12:38:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M NAGARAJ VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-nagaraj-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10732 [term_id] => 245 ) [333] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10645 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-09 19:05:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M. H. HOSKOT VS STATE OF MAHARASTRA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-h-hoskot-vs-state-of-maharastra-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10645 [term_id] => 35 ) [334] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10645 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-09 19:05:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M. H. HOSKOT VS STATE OF MAHARASTRA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-h-hoskot-vs-state-of-maharastra-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10645 [term_id] => 245 ) [335] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10441 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-08-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-13 13:35:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M. R. BALAJI VS STATE OF MYSORE : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-r-balaji-vs-state-of-mysore-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10441 [term_id] => 35 ) [336] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10441 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-08-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-13 13:35:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M. R. BALAJI VS STATE OF MYSORE : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-r-balaji-vs-state-of-mysore-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10441 [term_id] => 245 ) [337] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 646 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-05-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-15 07:11:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M. Suresh Kumar Reddy VS. Canara Bank (Case Summary ) [post_name] => m-suresh-kumar-reddy-vs-canara-bank [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 646 [term_id] => 35 ) [338] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 646 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-05-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-15 07:11:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M. Suresh Kumar Reddy VS. Canara Bank (Case Summary ) [post_name] => m-suresh-kumar-reddy-vs-canara-bank [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 646 [term_id] => 244 ) [339] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10373 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-17 11:11:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M/s JAI BALA JI INDUSTRIES VS. D. K. MOHANTI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-s-jai-bala-ji-industries-vs-d-k-mohanti-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10373 [term_id] => 35 ) [340] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10373 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-17 11:11:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M/s JAI BALA JI INDUSTRIES VS. D. K. MOHANTI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-s-jai-bala-ji-industries-vs-d-k-mohanti-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10373 [term_id] => 244 ) [341] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10381 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-18 23:12:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M/S ORATOR MARKETING PVT. LTD. VS M/S SAMTEX DESINZ PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-s-orator-marketing-pvt-ltd-vs-m-s-samtex-desinz-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10381 [term_id] => 35 ) [342] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10381 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-18 23:12:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M/S ORATOR MARKETING PVT. LTD. VS M/S SAMTEX DESINZ PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-s-orator-marketing-pvt-ltd-vs-m-s-samtex-desinz-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10381 [term_id] => 244 ) [343] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10410 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-24 21:23:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M/S SURENDRA TRADING COMPANY VS M/S JUGGILAL KAMLAPAT JUTE MILLS COMPANY LTD AND OTHERS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-s-surendra-trading-company-vs-m-s-juggilal-kamlapat-jute-mills-company-ltd-and-others-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10410 [term_id] => 35 ) [344] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10410 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-24 21:23:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => M/S SURENDRA TRADING COMPANY VS M/S JUGGILAL KAMLAPAT JUTE MILLS COMPANY LTD AND OTHERS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => m-s-surendra-trading-company-vs-m-s-juggilal-kamlapat-jute-mills-company-ltd-and-others-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10410 [term_id] => 244 ) [345] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10407 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-24 18:23:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MACQUARIE BANK LTD VS SHILPI CABLE TECHNOLOGIES LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => macquarie-bank-ltd-vs-shilpi-cable-technologies-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10407 [term_id] => 35 ) [346] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10407 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-24 18:23:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MACQUARIE BANK LTD VS SHILPI CABLE TECHNOLOGIES LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => macquarie-bank-ltd-vs-shilpi-cable-technologies-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10407 [term_id] => 244 ) [347] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10023 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-21 13:29:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MADRAS BAR ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA (2020) : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => madras-bar-association-vs-union-of-india-2020-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10023 [term_id] => 35 ) [348] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10023 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-21 13:29:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MADRAS BAR ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA (2020) : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => madras-bar-association-vs-union-of-india-2020-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10023 [term_id] => 245 ) [349] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10331 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-07 19:00:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MAHARASTRA SEAMLESS VS PADMANABHAN VENKATESH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => maharastra-seamless-vs-padmanabhan-venkatesh-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10331 [term_id] => 35 ) [350] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10331 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-07 19:00:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MAHARASTRA SEAMLESS VS PADMANABHAN VENKATESH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => maharastra-seamless-vs-padmanabhan-venkatesh-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10331 [term_id] => 244 ) [351] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9732 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-02-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-27 16:34:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MANEKA GANDHI VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => maneka-gandhi-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9732 [term_id] => 35 ) [352] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9732 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-02-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-27 16:34:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MANEKA GANDHI VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => maneka-gandhi-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9732 [term_id] => 245 ) [353] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10420 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-27 22:43:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MANISH KUMAR VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => manish-kumar-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10420 [term_id] => 35 ) [354] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10420 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-27 22:43:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MANISH KUMAR VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => manish-kumar-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10420 [term_id] => 244 ) [355] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2379 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 15:38:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Marbury Vs Madison : Supreme Court has power of judicial review [post_name] => marbury-vs-madison-supreme-court-has-power-of-judicial-review [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2379 [term_id] => 243 ) [356] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10709 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-15 12:14:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MARU RAM VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => maru-ram-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10709 [term_id] => 35 ) [357] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10709 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-15 12:14:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MARU RAM VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => maru-ram-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10709 [term_id] => 245 ) [358] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10537 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-07 18:14:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MCCULLOCH VS. MARYLAND : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => mcculloch-vs-maryland-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10537 [term_id] => 243 ) [359] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10562 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-11 14:04:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MICHAEL H VS GERALD D. : CASE SUMMRAY [post_name] => michael-h-vs-gerald-d-case-summray [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10562 [term_id] => 243 ) [360] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10010 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-14 12:52:36 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MINERVA MILLS LTD VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => minerva-mills-ltd-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10010 [term_id] => 35 ) [361] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10010 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-14 12:52:36 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MINERVA MILLS LTD VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => minerva-mills-ltd-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10010 [term_id] => 245 ) [362] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2401 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 16:47:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Miranda Vs Arizona : Accused Has To Be Informed About His Right To Remain Silent During Interrogation [post_name] => miranda-vs-arizona-accused-has-to-be-informed-about-his-right-to-remain-silent-during-interrogation [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2401 [term_id] => 243 ) [363] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10724 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 12:40:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MISS MOHINI JAIN VS STATE OF KARNATAKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => miss-mohini-jain-vs-state-of-karnataka-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10724 [term_id] => 35 ) [364] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10724 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 12:40:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MISS MOHINI JAIN VS STATE OF KARNATAKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => miss-mohini-jain-vs-state-of-karnataka-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10724 [term_id] => 244 ) [365] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9499 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-01-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-26 07:43:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MOBILE AND INTERNET ASSOCIATION OF INDIA VS RESERVE BANK OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => mobile-and-internet-association-of-india-vs-reserve-bank-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9499 [term_id] => 35 ) [366] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1185 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-05 12:38:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. VS Kirusa Software Pvt. Ltd. ( Case Summary ) [post_name] => mobilox-innovtions-pvt-ltd-vs-kirusa-software-pvt-ltd-case-analysis [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1185 [term_id] => 162 ) [367] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1185 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-05 12:38:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. VS Kirusa Software Pvt. Ltd. ( Case Summary ) [post_name] => mobilox-innovtions-pvt-ltd-vs-kirusa-software-pvt-ltd-case-analysis [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1185 [term_id] => 170 ) [368] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11062 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2025-01-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-01-09 20:08:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MOHAMMED ENTERPRISES ( TANZANIA ) LTD. VS FAROOQ ALI KHAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => mohammed-enterprises-tanzania-ltd-vs-farooq-ali-khan-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 11062 [term_id] => 244 ) [369] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10726 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 17:43:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MOHD AHAMAD KHAN VS SHAH BANO : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => mohd-ahamad-khan-vs-shah-bano-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10726 [term_id] => 35 ) [370] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10726 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 17:43:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MOHD AHAMAD KHAN VS SHAH BANO : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => mohd-ahamad-khan-vs-shah-bano-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10726 [term_id] => 245 ) [371] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1197 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-08 13:01:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Moratorium Under IBC [post_name] => moratorium-under-ibc [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1197 [term_id] => 162 ) [372] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1197 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-08 13:01:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Moratorium Under IBC [post_name] => moratorium-under-ibc [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1197 [term_id] => 170 ) [373] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 631 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-05-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-09 12:05:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Moser Baer Karamchari Union VS Union Of India And Ors (Case Summary) [post_name] => moser-baer-karamchari-union-vs-union-of-india [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 631 [term_id] => 35 ) [374] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 631 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-05-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-09 12:05:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Moser Baer Karamchari Union VS Union Of India And Ors (Case Summary) [post_name] => moser-baer-karamchari-union-vs-union-of-india [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 631 [term_id] => 244 ) [375] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2227 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-10-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-29 16:55:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MOUNTING JUDICIAL PENDENCIES AND ARREARS : IS THERE A WAY AHEAD ? [post_name] => mounting-judicial-pendencies-and-arrears-is-there-a-way-ahead [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2227 [term_id] => 162 ) [376] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2227 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-10-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-29 16:55:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MOUNTING JUDICIAL PENDENCIES AND ARREARS : IS THERE A WAY AHEAD ? [post_name] => mounting-judicial-pendencies-and-arrears-is-there-a-way-ahead [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2227 [term_id] => 242 ) [377] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9883 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-19 14:33:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UJJAIN VS BVG INDIA LTD: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => municipal-corporation-ujjain-vs-bvg-india-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9883 [term_id] => 35 ) [378] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10389 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-20 11:25:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NAGAITLANG DHAR VS. PANNA PRAGATI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. & ORS. