Constitution

The Supreme Court in Maru Ram Vs Union of India (1981) 1 SCR 1196  held  that pardoning powers under Article 72 or Article 161 by the President or the Governor , as the case may be, have to be exercised on the aid and advice of Council of Ministers.

The Supreme Court in Excel Wear Etc Vs Union of India (1979) 1 SCR 1009  held that the right to close business is an integral part of  Fundamental Right to carry on a business.

The Supreme Court in Suchita Srivastava Vs. Chandigarh Administration (2009) 13 SCR 989   held that a woman’s right to make reproductive choices is also a dimension of “personal liberty”  as understood under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court held in Kharak Singh Vs State of U.P. (1964) 1 SCR 332 that right to “move” denotes nothing more than a right of locomotion and that in the context the adverb “freely” would only connote that the freedom to move is without restriction and is absolute.

The Supreme Court in S. P. Mittal Vs. Union of India (1983)1SCR 729 held that Sri Aurobindo Society was not a religious denomination.