RUDUL SAH VS STATE OF BIHAR : CASE SUMMARY
The Supreme Court held in Rudul Sah Vs State of Bihar 1983 AIR 1086 that compensation can be granted to aggrieved persons under Article 32 against violation of Fundamental Rights.
Read MoreAdvocate | Educator | Author
The Supreme Court held in Rudul Sah Vs State of Bihar 1983 AIR 1086 that compensation can be granted to aggrieved persons under Article 32 against violation of Fundamental Rights.
Read MoreThe Supreme Court in M. H. Hoskot Vs. State of Maharastra (1878)AIR 1548 held that indigent prisoners have to be provided free services of lawyers for filing appeal.
Read MoreThe Supreme Court in Prem Shankar Shukla Vs Delhi Administration (1980) AIR 1535 held that freedom from handcuff during transit between the prison house and court house will be the rule except the exceptional circumstances.
Read MoreThe Supreme Court in Husaainara Khatoon Vs State of Bihar (1979) SCR 169 held that right to speedy trial is implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Read MoreThe Supreme Court in Rustom Cavasjee Cooper Vs Union of India (1970) SCR 3 530 rejected the view taken in A. K. Gopalan VS. State of Madras 1950 AIR 27 that certain articles of the Constitution exclusively deal with specific matters and effect of the laws on other Fundamental Rights of the individuals will be ignored.
Read More