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => nagaitlang-dhar-vs-panna-pragati-infrastructure-pvt-ltd-ors-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10389 [term_id] => 35 ) [379] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10389 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-20 11:25:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NAGAITLANG DHAR VS. PANNA PRAGATI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. & ORS. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => nagaitlang-dhar-vs-panna-pragati-infrastructure-pvt-ltd-ors-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10389 [term_id] => 244 ) [380] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11551 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-05-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-24 12:30:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NANDINI SUNDAR VS STATE OF CHATTISGARH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => nandini-sundar-vs-state-of-chattisgarh-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11551 [term_id] => 35 ) [381] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11551 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2025-05-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-24 12:30:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NANDINI SUNDAR VS STATE OF CHATTISGARH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => nandini-sundar-vs-state-of-chattisgarh-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 11551 [term_id] => 245 ) [382] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9786 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-20 22:17:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => national-legal-services-authority-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9786 [term_id] => 35 ) [383] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10321 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-06-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-30 13:20:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NATIONAL SPOT EXCHANGE LTD VS MR. ANIL KOHLI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => national-spot-exchange-ltd-vs-mr-anil-kohli-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10321 [term_id] => 35 ) [384] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10321 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-06-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-30 13:20:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NATIONAL SPOT EXCHANGE LTD VS MR. ANIL KOHLI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => national-spot-exchange-ltd-vs-mr-anil-kohli-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10321 [term_id] => 244 ) [385] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10760 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-19 17:31:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NAVEEN JINDAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => naveen-jindal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10760 [term_id] => 35 ) [386] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10760 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-19 17:31:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NAVEEN JINDAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => naveen-jindal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10760 [term_id] => 245 ) [387] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10326 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-02 12:00:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL VS. MINOSHA INDIA LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => new-delhi-municipal-council-vs-minosha-india-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10326 [term_id] => 35 ) [388] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10326 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-02 12:00:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL VS. MINOSHA INDIA LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => new-delhi-municipal-council-vs-minosha-india-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10326 [term_id] => 244 ) [389] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10405 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-24 11:25:24 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. ANAND SONBHADRA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => new-okhla-industrial-development-authority-vs-anand-sonbhadra-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10405 [term_id] => 35 ) [390] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10405 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-24 11:25:24 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. ANAND SONBHADRA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => new-okhla-industrial-development-authority-vs-anand-sonbhadra-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10405 [term_id] => 244 ) [391] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10568 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-13 11:14:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NEW YORK TIMES VS UNITED STATES : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => new-york-times-vs-united-states-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10568 [term_id] => 243 ) [392] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10065 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-23 14:31:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => NOVARTIS AG VS UNION OF INDIA: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => novartis-ag-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10065 [term_id] => 35 ) [393] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10572 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-14 10:37:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => OBERGEFELL VS HODGES : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => obergefell-vs-hodges-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10572 [term_id] => 243 ) [394] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11086 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 10:57:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => OBJECTIVES OF PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => objectives-of-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11086 [term_id] => 241 ) [395] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10884 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 20:04:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => OFFENCES AND PENALTIES UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => offences-and-penalties-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10884 [term_id] => 170 ) [396] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1332 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-21 17:31:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => OFFICE OF GOVERNOR : WHETHER CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD OF STATE OR AGENT OF CENTRE ? [post_name] => office-of-governor-whether-constitutional-head-of-state-or-agent-of-centre [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1332 [term_id] => 162 ) [397] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1332 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-21 17:31:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => OFFICE OF GOVERNOR : WHETHER CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD OF STATE OR AGENT OF CENTRE ? [post_name] => office-of-governor-whether-constitutional-head-of-state-or-agent-of-centre [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1332 [term_id] => 242 ) [398] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2242 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-11-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-03 15:16:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ONE NATION ONE ELECTION : WHETHER FEASIBLE PROPOSITION ? [post_name] => one-nation-one-election-whether-feasible-proposition [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2242 [term_id] => 162 ) [399] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2242 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-11-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-03 15:16:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ONE NATION ONE ELECTION : WHETHER FEASIBLE PROPOSITION ? [post_name] => one-nation-one-election-whether-feasible-proposition [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2242 [term_id] => 242 ) [400] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9740 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-02 07:30:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => P RAMA CHANDRA RAO VS STATE OF KARNATKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => p-rama-chandra-rao-vs-state-of-karnatka-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9740 [term_id] => 35 ) [401] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10358 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-12 21:22:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => P. MOHANRAJ & ORS VS. M/S SHAH BROTHERS ISPAT PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => p-mohanraj-ors-vs-m-s-shah-brothers-ispat-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10358 [term_id] => 35 ) [402] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10358 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-12 21:22:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => P. MOHANRAJ & ORS VS. M/S SHAH BROTHERS ISPAT PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => p-mohanraj-ors-vs-m-s-shah-brothers-ispat-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10358 [term_id] => 244 ) [403] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10597 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-23 14:31:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PANDIT M. S. M. SHARMA VS SRI KRISHAN SINHA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => pandit-m-s-m-sharma-vs-sri-krishan-sinha-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10597 [term_id] => 35 ) [404] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10597 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-23 14:31:42 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PANDIT M. S. M. SHARMA VS SRI KRISHAN SINHA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => pandit-m-s-m-sharma-vs-sri-krishan-sinha-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10597 [term_id] => 245 ) [405] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1291 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-08 12:53:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PARLIAMENTARY CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL MATTERS [post_name] => parliamentary-control-over-financial-matters [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1291 [term_id] => 162 ) [406] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1291 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-08 12:53:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PARLIAMENTARY CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL MATTERS [post_name] => parliamentary-control-over-financial-matters [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1291 [term_id] => 242 ) [407] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11070 [slug] => articles [date] => 2025-02-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-04 12:25:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PARTS OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => parts-of-indian-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 11070 [term_id] => 162 ) [408] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11070 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2025-02-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-04 12:25:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PARTS OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => parts-of-indian-constitution [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 11070 [term_id] => 242 ) [409] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1329 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-19 06:21:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd. VS Raman Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (Case Summary) [post_name] => paschimanchal-vidyut-vitaran-nigam-ltd-vs-raman-ispat-pvt-ltd [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1329 [term_id] => 162 ) [410] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1329 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-07-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-19 06:21:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd. VS Raman Ispat Pvt. Ltd. (Case Summary) [post_name] => paschimanchal-vidyut-vitaran-nigam-ltd-vs-raman-ispat-pvt-ltd [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1329 [term_id] => 170 ) [411] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1287 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-07 12:39:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PASSING OF MONEY BILLS BY PARLIAMENT [post_name] => passing-of-money-bills-by-indian-parliament [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1287 [term_id] => 162 ) [412] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1287 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-07 12:39:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PASSING OF MONEY BILLS BY PARLIAMENT [post_name] => passing-of-money-bills-by-indian-parliament [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1287 [term_id] => 242 ) [413] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1284 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-04 12:33:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PASSING OF ORDINARY BILLS BY PARLIAMENT [post_name] => passing-of-ordinary-bills-by-parliament [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1284 [term_id] => 162 ) [414] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1284 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-04 12:33:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PASSING OF ORDINARY BILLS BY PARLIAMENT [post_name] => passing-of-ordinary-bills-by-parliament [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1284 [term_id] => 242 ) [415] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10362 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-14 18:05:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PHOENIX ARC PVT. LTD. VS. SPADE FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => phoenix-arc-pvt-ltd-vs-spade-financial-services-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10362 [term_id] => 35 ) [416] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10362 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-14 18:05:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PHOENIX ARC PVT. LTD. VS. SPADE FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => phoenix-arc-pvt-ltd-vs-spade-financial-services-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10362 [term_id] => 244 ) [417] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 376 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-02-13 17:32:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PIONEER URBAN LAND & ORS VS. UNION OF INDIA (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => pioneer-urban-land [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 376 [term_id] => 35 ) [418] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 376 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-02-13 17:32:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PIONEER URBAN LAND & ORS VS. UNION OF INDIA (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => pioneer-urban-land [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 376 [term_id] => 244 ) [419] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1273 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-07-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-03 00:24:46 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Plessy VS Ferguson : Separate Treatment To White And Colored Persons Are Valid [post_name] => plessy-vs-ferguson-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 1273 [term_id] => 243 ) [420] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 745 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-05-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-21 18:06:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Police Complaint Format [post_name] => police-complaint [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 745 [term_id] => 1 ) [421] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10828 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 16:06:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => POSITION OF HOME BUYERS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => position-of-home-buyers-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10828 [term_id] => 162 ) [422] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10828 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 16:06:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => POSITION OF HOME BUYERS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => position-of-home-buyers-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10828 [term_id] => 170 ) [423] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1294 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-09 16:31:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => POWER OF THE PRESIDENT TO ISSUE ORDINANCE UNDER ARTICLE 123 [post_name] => power-of-president-to-issue-ordinance [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1294 [term_id] => 162 ) [424] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1294 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-07-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-09 16:31:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => POWER OF THE PRESIDENT TO ISSUE ORDINANCE UNDER ARTICLE 123 [post_name] => power-of-president-to-issue-ordinance [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1294 [term_id] => 242 ) [425] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9841 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-04-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-04 18:56:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => POWER OF THE SUPREME COURT TO DO COMPLETE JUSTICE UNDER ARTICLE 142 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA [post_name] => power-of-the-supreme-court-to-do-complete-justice-under-article-142-of-the-constitution-of-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9841 [term_id] => 162 ) [426] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10834 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 16:34:17 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => POWERS AND DUTIES OF INTERIM RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => powers-and-duties-of-interim-resolution-professional-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10834 [term_id] => 170 ) [427] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1240 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-18 08:23:46 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF PRESIDENT OF INDIA [post_name] => the-president-of-india-and-his-constitutional-position [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1240 [term_id] => 162 ) [428] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1240 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-18 08:23:46 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF PRESIDENT OF INDIA [post_name] => the-president-of-india-and-his-constitutional-position [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1240 [term_id] => 242 ) [429] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9875 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-14 11:23:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRADEEP KUMAR BISWAS VS INDIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL BIOLOGY : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => pradeep-kumar-biswas-vs-indian-institute-of-chemical-biology-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9875 [term_id] => 35 ) [430] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9875 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-04-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-14 11:23:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRADEEP KUMAR BISWAS VS INDIAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL BIOLOGY : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => pradeep-kumar-biswas-vs-indian-institute-of-chemical-biology-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9875 [term_id] => 245 ) [431] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9734 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-02-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-28 05:07:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRAMATI EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL TRUST VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => pramati-educational-and-cultural-trust-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9734 [term_id] => 35 ) [432] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9734 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-02-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-28 05:07:45 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRAMATI EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL TRUST VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => pramati-educational-and-cultural-trust-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9734 [term_id] => 245 ) [433] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10387 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-19 23:35:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRATAP TECHNOCRATS (P) LTD. & ORS VS MONITORING COMMITTEE OF RELIANCE INFRATEL LTD. & ANR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => pratap-technocrats-p-ltd-ors-vs-monitoring-committee-of-reliance-infratel-ltd-anr-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10387 [term_id] => 35 ) [434] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10387 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-19 23:35:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRATAP TECHNOCRATS (P) LTD. & ORS VS MONITORING COMMITTEE OF RELIANCE INFRATEL LTD. & ANR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => pratap-technocrats-p-ltd-ors-vs-monitoring-committee-of-reliance-infratel-ltd-anr-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10387 [term_id] => 244 ) [435] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10870 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 19:22:36 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRE-PACKAGED INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => pre-packaged-insolvency-resolution-process-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10870 [term_id] => 170 ) [436] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 546 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-04-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-17 11:23:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PREAMBLE TO THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => preamble-to-the-indian-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 546 [term_id] => 162 ) [437] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 546 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-04-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-17 11:23:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PREAMBLE TO THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => preamble-to-the-indian-constitution [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 546 [term_id] => 242 ) [438] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10639 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-08 09:27:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PREM SHANKAR SHUKLA VS DELHI ADMINISTRATION : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => prem-shankar-shukla-vs-delhi-administration-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10639 [term_id] => 35 ) [439] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10639 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-08 09:27:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PREM SHANKAR SHUKLA VS DELHI ADMINISTRATION : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => prem-shankar-shukla-vs-delhi-administration-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10639 [term_id] => 245 ) [440] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2230 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-10-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-30 16:06:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRESSURE GROUPS IN INDIA AND THIER REGULATION [post_name] => pressure-groups-in-india-and-their-regulation [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2230 [term_id] => 162 ) [441] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2230 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-10-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-30 16:06:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRESSURE GROUPS IN INDIA AND THIER REGULATION [post_name] => pressure-groups-in-india-and-their-regulation [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2230 [term_id] => 242 ) [442] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10071 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-05-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-26 23:47:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND CLIENT [post_name] => privileged-communication-between-advocate-and-client [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10071 [term_id] => 162 ) [443] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10071 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-05-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-26 23:47:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION BETWEEN ADVOCATE AND CLIENT [post_name] => privileged-communication-between-advocate-and-client [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 10071 [term_id] => 246 ) [444] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11105 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 19:12:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PROCEDURE OF FILING APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 12 OF PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => procedure-of-filing-application-under-section-12-of-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11105 [term_id] => 241 ) [445] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9800 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-03-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-25 16:50:58 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT BY ADVOCATES AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS [post_name] => professional-misconduct-by-advocates-and-disciplinary-proceedings [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9800 [term_id] => 162 ) [446] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9800 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-03-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-25 16:50:58 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT BY ADVOCATES AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS [post_name] => professional-misconduct-by-advocates-and-disciplinary-proceedings [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 9800 [term_id] => 246 ) [447] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10836 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 16:40:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT AND COLLATION OF CLAIMS UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => public-announcement-and-collation-of-claims-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10836 [term_id] => 170 ) [448] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10799 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-11-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-29 12:45:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PUBLIC INTEREST FOUNDATION VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => public-interest-foundation-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10799 [term_id] => 162 ) [449] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10799 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-29 12:45:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PUBLIC INTEREST FOUNDATION VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => public-interest-foundation-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10799 [term_id] => 245 ) [450] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9838 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-04-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-04 13:49:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION IN INDIA AND ITS ABUSES [post_name] => public-interest-litigation-in-india-and-its-abuses [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9838 [term_id] => 162 ) [451] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9950 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-05 12:13:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION UNDER ARTICLE 32 FORMAT [post_name] => public-interest-litigation-under-article-32-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9950 [term_id] => 1 ) [452] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9877 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-04-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-16 10:15:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => QUASHING PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 CRPC FORMAT [post_name] => quashing-petition-under-section-482-crpc-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9877 [term_id] => 1 ) [453] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11422 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2025-03-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-27 18:39:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => QUESTIONS OF LAW, SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW, SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW OF GENERAL IMPORTANCE AND SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS TO INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION [post_name] => questions-of-law-substantial-questions-of-law-substantial-questions-of-law-of-general-importance-and-substantial-questions-of-law-as-to-interpretation-of-the-constitution [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 11422 [term_id] => 242 ) [454] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10368 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-16 18:28:17 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RADHA EXPORTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD VS K P JAYARAM & ORS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => radha-exports-india-pvt-ltd-vs-k-p-jayaram-ors-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10368 [term_id] => 35 ) [455] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10368 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-16 18:28:17 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RADHA EXPORTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD VS K P JAYARAM & ORS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => radha-exports-india-pvt-ltd-vs-k-p-jayaram-ors-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10368 [term_id] => 244 ) [456] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10459 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-08-31 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-31 16:42:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAI SAHIB RAM JAWAYA KAPUR VS STATE OF PUNJAB : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rai-sahib-ram-jawaya-kapur-vs-state-of-punjab-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10459 [term_id] => 35 ) [457] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10459 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-08-31 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-31 16:42:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAI SAHIB RAM JAWAYA KAPUR VS STATE OF PUNJAB : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rai-sahib-ram-jawaya-kapur-vs-state-of-punjab-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10459 [term_id] => 245 ) [458] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10599 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-24 00:04:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAJA RAM PAL VS HON’BLE SPEAKER , LOK SABHA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => raja-ram-pal-vs-honble-speaker-lok-sabha-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10599 [term_id] => 35 ) [459] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10599 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-24 00:04:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAJA RAM PAL VS HON’BLE SPEAKER , LOK SABHA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => raja-ram-pal-vs-honble-speaker-lok-sabha-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10599 [term_id] => 245 ) [460] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10371 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-16 21:28:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAJENDRA NAROTTAM DAS SHETH VS. CHANDRA PRAKASH JAIN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rajendra-narottam-das-sheth-vs-chandra-prakash-jain-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10371 [term_id] => 35 ) [461] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10371 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-16 21:28:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAJENDRA NAROTTAM DAS SHETH VS. CHANDRA PRAKASH JAIN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rajendra-narottam-das-sheth-vs-chandra-prakash-jain-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10371 [term_id] => 244 ) [462] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11528 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-04-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-04-30 19:31:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAKESH BHANOT VS M/S GURDAS AGRO PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rakesh-bhanot-vs-m-s-gurdas-agro-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11528 [term_id] => 35 ) [463] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11528 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2025-04-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-04-30 19:31:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAKESH BHANOT VS M/S GURDAS AGRO PVT. LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rakesh-bhanot-vs-m-s-gurdas-agro-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 11528 [term_id] => 244 ) [464] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10016 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-14 23:10:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAMESHWAR PRASAD VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rameshwar-prasad-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10016 [term_id] => 35 ) [465] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10016 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-14 23:10:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RAMESHWAR PRASAD VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rameshwar-prasad-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10016 [term_id] => 245 ) [466] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2333 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-11-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-25 04:17:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Ramkrishna Forgings Ltd Vs. Ravindra Loonkar: NCLT Direction For Fresh Valuation Of Assets After Approval Of Resolution Plan By CoC Was Not Justified [post_name] => ramkrishna-forgings-ltd-vs-ravindra-loonkar-nclt-direction-for-fresh-valuation-of-assets-after-approval-of-resolution-plan-by-coc-was-not-justified [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2333 [term_id] => 35 ) [467] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2333 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-11-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-25 04:17:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Ramkrishna Forgings Ltd Vs. Ravindra Loonkar: NCLT Direction For Fresh Valuation Of Assets After Approval Of Resolution Plan By CoC Was Not Justified [post_name] => ramkrishna-forgings-ltd-vs-ravindra-loonkar-nclt-direction-for-fresh-valuation-of-assets-after-approval-of-resolution-plan-by-coc-was-not-justified [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 2333 [term_id] => 244 ) [468] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11148 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2025-03-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-09 23:48:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RECUSAL OF JUDGE FROM HEARING AND FORUM SHOPPING [post_name] => recusal-of-judge-from-hearing-and-forum-shopping [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 11148 [term_id] => 246 ) [469] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1317 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-07-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-12 17:31:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Rejection Of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC [post_name] => rejection-of-plaint-under-order-7-rule-11-cpc [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1317 [term_id] => 162 ) [470] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10830 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 16:13:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RELATED PARTIES AND THEIR DISABILITIES UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => related-parties-and-their-disabilities-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10830 [term_id] => 170 ) [471] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11107 [slug] => pwdva [date] => 2025-02-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-22 19:43:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RELIEFS UNDER PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 [post_name] => reliefs-under-protection-of-women-from-domestic-violence-act-2005 [name] => PWDVA [object_id] => 11107 [term_id] => 241 ) [472] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10570 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-13 14:03:07 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RENO VS ACLU : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => reno-vs-aclu-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10570 [term_id] => 243 ) [473] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10864 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 18:47:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => REPORTING DURING LIQUIDATION UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => reporting-during-liquidation-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10864 [term_id] => 170 ) [474] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11144 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2025-03-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-07 13:45:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => REPORTING OF SUB JUDICE MATTERS AND FAIR TRIAL [post_name] => reporting-of-sub-judice-matters-and-fair-trial [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 11144 [term_id] => 246 ) [475] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10844 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 17:38:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RESOLUTION PLAN UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => resolution-plan-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10844 [term_id] => 170 ) [476] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10659 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-12 19:55:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => REV. STAINISLAUS VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rev-stainislaus-vs-state-of-madhya-pradesh-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10659 [term_id] => 35 ) [477] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10659 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-12 19:55:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => REV. STAINISLAUS VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rev-stainislaus-vs-state-of-madhya-pradesh-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10659 [term_id] => 245 ) [478] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9954 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-05 19:40:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => REVIEW PETITION FORMAT UNDER ARTICLE 137 [post_name] => review-petition-format-under-article-137 [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9954 [term_id] => 1 ) [479] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9844 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-04-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-04 21:29:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => REVIEW POWERS OF THE SUPREME COURT UNDER ARTICLE 137 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA [post_name] => review-powers-of-the-supreme-court-under-article-137-of-the-constitution-of-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9844 [term_id] => 162 ) [480] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10854 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 18:13:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => REVIVAL UNDER LIQUIDATION UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => revival-under-liquidation-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10854 [term_id] => 170 ) [481] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10583 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-15 12:13:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => REYNOLDS VS SIMS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => reynolds-vs-sims-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10583 [term_id] => 243 ) [482] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1208 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-09 08:34:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT AGAINST EXPLOITATOIN (ARTICLE 23 AND ARTICLE 24) [post_name] => right-against-exploitation-article-23-and-article-24 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1208 [term_id] => 162 ) [483] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1208 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-09 08:34:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT AGAINST EXPLOITATOIN (ARTICLE 23 AND ARTICLE 24) [post_name] => right-against-exploitation-article-23-and-article-24 [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1208 [term_id] => 242 ) [484] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10082 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-05-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-27 21:46:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT OF AN ADVOCATE TO PRACTICE LAW IN INDIA [post_name] => right-of-an-advocate-to-practice-law-in-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 10082 [term_id] => 162 ) [485] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10082 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-05-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-27 21:46:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT OF AN ADVOCATE TO PRACTICE LAW IN INDIA [post_name] => right-of-an-advocate-to-practice-law-in-india [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 10082 [term_id] => 246 ) [486] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 877 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-05-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-27 14:28:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT OF ARRESTED PERSONS AND PREVENTIVE DETENTION (ARTICLE 22) [post_name] => right-of-arrested-persons-and-preventive-detention-article-22 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 877 [term_id] => 162 ) [487] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 877 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-05-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-27 14:28:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT OF ARRESTED PERSONS AND PREVENTIVE DETENTION (ARTICLE 22) [post_name] => right-of-arrested-persons-and-preventive-detention-article-22 [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 877 [term_id] => 242 ) [488] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1230 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-15 08:59:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES (ART 32, 33, 34 & 35) [post_name] => right-to-constitutional-remedies-art-32-33-34-35 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1230 [term_id] => 162 ) [489] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1230 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-15 08:59:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES (ART 32, 33, 34 & 35) [post_name] => right-to-constitutional-remedies-art-32-33-34-35 [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1230 [term_id] => 242 ) [490] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 638 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-05-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-13 05:07:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO EQUALITY (ARTICLE 14-18) [post_name] => right-to-equality [name] => Articles [object_id] => 638 [term_id] => 162 ) [491] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 638 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-05-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-13 05:07:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO EQUALITY (ARTICLE 14-18) [post_name] => right-to-equality [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 638 [term_id] => 242 ) [492] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 650 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-05-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-19 17:25:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO FREEDOM (ARTICLE 19) [post_name] => right-to-freedom-article-19 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 650 [term_id] => 162 ) [493] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 650 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-05-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-19 17:25:25 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO FREEDOM (ARTICLE 19) [post_name] => right-to-freedom-article-19 [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 650 [term_id] => 242 ) [494] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1217 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-11 09:41:37 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF RELIGION (ARTICLE 25-28) [post_name] => right-to-freedom-of-religion-article-25-28 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1217 [term_id] => 162 ) [495] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1217 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-11 09:41:37 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF RELIGION (ARTICLE 25-28) [post_name] => right-to-freedom-of-religion-article-25-28 [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1217 [term_id] => 242 ) [496] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 769 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-05-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-24 11:35:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO LIFE AND PERSONAL LIBERTY AND ITS EXPANDING HORIZONS (ARTICLE 21) [post_name] => right-to-life-and-liberty-and-its-expanding-horizons-article-21 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 769 [term_id] => 162 ) [497] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 769 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-05-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-24 11:35:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RIGHT TO LIFE AND PERSONAL LIBERTY AND ITS EXPANDING HORIZONS (ARTICLE 21) [post_name] => right-to-life-and-liberty-and-its-expanding-horizons-article-21 [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 769 [term_id] => 242 ) [498] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2420 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-20 17:01:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Roe Vs Wade (1973 ) : Right To Abortion Included Under Right To Privacy [post_name] => roe-vs-wade-1973-right-to-abortion-included-under-right-to-privacy [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2420 [term_id] => 243 ) [499] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10021 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-19 21:52:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ROJER MATHEW VS SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rojer-mathew-vs-south-indian-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10021 [term_id] => 35 ) [500] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10021 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-19 21:52:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ROJER MATHEW VS SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rojer-mathew-vs-south-indian-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10021 [term_id] => 245 ) [501] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10626 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-10-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-20 21:15:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ROMESH THAPPAR VS. THE STATE OF MADRAS (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => romesh-thappar-vs-the-state-of-madras-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10626 [term_id] => 35 ) [502] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10626 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-10-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-20 21:15:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => ROMESH THAPPAR VS. THE STATE OF MADRAS (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => romesh-thappar-vs-the-state-of-madras-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10626 [term_id] => 245 ) [503] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1482 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-09-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-13 07:10:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RPS Infrastructure Vs. Mukul Kumar : The Supreme Court Observes That Once Resolution Plan Is Admitted Fresh Claims Can Not Be Admitted Under IBC [post_name] => rps-infrastructure-vs-mukul-kumar-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 1482 [term_id] => 35 ) [504] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1482 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-09-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-13 07:10:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RPS Infrastructure Vs. Mukul Kumar : The Supreme Court Observes That Once Resolution Plan Is Admitted Fresh Claims Can Not Be Admitted Under IBC [post_name] => rps-infrastructure-vs-mukul-kumar-case-summary [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1482 [term_id] => 162 ) [505] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10647 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-10 12:39:59 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RUDUL SAH VS STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rudul-sah-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10647 [term_id] => 35 ) [506] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10647 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-10 12:39:59 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RUDUL SAH VS STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rudul-sah-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10647 [term_id] => 245 ) [507] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9730 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-02-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-25 10:57:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RUPA ASHOK HURRA VS ASHOK HURRA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rupa-ashok-hurra-vs-ashok-hurra-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9730 [term_id] => 35 ) [508] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10634 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-07 17:14:58 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RUSTOM CAVASJEE COOPER VS UNION OF INDIA: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rustom-cavasjee-cooper-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10634 [term_id] => 35 ) [509] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10634 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-07 17:14:58 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => RUSTOM CAVASJEE COOPER VS UNION OF INDIA: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => rustom-cavasjee-cooper-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10634 [term_id] => 245 ) [510] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10661 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-12 23:51:16 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => S P MITTAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => s-p-mittal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10661 [term_id] => 35 ) [511] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10661 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-12 23:51:16 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => S P MITTAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => s-p-mittal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10661 [term_id] => 245 ) [512] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10628 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-10-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-21 11:12:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => S RANGARAJAN VS P JAGJIVAN RAM (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => s-rangarajan-vs-p-jagjivan-ram-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10628 [term_id] => 35 ) [513] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10628 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-10-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-10-21 11:12:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => S RANGARAJAN VS P JAGJIVAN RAM (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => s-rangarajan-vs-p-jagjivan-ram-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10628 [term_id] => 245 ) [514] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10031 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-22 13:43:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => S. R. BOMMAI VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => s-r-bommai-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10031 [term_id] => 35 ) [515] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10031 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-22 13:43:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => S. R. BOMMAI VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => s-r-bommai-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10031 [term_id] => 245 ) [516] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2344 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-12-01 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-01 10:12:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SAJJAN SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN : TREADING THE BEATEN PATH [post_name] => sajjan-singh-vs-state-of-rajasthan-treading-the-beaten-path [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2344 [term_id] => 35 ) [517] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2344 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2023-12-01 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-01 10:12:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SAJJAN SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN : TREADING THE BEATEN PATH [post_name] => sajjan-singh-vs-state-of-rajasthan-treading-the-beaten-path [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 2344 [term_id] => 245 ) [518] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2340 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-11-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-30 09:41:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SANKARI PRASAD DEO VS UNION OF INDIA : FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS NOT IMMUNE FROM AMENDMENT [post_name] => sankari-prasad-deo-vs-union-of-india-fundamental-rights-not-immune-from-amendment [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2340 [term_id] => 35 ) [519] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2340 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2023-11-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-30 09:41:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SANKARI PRASAD DEO VS UNION OF INDIA : FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS NOT IMMUNE FROM AMENDMENT [post_name] => sankari-prasad-deo-vs-union-of-india-fundamental-rights-not-immune-from-amendment [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 2340 [term_id] => 245 ) [520] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1156 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-04 09:51:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Sanket Kumar Aggarwal & Anr VS. APG Logistics Pvt. Ltd. ( Case Summary ) [post_name] => sanket-kumar-aggarwal-vs-apg-logistics-pvt-ltd [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1156 [term_id] => 162 ) [521] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1156 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-04 09:51:15 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Sanket Kumar Aggarwal & Anr VS. APG Logistics Pvt. Ltd. ( Case Summary ) [post_name] => sanket-kumar-aggarwal-vs-apg-logistics-pvt-ltd [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1156 [term_id] => 170 ) [522] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11151 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2025-03-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-12 13:00:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SARANGA ANILKUMAR AGGARWAL VS BHAVESH DHEERAJ LAL SHETH : MORATORIUM UNDER SECTION 96 IBC NOT APPLICABLE TO PENALTIES UNDER CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT [post_name] => saranga-anilkumar-aggarwal-vs-bhavesh-dheeraj-lal-sheth-case-summary [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 11151 [term_id] => 234 ) [523] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9826 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-31 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-31 20:44:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SBP AND CO VS PATEL ENGINEERING LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => sbp-and-co-vs-patel-engineering-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9826 [term_id] => 35 ) [524] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1277 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-07-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-03 07:54:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Schenk Vs. United States (Case Summary) [post_name] => schenk-vs-united-states [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 1277 [term_id] => 243 ) [525] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9851 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-04-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-06 11:53:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SCOPE OF BINDING NATURE OF LAW DECLARED BY SUPREME COURT UNDER ARTICLE 141 OF THE CONSTITUTION [post_name] => scope-of-binding-nature-of-declaration-of-supreme-court-under-article-141-of-the-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9851 [term_id] => 162 ) [526] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11156 [slug] => articles [date] => 2025-03-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-13 15:11:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SCOPE OF POWERS OF SUPEME COURT AND HIGH COURT TO APPOINT ARBITRATOR [post_name] => scope-of-powers-of-supeme-court-and-high-court-to-appoint-arbitrator [name] => Articles [object_id] => 11156 [term_id] => 162 ) [527] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9848 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-04-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-05 22:53:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SCOPE OF SPEACIAL LEAVE PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 136 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA [post_name] => scope-of-speacial-leave-petition-under-article-136-of-the-constitution-of-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9848 [term_id] => 162 ) [528] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11168 [slug] => articles [date] => 2025-03-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-15 16:06:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SCOPE OF THE FIVE PREROGATIVE WRITS (MANDAMUS, CERTIORARI, HABEUS CORPUS, PROHIBITION AND QUO WARRANTO) [post_name] => scope-of-the-five-prerogative-writs-mandamus-certiorari-habeus-corpus-prohibition-and-quo-warranto [name] => Articles [object_id] => 11168 [term_id] => 162 ) [529] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11066 [slug] => articles [date] => 2025-01-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-01-29 22:50:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SCOPE OF WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS [post_name] => scope-of-writ-of-habeus-corpus [name] => Articles [object_id] => 11066 [term_id] => 162 ) [530] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11066 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2025-01-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-01-29 22:50:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SCOPE OF WRIT OF HABEUS CORPUS [post_name] => scope-of-writ-of-habeus-corpus [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 11066 [term_id] => 242 ) [531] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11162 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2025-03-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-03-14 11:37:27 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SECTION 145(2) OF NEGOTIATIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT, 1881 APPLICATION FORMAT [post_name] => section-1452-of-negotiatiable-instrument-act-1881-application-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 11162 [term_id] => 1 ) [532] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9915 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-21 17:14:46 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SELVI VS STATE OF KARNATKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => selvi-vs-state-of-karnatka-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9915 [term_id] => 35 ) [533] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9915 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-04-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-21 17:14:46 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SELVI VS STATE OF KARNATKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => selvi-vs-state-of-karnatka-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9915 [term_id] => 245 ) [534] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1474 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-09-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-09 08:14:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SERVICE UNDER THE UNION AND THE STATES [post_name] => services-under-the-union-and-the-states [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1474 [term_id] => 162 ) [535] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1474 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-09-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-09 08:14:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SERVICE UNDER THE UNION AND THE STATES [post_name] => services-under-the-union-and-the-states [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1474 [term_id] => 242 ) [536] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10317 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-06-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-28 21:32:59 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SESH NATH SINGH VS BAIDYABATI SHEORAPHULI CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => sesh-nath-singh-vs-baidyabati-sheoraphuli-co-operative-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10317 [term_id] => 35 ) [537] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10317 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-06-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-28 21:32:59 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SESH NATH SINGH VS BAIDYABATI SHEORAPHULI CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => sesh-nath-singh-vs-baidyabati-sheoraphuli-co-operative-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10317 [term_id] => 244 ) [538] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9960 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-05-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-06 21:04:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SEVEN LAMPS OF ADVOCACY [post_name] => seven-lamps-of-advocacy [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9960 [term_id] => 162 ) [539] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9960 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-05-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-06 21:04:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SEVEN LAMPS OF ADVOCACY [post_name] => seven-lamps-of-advocacy [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 9960 [term_id] => 246 ) [540] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10728 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 19:11:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHANTISTAR BUILDERS VS NARAYAN KHIMALAL TOTAME : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => shantistar-builders-vs-narayan-khimalal-totame-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10728 [term_id] => 35 ) [541] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10728 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 19:11:29 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHANTISTAR BUILDERS VS NARAYAN KHIMALAL TOTAME : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => shantistar-builders-vs-narayan-khimalal-totame-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10728 [term_id] => 245 ) [542] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10793 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-26 22:56:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHATRUGHAN CHAUHAN VS STATE OF UP : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => shatrughan-chauhan-vs-state-of-up-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10793 [term_id] => 35 ) [543] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10793 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-26 22:56:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHATRUGHAN CHAUHAN VS STATE OF UP : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => shatrughan-chauhan-vs-state-of-up-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10793 [term_id] => 245 ) [544] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10778 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-23 20:36:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHAYARA BANO VS UNION OF INDIA (TRIPLE TALAQ JUDGMENT) [post_name] => shayara-bano-vs-union-of-india-triple-talaq-judgment [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10778 [term_id] => 35 ) [545] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10778 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-23 20:36:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHAYARA BANO VS UNION OF INDIA (TRIPLE TALAQ JUDGMENT) [post_name] => shayara-bano-vs-union-of-india-triple-talaq-judgment [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10778 [term_id] => 245 ) [546] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10649 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-10 13:58:26 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHEELA BARSE VS STATE OF MAHARASTRA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => sheela-barse-vs-state-of-maharastra-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10649 [term_id] => 245 ) [547] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10897 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-12-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-30 20:40:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHIKSHAK SAHAKARI BANK LTD VS MR. JAGDISH KUMAR PARULKAR, LIQUIDATOR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => shikshak-sahakari-bank-ltd-vs-mr-jagdish-kumar-parulkar-liquidator-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10897 [term_id] => 244 ) [548] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11526 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-04-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-04-29 17:45:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHILPA SAILESH VS VARUN SREENIVASAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => shilpa-sailesh-vs-varun-sreenivasan-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11526 [term_id] => 35 ) [549] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10018 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-18 14:41:22 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHREYA SINGHAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => shreya-singhal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10018 [term_id] => 35 ) [550] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10018 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-05-18 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-18 14:41:22 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SHREYA SINGHAL VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => shreya-singhal-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10018 [term_id] => 245 ) [551] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9747 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-04 18:36:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Sita Soren Vs. Union of India : The Supreme Court holds that bribery is not protected by Parliamentary privileges [post_name] => sita-soren-vs-union-of-india [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9747 [term_id] => 35 ) [552] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9747 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-03-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-04 18:36:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Sita Soren Vs. Union of India : The Supreme Court holds that bribery is not protected by Parliamentary privileges [post_name] => sita-soren-vs-union-of-india [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9747 [term_id] => 245 ) [553] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9937 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-03 22:16:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION FORMAT [post_name] => special-leave-petition-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9937 [term_id] => 1 ) [554] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 528 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-03-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-03-29 07:39:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SREI MULTIPLE ASSET INVESTMENT TRUST VISION INDIA FUND VS DECCAN MARKETEERS ( CASE ANALYSIS ) [post_name] => srei-multiple-asset-investment-trust-judgment [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 528 [term_id] => 35 ) [555] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 528 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-03-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-03-29 07:39:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SREI MULTIPLE ASSET INVESTMENT TRUST VISION INDIA FUND VS DECCAN MARKETEERS ( CASE ANALYSIS ) [post_name] => srei-multiple-asset-investment-trust-judgment [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 528 [term_id] => 244 ) [556] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9815 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-28 21:29:50 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SSANGYONG ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CO LTD VS NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => ssangyong-engineering-and-construction-co-ltd-vs-national-highway-authority-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9815 [term_id] => 35 ) [557] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10642 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-09 12:33:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE BANK OF INDIA VS CONSORTIUM OF MURARI LAL JALAN AND MR. FLORIAN FRITSCH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-bank-of-india-vs-consortium-of-murari-lal-jalan-and-mr-florian-fritsch-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10642 [term_id] => 35 ) [558] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10642 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-11-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-09 12:33:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE BANK OF INDIA VS CONSORTIUM OF MURARI LAL JALAN AND MR. FLORIAN FRITSCH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-bank-of-india-vs-consortium-of-murari-lal-jalan-and-mr-florian-fritsch-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10642 [term_id] => 244 ) [559] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10439 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-08-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-12 23:27:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF MADRAS VS SRIMATHI CHAMPAKAM DORAIRAJAN [post_name] => state-of-madras-vs-srimathi-champakam-dorairajan [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10439 [term_id] => 35 ) [560] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10439 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-08-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-12 23:27:01 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF MADRAS VS SRIMATHI CHAMPAKAM DORAIRAJAN [post_name] => state-of-madras-vs-srimathi-champakam-dorairajan [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10439 [term_id] => 245 ) [561] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10765 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-20 13:54:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF PUNJAB VS DAVINDER SINGH : SUB-CLASSIFICATION WITHIN SCHEDULED CASTES PERMISSIBLE [post_name] => state-of-punjab-vs-davinder-singh-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10765 [term_id] => 35 ) [562] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10765 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-20 13:54:32 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF PUNJAB VS DAVINDER SINGH : SUB-CLASSIFICATION WITHIN SCHEDULED CASTES PERMISSIBLE [post_name] => state-of-punjab-vs-davinder-singh-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10765 [term_id] => 245 ) [563] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10614 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-28 21:16:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF PUNJAB VS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNOR OF PUNJAB : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-of-punjab-vs-principal-secretary-to-governor-of-punjab-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10614 [term_id] => 35 ) [564] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10614 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-28 21:16:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF PUNJAB VS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNOR OF PUNJAB : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-of-punjab-vs-principal-secretary-to-governor-of-punjab-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10614 [term_id] => 245 ) [565] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11535 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2025-05-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-04 15:28:10 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF TAMIL NADU VS GOVERNOR OF TAMIL NADU : A CRITICAL REFLECTION [post_name] => state-of-tamil-nadu-vs-governor-of-tamil-nadu-a-critical-reflection [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 11535 [term_id] => 234 ) [566] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10772 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-22 11:05:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF UTTARANCHAL VS BALWANT SINGH CHAUFAL : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-of-uttaranchal-vs-balwant-singh-chaufal-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10772 [term_id] => 35 ) [567] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10772 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-22 11:05:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF UTTARANCHAL VS BALWANT SINGH CHAUFAL : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-of-uttaranchal-vs-balwant-singh-chaufal-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10772 [term_id] => 245 ) [568] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9783 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-15 22:38:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS THE COMMITTEE FOR PROTECTION OF DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-of-west-bengal-vs-the-committee-for-protection-of-democratic-rights-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9783 [term_id] => 35 ) [569] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9783 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-03-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-15 22:38:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS THE COMMITTEE FOR PROTECTION OF DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-of-west-bengal-vs-the-committee-for-protection-of-democratic-rights-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9783 [term_id] => 245 ) [570] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10348 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-10 10:20:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE TAX OFFICER VS RAINBOW PAPERS LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-tax-officer-vs-rainbow-papers-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10348 [term_id] => 35 ) [571] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10348 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-10 10:20:38 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE TAX OFFICER VS RAINBOW PAPERS LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-tax-officer-vs-rainbow-papers-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10348 [term_id] => 244 ) [572] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10908 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-12-31 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-31 18:58:41 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => STATE TAX OFFICER VS RICOH INDIA LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => state-tax-officer-vs-ricoh-india-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10908 [term_id] => 244 ) [573] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1266 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-07-01 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-07-01 08:34:13 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Student Of Fair Admission Vs. Harvard : Consideration Of Race In Admission To Colleges Are Unconstitutional [post_name] => student-of-fair-admission-vs-harvard-case-analysis [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 1266 [term_id] => 243 ) [574] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10768 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-20 23:27:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUBHASH DESAI VS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNOR OF MAHARASTRA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => subhash-desai-vs-principal-secretary-governor-of-maharastra-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10768 [term_id] => 35 ) [575] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10768 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-20 23:27:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUBHASH DESAI VS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNOR OF MAHARASTRA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => subhash-desai-vs-principal-secretary-governor-of-maharastra-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10768 [term_id] => 245 ) [576] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10651 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-10 18:58:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUBHASH KUMAR VS STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => subhash-kumar-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10651 [term_id] => 35 ) [577] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10651 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-10 18:58:44 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUBHASH KUMAR VS STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => subhash-kumar-vs-state-of-bihar-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10651 [term_id] => 245 ) [578] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9965 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-08 11:25:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUBSTITUTED SERVICE APPLICATION FORMAT UNDER ORDER 5 RULE 20 CPC [post_name] => substituted-service-application-format-under-order-5-rule-20-cpc [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9965 [term_id] => 1 ) [579] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10705 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-13 22:56:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUCHITA SRIVASTAVA VS CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => suchita-srivastava-vs-chandigarh-administration-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10705 [term_id] => 35 ) [580] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10705 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-13 22:56:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUCHITA SRIVASTAVA VS CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION: CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => suchita-srivastava-vs-chandigarh-administration-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10705 [term_id] => 245 ) [581] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 740 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-05-21 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-05-21 17:59:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Suit For Recovery Format [post_name] => suit-for-recovery-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 740 [term_id] => 1 ) [582] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11531 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2025-05-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-04 12:47:52 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE FORMAT [post_name] => suit-for-specific-performance-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 11531 [term_id] => 1 ) [583] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11542 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-05-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-10 18:16:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUKHPAL SINGH KHAIRA VS THE STATE OF PUNJAB : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => sukhpal-singh-khaira-vs-the-state-of-punjab-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11542 [term_id] => 35 ) [584] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11073 [slug] => articles [date] => 2025-02-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-06 21:16:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => summary-of-amendments-of-indian-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 11073 [term_id] => 162 ) [585] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11073 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2025-02-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-02-06 21:16:18 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS OF INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => summary-of-amendments-of-indian-constitution [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 11073 [term_id] => 242 ) [586] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 304 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-02-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-02-11 21:02:24 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUNDARESH BHATT, LIQUIDTOR OF ABG SHIPYARD VS. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => sundaresh-bhatt-liquidator-of-abg-shipyard-vs-central-board-of-indirect-taxes-and-customs [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 304 [term_id] => 35 ) [587] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 304 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-02-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-02-11 21:02:24 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUNDARESH BHATT, LIQUIDTOR OF ABG SHIPYARD VS. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => sundaresh-bhatt-liquidator-of-abg-shipyard-vs-central-board-of-indirect-taxes-and-customs [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 304 [term_id] => 244 ) [588] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10346 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-09 20:27:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUNIL KUMAR JAIN VS. SUNDARESH BHATT : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => sunil-kumar-jain-vs-sundaresh-bhatt-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10346 [term_id] => 35 ) [589] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10346 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-09 20:27:54 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUNIL KUMAR JAIN VS. SUNDARESH BHATT : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => sunil-kumar-jain-vs-sundaresh-bhatt-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10346 [term_id] => 244 ) [590] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10791 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-26 20:37:50 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUPREME COURT ADVOCATE-ON-RECORED ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA (FOURTH JUDGES CASE) [post_name] => supreme-court-advocate-on-recored-association-vs-union-of-india-fourth-judges-case [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10791 [term_id] => 35 ) [591] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10791 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-26 20:37:50 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUPREME COURT ADVOCATE-ON-RECORED ASSOCIATION VS UNION OF INDIA (FOURTH JUDGES CASE) [post_name] => supreme-court-advocate-on-recored-association-vs-union-of-india-fourth-judges-case [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10791 [term_id] => 245 ) [592] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10470 [slug] => book-review [date] => 2024-09-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-04 14:34:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS ON IBC : BOOK REVIEW [post_name] => supreme-court-judgments-on-ibc-book-review [name] => Book Review [object_id] => 10470 [term_id] => 232 ) [593] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10774 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-22 23:00:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUPRIYO @ SUPRIYA CHAKRABORTY VS UNION OF INDIA : RIGHT TO MARRY NOT A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT [post_name] => supriyo-supriya-chakraborty-vs-union-of-india-right-to-marry-not-a-fundamental-right [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10774 [term_id] => 35 ) [594] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10774 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-22 23:00:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUPRIYO @ SUPRIYA CHAKRABORTY VS UNION OF INDIA : RIGHT TO MARRY NOT A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT [post_name] => supriyo-supriya-chakraborty-vs-union-of-india-right-to-marry-not-a-fundamental-right [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10774 [term_id] => 245 ) [595] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10901 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-12-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-30 23:27:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SURAKSHA ASSET RECONSTRUCTION LTD VS VARSHA BAGRI, LIQUIDATOR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => suraksha-asset-reconstruction-ltd-vs-varsha-bagri-liquidator [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10901 [term_id] => 244 ) [596] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9553 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-01-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-27 18:07:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => SUSHILA AGGRAWAL VS STATE ( NCT OF DELHI ) : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => sushila-aggrawal-vs-state-nct-of-delhi-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9553 [term_id] => 35 ) [597] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1181 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-05 07:33:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Swiss Ribbons Pvt Ltd VS Union Of India (Case Summary) [post_name] => swiss-ribbons-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1181 [term_id] => 162 ) [598] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1181 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-05 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-05 07:33:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Swiss Ribbons Pvt Ltd VS Union Of India (Case Summary) [post_name] => swiss-ribbons-pvt-ltd-vs-union-of-india [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1181 [term_id] => 170 ) [599] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10350 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-10 23:25:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. VS VISHAL GHISULAL JAIN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => tata-consultancy-services-ltd-vs-vishal-ghisulal-jain-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10350 [term_id] => 35 ) [600] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10350 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-10 23:25:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD. VS VISHAL GHISULAL JAIN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => tata-consultancy-services-ltd-vs-vishal-ghisulal-jain-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10350 [term_id] => 244 ) [601] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11560 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2025-07-28 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-07-28 23:11:22 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TATA STEEL LTD VS RAJ KUMAR BANNERJEE:CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => tata-steel-ltd-vs-raj-kumar-bannerjeecase-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 11560 [term_id] => 244 ) [602] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9702 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-13 09:00:07 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TECHNIP SA VS SMS HOLDING (PVT.) LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => technip-sa-vs-sms-holding-pvt-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9702 [term_id] => 35 ) [603] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 11549 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2025-05-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2025-05-23 20:07:24 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TEJ PRAKASH PATHAK VS RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => tej-prakash-pathak-vs-rajasthan-high-court-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 11549 [term_id] => 35 ) [604] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10558 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-10 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-10 11:34:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TERRY VS OHIO : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => terry-vs-ohio-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10558 [term_id] => 243 ) [605] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2418 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-20 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-20 16:56:39 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Texas Vs Johnson : Burning Of Flag Protected Under First Amendment [post_name] => texas-vs-johnson-burning-of-flag-protected-under-first-amendment [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2418 [term_id] => 243 ) [606] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1257 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-26 10:14:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE COMPOSITION OF PARLIAMENT [post_name] => the-composition-of-indian-parliament [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1257 [term_id] => 162 ) [607] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1257 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-06-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-26 10:14:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE COMPOSITION OF PARLIAMENT [post_name] => the-composition-of-indian-parliament [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1257 [term_id] => 242 ) [608] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10443 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-08-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-13 20:27:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY VS RANGACHARI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => the-general-manager-southern-railway-vs-rangachari-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10443 [term_id] => 35 ) [609] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10443 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-08-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-08-13 20:27:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY VS RANGACHARI : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => the-general-manager-southern-railway-vs-rangachari-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10443 [term_id] => 245 ) [610] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 541 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-04-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-15 16:46:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE JOURNEY OF THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY [post_name] => the-journey-of-constituent-assembly [name] => Articles [object_id] => 541 [term_id] => 162 ) [611] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 541 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-04-15 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-15 16:46:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE JOURNEY OF THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY [post_name] => the-journey-of-constituent-assembly [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 541 [term_id] => 242 ) [612] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10333 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-07 22:58:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE KARAD URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD VS SWWAPNIL BHINGARDEVAY : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => the-karad-urban-cooperative-bank-ltd-vs-swwapnil-bhingardevay-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10333 [term_id] => 35 ) [613] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10333 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-07 22:58:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE KARAD URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD VS SWWAPNIL BHINGARDEVAY : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => the-karad-urban-cooperative-bank-ltd-vs-swwapnil-bhingardevay-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10333 [term_id] => 244 ) [614] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9641 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-02-06 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-06 15:00:07 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE NEED FOR CLARITY ON JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION [post_name] => the-need-for-clarity-on-jurisdiction-of-the-supreme-court-under-article-32-of-the-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9641 [term_id] => 162 ) [615] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 531 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-04-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-07 06:59:07 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE ROAD TO THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => the-road-to-the-indian-constitution [name] => Articles [object_id] => 531 [term_id] => 162 ) [616] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 531 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-04-07 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-07 06:59:07 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE ROAD TO THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION [post_name] => the-road-to-the-indian-constitution [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 531 [term_id] => 242 ) [617] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10602 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-24 23:20:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE STATE OF KERALA VS. K. AJITH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => the-state-of-kerala-vs-k-ajith-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10602 [term_id] => 35 ) [618] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10602 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-09-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-24 23:20:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE STATE OF KERALA VS. K. AJITH : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => the-state-of-kerala-vs-k-ajith-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10602 [term_id] => 245 ) [619] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10763 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-19 23:30:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS ANWAR ALI SARKAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => the-state-of-west-bengal-vs-anwar-ali-sarkar-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10763 [term_id] => 35 ) [620] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10763 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-19 23:30:19 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS ANWAR ALI SARKAR : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => the-state-of-west-bengal-vs-anwar-ali-sarkar-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10763 [term_id] => 245 ) [621] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9719 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-02-16 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-16 05:03:20 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => THE SUPREME COURT JUNKS ELECTORAL BONDS [post_name] => the-supreme-court-junks-electoral-bonds [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9719 [term_id] => 35 ) [622] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2403 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 16:50:34 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Tinker Vs Des Moines : Rights Of Students Are Also Protected Under First Amendment [post_name] => tinker-vs-des-moines-rights-of-students-are-also-protected-under-first-amendment [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2403 [term_id] => 243 ) [623] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9831 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-04-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-02 23:32:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TMA PAI FOUNDATION VS STATE OF KARNATKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => tma-pai-foundation-vs-state-of-karnatka-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9831 [term_id] => 35 ) [624] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9831 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-04-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-02 23:32:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TMA PAI FOUNDATION VS STATE OF KARNATKA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => tma-pai-foundation-vs-state-of-karnatka-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9831 [term_id] => 245 ) [625] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2222 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-10-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-24 08:27:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Tottempudi Salalith Vs State Bank Of India : Doctrine Of Election Will Not Apply In Case Of Insolvency Proceedings Initiated On The Basis Of Recovery Certificate [post_name] => tottempudi-salalith-vs-state-bank-of-india-supreme-court [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 2222 [term_id] => 35 ) [626] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2222 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-10-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-10-24 08:27:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Tottempudi Salalith Vs State Bank Of India : Doctrine Of Election Will Not Apply In Case Of Insolvency Proceedings Initiated On The Basis Of Recovery Certificate [post_name] => tottempudi-salalith-vs-state-bank-of-india-supreme-court [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2222 [term_id] => 162 ) [627] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1446 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-08-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-26 12:45:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TRADE , COMMERCE AND INTERCOURSE WITHIN TERRITORY OF INDIA [post_name] => trade-commerce-and-intercourse-within-the-territory-of-india [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1446 [term_id] => 162 ) [628] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1446 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-08-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-26 12:45:51 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TRADE , COMMERCE AND INTERCOURSE WITHIN TERRITORY OF INDIA [post_name] => trade-commerce-and-intercourse-within-the-territory-of-india [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1446 [term_id] => 242 ) [629] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9942 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-04 20:18:55 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TRANSFER PETITION FORMAT IN MATRIMONIAL MATTERS _SUPREME COURT [post_name] => transfer-petition-format-in-matrimonial-matters-_supreme-court [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9942 [term_id] => 1 ) [630] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9947 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2024-05-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-04 22:22:00 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TRANSFER PETITION FORMAT UNDER SECTION 406 Cr.PC _SUPREME COURT [post_name] => transfer-petition-format-under-section-406-cr-pc-_supreme-court [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 9947 [term_id] => 1 ) [631] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2330 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-11-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-24 15:29:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TREATMENT OF PF, GRATUITY AND PENSION DUES UNDER IBC – A GREY AREA REQUIRING CLARITY [post_name] => treatment-of-pf-gratuity-and-pension-dues-under-ibc-a-grey-area-requiring-clarity [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2330 [term_id] => 162 ) [632] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2330 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-11-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-24 15:29:30 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TREATMENT OF PF, GRATUITY AND PENSION DUES UNDER IBC – A GREY AREA REQUIRING CLARITY [post_name] => treatment-of-pf-gratuity-and-pension-dues-under-ibc-a-grey-area-requiring-clarity [name] => IBC [object_id] => 2330 [term_id] => 170 ) [633] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9710 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-13 18:10:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TREATMENT OF SECURED CREDITORS UNDER IBC [post_name] => treatment-of-secured-creditor-under-ibc [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9710 [term_id] => 162 ) [634] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9710 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-02-13 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-02-13 18:10:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TREATMENT OF SECURED CREDITORS UNDER IBC [post_name] => treatment-of-secured-creditor-under-ibc [name] => IBC [object_id] => 9710 [term_id] => 170 ) [635] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10858 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 18:25:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TREATMENT OF THE SECURED CREDITOR UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => treatment-of-the-secured-creditor-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10858 [term_id] => 170 ) [636] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1479 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-09-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-12 14:20:35 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TRIBUNALS AND THEIR INCREASING ROLE IN ADJUDICATION [post_name] => tribunals-and-their-increasing-role-in-adjudication [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1479 [term_id] => 162 ) [637] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1479 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-09-12 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-12 14:20:35 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => TRIBUNALS AND THEIR INCREASING ROLE IN ADJUDICATION [post_name] => tribunals-and-their-increasing-role-in-adjudication [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1479 [term_id] => 242 ) [638] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1426 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-08-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-09 15:56:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNENDING BATTLE FOR CONTROL OF SERVICES BETWEEN DELHI GOVT AND CENTRE [post_name] => unending-battle-for-control-of-services-between-delhi-and-centre [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1426 [term_id] => 162 ) [639] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1426 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-08-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-09 15:56:14 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNENDING BATTLE FOR CONTROL OF SERVICES BETWEEN DELHI GOVT AND CENTRE [post_name] => unending-battle-for-control-of-services-between-delhi-and-centre [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1426 [term_id] => 242 ) [640] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2239 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-11-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-02 09:03:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNIFORM CIVIL CODE : WILL IT EVER SEE LIGHT OF THE DAY ? [post_name] => uniform-civil-code-will-it-ever-see-light-of-the-day [name] => Articles [object_id] => 2239 [term_id] => 162 ) [641] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2239 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-11-02 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-11-02 09:03:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNIFORM CIVIL CODE : WILL IT EVER SEE LIGHT OF THE DAY ? [post_name] => uniform-civil-code-will-it-ever-see-light-of-the-day [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 2239 [term_id] => 242 ) [642] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 549 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-04-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-22 12:36:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNION AND ITS TERRITORY [post_name] => union-and-its-territory [name] => Articles [object_id] => 549 [term_id] => 162 ) [643] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 549 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-04-22 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-04-22 12:36:40 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNION AND ITS TERRITORY [post_name] => union-and-its-territory [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 549 [term_id] => 242 ) [644] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10797 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-29 11:42:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNION OF INDIA VS ASSOCIATION OF DEMOCRATIC REFORMS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => union-of-india-vs-association-of-democratic-reforms-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10797 [term_id] => 35 ) [645] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10797 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-29 11:42:53 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNION OF INDIA VS ASSOCIATION OF DEMOCRATIC REFORMS : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => union-of-india-vs-association-of-democratic-reforms-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10797 [term_id] => 245 ) [646] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9977 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-05-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-05-11 21:48:12 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNION OF INDIA VS SRI HARAN @ MURUGAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => union-of-india-vs-sri-haran-murugan-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9977 [term_id] => 35 ) [647] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1424 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-08-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-08 14:55:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNION TERRITORIES AND THEIR ADMINISTRATION [post_name] => union-territories-and-thier-administration [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1424 [term_id] => 162 ) [648] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1424 [slug] => indian-constitution [date] => 2023-08-08 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-08 14:55:23 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNION TERRITORIES AND THEIR ADMINISTRATION [post_name] => union-territories-and-thier-administration [name] => Indian Constitution [object_id] => 1424 [term_id] => 242 ) [649] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10578 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-14 23:31:08 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => UNITED STATES VS NIXON : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => united-states-vs-nixon-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10578 [term_id] => 243 ) [650] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10319 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-06-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-30 11:22:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => V NAGARAJAN VS SKS ISPAT AND POWER LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => v-nagarajan-vs-sks-ispat-and-power-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10319 [term_id] => 35 ) [651] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10319 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-06-30 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-06-30 11:22:31 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => V NAGARAJAN VS SKS ISPAT AND POWER LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => v-nagarajan-vs-sks-ispat-and-power-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10319 [term_id] => 244 ) [652] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10595 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-09-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-23 00:27:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => V. S. PALANIVEL VS. P. SRIRAM,CS, LIQUIDATOR : TIME LINE PRESCRIBED UNDER RULE 12 OF SCHEDULE I OF LIIQUIDATION PROCESS REGULATION IS MANDATORY [post_name] => v-s-palanivel-vs-p-sriramcs-liquidator [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10595 [term_id] => 35 ) [653] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10595 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-09-23 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-23 00:27:06 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => V. S. PALANIVEL VS. P. SRIRAM,CS, LIQUIDATOR : TIME LINE PRESCRIBED UNDER RULE 12 OF SCHEDULE I OF LIIQUIDATION PROCESS REGULATION IS MANDATORY [post_name] => v-s-palanivel-vs-p-sriramcs-liquidator [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10595 [term_id] => 244 ) [654] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10342 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-09 11:54:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VALLAL RCK VS M/S SIVA INDUSTRIES AND HOLDING LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => vallal-rck-vs-m-s-siva-industries-and-holding-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10342 [term_id] => 35 ) [655] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10342 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-09 11:54:43 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VALLAL RCK VS M/S SIVA INDUSTRIES AND HOLDING LTD : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => vallal-rck-vs-m-s-siva-industries-and-holding-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10342 [term_id] => 244 ) [656] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9744 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-03-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-03 06:13:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VELLORE CITIZENS WELFARE FORUM VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => vellore-citizens-welfare-forum-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 9744 [term_id] => 35 ) [657] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9744 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-03-03 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-03 06:13:56 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VELLORE CITIZENS WELFARE FORUM VS UNION OF INDIA : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => vellore-citizens-welfare-forum-vs-union-of-india-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 9744 [term_id] => 245 ) [658] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 525 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2023-03-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-03-19 03:08:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VICTORY IRON WORKS LTD. VS JITENDRA LOHIA (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => victory-iron-works [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 525 [term_id] => 35 ) [659] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 525 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2023-03-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-03-19 03:08:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VICTORY IRON WORKS LTD. VS JITENDRA LOHIA (CASE SUMMARY) [post_name] => victory-iron-works [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 525 [term_id] => 244 ) [660] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10344 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-07-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-09 14:30:16 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VIDARBHA INDUSTRIES POWER LTD. VS. AXIS BANK LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => vidarbha-industries-power-ltd-vs-axis-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10344 [term_id] => 35 ) [661] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10344 [slug] => supreme-court-on-ibc [date] => 2024-07-09 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-07-09 14:30:16 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VIDARBHA INDUSTRIES POWER LTD. VS. AXIS BANK LTD. : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => vidarbha-industries-power-ltd-vs-axis-bank-ltd-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on IBC [object_id] => 10344 [term_id] => 244 ) [662] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10730 [slug] => judgments [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 21:55:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VISHAKA VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => vishaka-vs-state-of-rajasthan-case-summary [name] => Judgments [object_id] => 10730 [term_id] => 35 ) [663] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10730 [slug] => supreme-court-on-constitution [date] => 2024-11-17 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-11-17 21:55:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VISHAKA VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => vishaka-vs-state-of-rajasthan-case-summary [name] => Supreme Court on Constitution [object_id] => 10730 [term_id] => 245 ) [664] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1159 [slug] => articles [date] => 2023-06-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-04 14:24:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd. & Ors VS. Mr. Dinkar Venkatasubramanian & Anr (Case Summary ) [post_name] => vistra-itcl-india-ltd-vs-mr-dinkar-venkatasubramanian [name] => Articles [object_id] => 1159 [term_id] => 162 ) [665] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1159 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2023-06-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-06-04 14:24:02 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Vistra ITCL (India) Ltd. & Ors VS. Mr. Dinkar Venkatasubramanian & Anr (Case Summary ) [post_name] => vistra-itcl-india-ltd-vs-mr-dinkar-venkatasubramanian [name] => IBC [object_id] => 1159 [term_id] => 170 ) [666] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10874 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 19:32:05 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => voluntary-liquidation-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10874 [term_id] => 170 ) [667] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10860 [slug] => ibc [date] => 2024-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-12-19 18:30:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WATERFALL DISTRIBUTION UNDER INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 [post_name] => waterfall-distribution-under-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-2016 [name] => IBC [object_id] => 10860 [term_id] => 170 ) [668] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2387 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2023-12-19 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-12-19 16:05:33 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => West Coast Hotel Vs Parris: State Can Fix Minimum Wage [post_name] => west-coast-hotel-vs-parris-state-can-fix-minimum-wage [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 2387 [term_id] => 243 ) [669] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9811 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-03-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-27 14:01:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WHAT ARE CONTEMPT POWERS OF THE SUPREME COURT ? [post_name] => what-are-contempt-powers-of-the-supreme-court [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9811 [term_id] => 162 ) [670] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9811 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-03-27 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-27 14:01:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WHAT ARE CONTEMPT POWERS OF THE SUPREME COURT ? [post_name] => what-are-contempt-powers-of-the-supreme-court [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 9811 [term_id] => 246 ) [671] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9808 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-03-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-26 20:18:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WHAT ARE DUTIES OF AN ADVOCATE TOWARDS CLIENTS ? [post_name] => what-are-duties-of-an-advocate-towards-clients [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9808 [term_id] => 162 ) [672] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9808 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-03-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-26 20:18:47 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WHAT ARE DUTIES OF AN ADVOCATE TOWARDS CLIENTS ? [post_name] => what-are-duties-of-an-advocate-towards-clients [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 9808 [term_id] => 246 ) [673] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9501 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-01-26 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-01-26 16:06:49 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WHAT ARE TYPES OF CREDIT FACILITIES ? [post_name] => what-are-types-of-credit-facilities [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9501 [term_id] => 162 ) [674] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9835 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-04-04 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-04-04 11:47:09 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WHAT IS SCOPE OF JURISDICTION OF SUPREME COURT UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ? [post_name] => scope-of-jurisdiction-of-supreme-court-under-article-32 [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9835 [term_id] => 162 ) [675] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9797 [slug] => articles [date] => 2024-03-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-25 10:39:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WHEN AMICUS CURIAE IS APPOINTED BY COURT ? [post_name] => when-amicus-curiae-is-appointed-by-court [name] => Articles [object_id] => 9797 [term_id] => 162 ) [676] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 9797 [slug] => professional-ethics [date] => 2024-03-25 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-03-25 10:39:57 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WHEN AMICUS CURIAE IS APPOINTED BY COURT ? [post_name] => when-amicus-curiae-is-appointed-by-court [name] => Professional Ethics [object_id] => 9797 [term_id] => 246 ) [677] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10564 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-11 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-11 20:01:16 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => WISCONSIN VS YODER : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => wisconsin-vs-yoder-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10564 [term_id] => 243 ) [678] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 2044 [slug] => featured-post [date] => 2023-09-29 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-09-29 19:02:11 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Women's Reservation Bill, 2023 : Is It The End Of An Unending Story ? [post_name] => all-about-womens-reservation-bill-2023 [name] => Featured Post [object_id] => 2044 [term_id] => 234 ) [679] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 1444 [slug] => legal-formats [date] => 2023-08-24 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2023-08-24 07:02:28 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => Written Statement Format [post_name] => written-statement-format [name] => Legal Formats [object_id] => 1444 [term_id] => 1 ) [680] => stdClass Object ( [ID] => 10576 [slug] => usa-supreme-court-judgments [date] => 2024-09-14 [post_status] => publish [post_type] => post [post_date] => 2024-09-14 22:31:48 [post_author] => 1 [post_title] => YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE CO. VS SAWYER : CASE SUMMARY [post_name] => youngstown-sheet-tube-co-vs-sawyer-case-summary [name] => USA Supreme Court [object_id] => 10576 [term_id] => 243 ) )
►
Articles
►
Book Review
►
Everyday Law
►
Featured Post
►
IBC
►
Indian Constitution
►
Judgments
▼
Legal Formats
►
Professional Ethics
►
PWDVA
►
Supreme Court on Constitution
►
Supreme Court on IBC
►
USA Supreme Court